IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v165y2020ics0167715220301516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A modified version of stochastic dominance involving dependence

Author

Listed:
  • Montes, Ignacio
  • Salamanca, Juan Jesús
  • Montes, Susana

Abstract

Stochastic orders are mathematical methods allowing the comparison of random quantities. Probably the most usual one is stochastic dominance, which is based on the comparison of univariate cumulative distribution functions. Although it has been commonly applied, it does not consider the dependence between the random variables. This paper introduces a new stochastic order that slightly modifies stochastic dominance preserving its philosophy but taking into account the dependence between the random variables. This new stochastic order is based on the comparison of the cumulative distribution functions of the differences of the random variables, and it is closely related to regret theory. Since it uses the joint distribution, the copula gathering the dependence plays a crucial role. We present a theoretical study of this new stochastic order, delving into its connection with regret theory, investigating the role of the copula that links the random variables and establishing some connections with stochastic dominance.

Suggested Citation

  • Montes, Ignacio & Salamanca, Juan Jesús & Montes, Susana, 2020. "A modified version of stochastic dominance involving dependence," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:165:y:2020:i:c:s0167715220301516
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2020.108848
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715220301516
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2020.108848?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gijbels, Irène & Herrmann, Klaus, 2014. "On the distribution of sums of random variables with copula-induced dependence," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 27-44.
    2. Denuit, Michel M. & Mesfioui, Mhamed, 2011. "The dispersive effect of cross-aging with archimedean copulas," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(9), pages 1407-1418, September.
    3. Montes, Ignacio & Miranda, Enrique & Montes, Susana, 2014. "Stochastic dominance with imprecise information," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 868-886.
    4. Loomes, Graham & Sugden, Robert, 1982. "Regret Theory: An Alternative Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 92(368), pages 805-824, December.
    5. Ogryczak, Wlodzimierz & Ruszczynski, Andrzej, 1999. "From stochastic dominance to mean-risk models: Semideviations as risk measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 33-50, July.
    6. P. C. Álvarez-Esteban & E. del Barrio & J. A. Cuesta-Albertos & C. Matrán, 2016. "A contamination model for the stochastic order," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 25(4), pages 751-774, December.
    7. Yuan, Hongmin & Jiang, Long & Tian, Dejian, 2020. "Representation theorems for WVaR with respect to a capacity," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    8. Montes, Ignacio & Montes, Susana, 2016. "Stochastic dominance and statistical preference for random variables coupled by an Archimedean copula or by the Fr e ´ chet–Hoeffding upper bound," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 275-298.
    9. Colangelo, Antonio & Scarsini, Marco & Shaked, Moshe, 2006. "Some positive dependence stochastic orders," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 46-78, January.
    10. De Meyer, H. & De Baets, B. & De Schuymer, B., 2007. "On the transitivity of the comonotonic and countermonotonic comparison of random variables," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 98(1), pages 177-193, January.
    11. Dhaene, J. & Denuit, M. & Goovaerts, M. J. & Kaas, R. & Vyncke, D., 2002. "The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 3-33, August.
    12. Dhaene, J. & Denuit, M. & Goovaerts, M. J. & Kaas, R. & Vyncke, D., 2002. "The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: applications," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 133-161, October.
    13. Marco Scarsini & Alfred Muller, 2001. "Stochastic comparison of random vectors with a common copula," Post-Print hal-00540198, HAL.
    14. Arendarczyk, Marek & Kozubowski, Tomasz. J. & Panorska, Anna K., 2018. "The joint distribution of the sum and the maximum of heterogeneous exponential random variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 10-19.
    15. David E. Bell, 1982. "Regret in Decision Making under Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(5), pages 961-981, October.
    16. Puccetti, Giovanni, 2013. "Sharp bounds on the expected shortfall for a sum of dependent random variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(4), pages 1227-1232.
    17. Alfred Müller & Marco Scarsini, 2001. "Stochastic Comparison of Random Vectors with a Common Copula," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 723-740, November.
    18. Denuit, Michel & Mesfioui, Mhamed, 2011. "Dispersive effect of cross-aging with archimedean copulas," LIDAM Reprints ISBA 2011023, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Belzunce, Félix & Martínez-Riquelme, Carolina, 2023. "A new stochastic dominance criterion for dependent random variables with applications," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 165-176.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sordo, Miguel A. & Suárez-Llorens, Alfonso & Bello, Alfonso J., 2015. "Comparison of conditional distributions in portfolios of dependent risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 62-69.
    2. Hu, Taizhong & Chen, Ouxiang, 2020. "On a family of coherent measures of variability," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 173-182.
    3. Colangelo, Antonio & Scarsini, Marco & Shaked, Moshe, 2005. "Some notions of multivariate positive dependence," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 13-26, August.
    4. Chenguang (Allen) Wu & Achal Bassamboo & Ohad Perry, 2019. "Service System with Dependent Service and Patience Times," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 1151-1172, March.
    5. Hanbali, Hamza & Dhaene, Jan & Linders, Daniël, 2022. "Dependence bounds for the difference of stop-loss payoffs on the difference of two random variables," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 22-37.
    6. Georgia Perakis & Guillaume Roels, 2008. "Regret in the Newsvendor Model with Partial Information," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(1), pages 188-203, February.
    7. Jinyi Hu, 2023. "Linguistic Multiple-Attribute Decision Making Based on Regret Theory and Minimax-DEA," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.
    8. Martín Egozcue & Xu Guo & Wing-Keung Wong, 2015. "Optimal output for the regret-averse competitive firm under price uncertainty," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 5(2), pages 279-295, December.
    9. Dimitrios G. Konstantinides & Georgios C. Zachos, 2019. "Exhibiting Abnormal Returns Under a Risk Averse Strategy," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 551-566, June.
    10. Boonen, Tim J. & Liu, Fangda, 2022. "Insