IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/streco/v59y2021icp470-481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pasinetti's theorem: A narrow escape, for what was to become an inexhaustible research programme

Author

Listed:
  • Baranzini, Mauro L.
  • Mirante, Amalia

Abstract

Pasinetti's theorem, first published in The Review of Economic Studies in 1962 ‘rather against the opposition of the then editors of the Review’ has led to the development of nine main research lines branching out into numerous fields of economic analysis. Against this background, the historical, demographic, institutional, financial, micro-economic and even religious perspectives have come under close scrutiny by more than 300 scholars; and it is still very much ‘work in progress’ (as the re-visitation by Piketty in 2014, and Stiglitz et al. in 2017). We reassess here the fragile beginnings of the theorem, often labelled as the New Cambridge Equation; which saw Pasinetti backed by Kaldor and J. Robinson in the 1966 Review of Economic Studies Symposium, against James Meade, Paul Samuelson and Franco Modigliani who formulated their Anti-Pasinetti or Dual Theorem. We suggest that Frank Hahn played an important part by siding with Meade and the MIT economists.

Suggested Citation

  • Baranzini, Mauro L. & Mirante, Amalia, 2021. "Pasinetti's theorem: A narrow escape, for what was to become an inexhaustible research programme," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 470-481.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:streco:v:59:y:2021:i:c:p:470-481
    DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2021.09.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0954349X21001302
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.strueco.2021.09.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baranzini, Mauro, 1991. "A Theory of Wealth Distribution and Accumulation," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198233138.
    2. Fazi, Elido & Salvadori, Neri, 1985. "The Existence of a Two-Class Economy in a General Cambridge Model of Growth and Distribution," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 9(2), pages 155-164, June.
    3. Robert M. Solow, 2000. "The neoclassical theory of growth and distribution," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 349-381.
    4. G. C. Harcourt, 2008. "The Structure of Post-Keynesian Economics," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Mathew Forstater & L. Randall Wray (ed.), Keynes for the Twenty-First Century, chapter 0, pages 185-197, Palgrave Macmillan.
    5. R. F. Kahn, 1959. "Exercises In The Analysis Of Growth," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 143-156.
    6. Pasinetti,Luigi L., 2007. "Keynes and the Cambridge Keynesians," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521872270.
    7. Nicholas Kaldor, 1960. "A Rejoinder to Mr. Atsumi and Professor Tobin," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 27(2), pages 121-123.
    8. Luigi L. Pasinetti, 2000. "Critique of the neoclassical theory of growth and distribution," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 383-431.
    9. Lall Ramrattan & Michael Szenberg, 2007. "Paul Samuelson and the Dual Pasinetti Theory," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 51(2), pages 40-48, October.
    10. Luigi L. Pasinetti, 1989. "Government Deficit Spending Is Not Incompatible with the Cambridge Theorem of the Rate of Profit: A Reply to Fleck and Domenghino," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 641-647, July.
    11. Thomas Piketty & Emmanuel Saez, 2014. "Inequality in the long run," PSE - Labex "OSE-Ouvrir la Science Economique" halshs-01053609, HAL.
    12. Hiroshi Atsumi, 1960. "Mr. Kaldor's Theory of Income Distribution," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 27(2), pages 109-118.
    13. Mauro Baranzini, 2005. "Modigliani's life-cycle theory of savings fifty years later," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 58(233-234), pages 109-172.
    14. Luigi L. Pasinetti, 1983. "Conditions of Existence of a Two Class Economy in the Kaldor and More General Models of Growth and Income Distribution," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 91-102, August.
    15. Luca Zamparelli, 2017. "Wealth Distribution, Elasticity of Substitution and Piketty: An ‘Anti-Dual’ Pasinetti Economy," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(4), pages 927-946, November.
    16. Paul A. Samuelson, 2005. "Franco: a mind never at rest," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 58(233-234), pages 5-9.
    17. Mauro Baranzini, 2005. "Modigliani's life-cycle theory of savings fifty years later," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 58(233-234), pages 109-172.
    18. Luigi L. Pasinetti, 1966. "New Results in an Old Framework: Comment on Samuelson and Modigliani," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 33(4), pages 303-306.
    19. Joan Robinson, 1966. "Comment on Samuelson and Modigliani," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 33(4), pages 307-308.
    20. Baranzini, Mauro, 1975. "The Pasinetti and the Anti-Pasinetti Theorems: A Reconciliation," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 470-473, November.
    21. Pier Luigi Porta & Roberto Scazzieri, 2008. ""A Revolution to be Accomplished": Keynes and the Cambridge Keynesians," Economia politica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 455-480.
    22. James Tobin, 1960. "Towards a General Kaldorian Theory of Distribution," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 27(2), pages 119-120.
    23. K. Sato, 1966. "The Neoclassical Theorem and Distribution of Income and Wealth," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 33(4), pages 331-335.
    24. Cardinale, Ivano, 2018. "A bridge over troubled water: A Structural Political Economy of vertical integration," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 172-179.
    25. Mattauch, Linus & Klenert, David & Stiglitz, Joseph E. & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2017. "Piketty meets Pasinetti: On public investment and intelligent machinery," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168156, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    26. Lance Taylor, 2014. "The Triumph of the Rentier? Thomas Piketty vs. Luigi Pasinetti & John Maynard Keynes," SCEPA working paper series. 2014-7, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
    27. Samuelson, Paul A, 1991. "Extirpating Error Contamination Concerning the Post-Keynesian Anti-Pasinetti Equilibrium," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 43(2), pages 177-186, April.
    28. Pasinetti, Luigi L, 1989. "Ricardian Debt/Taxation Equivalence in the Kaldor Theory of Profits and Income Distribution," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 13(1), pages 25-36, March.
    29. Cardinale, Ivano & Scazzieri, Roberto, 2019. "Explaining structural change: actions and transformations," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 393-404.
    30. Harcourt,G. C., 1972. "Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521096720.
    31. Luigi L. Pasinetti, 1962. "Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 29(4), pages 267-279.
    32. Lance Taylor, 2014. "The Triumph of the Rentier? Thomas Piketty vs. Luigi Pasinetti and John Maynard Keynes," International Journal of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(3), pages 4-17, July.
    33. Balestra, Pietro & Baranzini, Mauro, 1971. "Some Optimal Aspects in a Two Class Growth Model with a Differentiated Interest Rate," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 240-256.
    34. Goodwin, Richard, 1994. "Kahn and Economic Dynamics," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 18(1), pages 73-76, February.
    35. Roberto Scazzieri, 1990. "Vertical Integration in Economic Theory," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 20-46, September.
    36. Christopher Bliss, 2010. "The Cambridge Post-Keynesians: An Outsider's Insider View," History of Political Economy, Duke University Press, vol. 42(4), pages 631-652, Winter.
    37. F. H. Fleck & C.-M. Domenghino, 1987. "Cambridge (U.K.) versus Cambridge (Mass.): A Keynesian Solution of “Pasinetti’s Paradox”," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 22-36, September.
    38. Perry P. Chang, 1964. "Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth: A Comment," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 31(2), pages 103-105.
    39. Dougherty, C R S, 1972. "On the Rate of Return and the Rate of Profit," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 82(328), pages 1324-1350, December.
    40. Fazi, Elido & Salvadori, Neri, 1981. "The Existence of a Two-Class Economy in the Kaldor Model of Growth and Distribution," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 582-592.
    41. Luigi L. Pasinetti, 2000. "Critique of the neoclassical theory of growth and distribution," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 383-431.
    42. Elido Fazi & Neri Salvadori*, 1981. "The Existence Of A Two‐Class Economy In The Kaldor Model Of Growth And Distribution," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 582-592, November.
    43. Domenico Mario Nuti, 1974. "On The Rates Of Return On Investment," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 345-369, January.
    44. Robin Marris, 1991. "Reconstructing Keynesian Economics With Imperfect Competition," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 300.
    45. G.C. Harcourt, 2011. ""The General Theory is not a book that you should read in bed!" Interview with G.C. Harcourt," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 8(1), pages 7-12.
    46. F. H. Fleck & C.-M. Domenghino, 1990. "Government Activity Invalidate the “Cambridge Theorem of the Rate of Profit”," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 487-497, March.
    47. Paul A. Samuelson & Franco Modigliani, 1966. "The Pasinetti Paradox in Neoclassical and More General Models," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 33(4), pages 269-301.
    48. Pietro Balestra & Mauro Baranzini, 1971. "Some Optimal Aspects In A Two Class Growth Model With A Differentiated Interest Rate," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(2), pages 240-256, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mattauch, Linus & Klenert, David & Stiglitz, Joseph E. & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2022. "Overcoming wealth inequality by capital taxes that finance public investment," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 383-395.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luca Zamparelli, 2017. "Wealth Distribution, Elasticity of Substitution and Piketty: An ‘Anti-Dual’ Pasinetti Economy," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 68(4), pages 927-946, November.
    2. Kazuhiro Kurose, 2022. "A two-class economy from the multi-sectoral perspective: the controversy between Pasinetti and Meade–Hahn–Samuelson–Modigliani revisited," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 239-270, April.
    3. Heinz D. Kurz & Neri Salvadori, 2010. "The Post-Keynesian Theories of Growth and Distribution: A Survey," Chapters, in: Mark Setterfield (ed.), Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Mattauch, Linus & Klenert, David & Stiglitz, Joseph E. & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2017. "Piketty meets Pasinetti: On public investment and intelligent machinery," VfS Annual Conference 2017 (Vienna): Alternative Structures for Money and Banking 168156, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    5. Stefan Ederer & Maximilian Mayerhofer & Miriam Rehm, 2021. "Rich and ever richer? Differential returns across socioeconomic groups," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(2), pages 283-301, April.
    6. Mattauch, Linus & Klenert, David & Stiglitz, Joseph E. & Edenhofer, Ottmar, 2022. "Overcoming wealth inequality by capital taxes that finance public investment," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 383-395.
    7. Linus Mattauch & Ottmar Edenhofer & David Klenert & Sophie Bénard, 2016. "Distributional Effects of Public Investment when Wealth and Classes are Back," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(3), pages 603-629, July.
    8. Stefan Ederer & Miriam Rehm, 2021. "Wealth inequality and aggregate demand," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 405-424, May.
    9. Javier López-Bernardo & Félix López-Martínez & Engelbert Stockhammer, 2016. "A Post-Keynesian Response to Piketty's ‘Fundamental Contradiction of Capitalism’," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 190-204, April.
    10. Geoffrey Harcourt & Peter Kriesler, 2012. "Introduction [to Handbook of Post-Keynesian Economics: Oxford University Press: USA]," Discussion Papers 2012-33, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    11. Arthur Jacobs, 2023. "Capitalist-Worker Wealth Distribution in a Task-Based Model of Automation," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 23/1064, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    12. Hiroaki Sasaki, 2022. "Growth and income distribution in an economy with dynasties and overlapping generations," Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 215-238, April.
    13. Soon Ryoo, 2016. "Inequality of Income and Wealth in the Long Run: A Kaldorian Perspective," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 429-457, May.
    14. Joao Ricardo Faria & Ricardo Azevedo Araujo, 2004. "An Intertemporal Pasinettian Model with Government Sector," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 3(3), pages 257-268, December.
    15. Massimiliano La Marca, 2005. "The Public Sector In A Model Of Growth And Distribution À La Pasinetti: Existence Of One‐ Or Two‐Class Economies," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 157-181, May.
    16. Avi J. Cohen, 2003. "Retrospectives: Whatever Happened to the Cambridge Capital Theory Controversies?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 17(1), pages 199-214, Winter.
    17. Luigi L. Pasinetti, 2000. "Critique of the neoclassical theory of growth and distribution," Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 383-431.
    18. Luigi L. Pasinetti, 2000. "Critique of the neoclassical theory of growth and distribution," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 53(215), pages 383-431.
    19. Fischer, Thomas, 2017. "Thomas Piketty and the rate of time preference," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 111-133.
    20. Usamah Uthman, 2006. "Profit-sharing versus interest-taking in the Kaldor-Pasinetti theory of income and profit distribution," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 209-222.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:streco:v:59:y:2021:i:c:p:470-481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/525148 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.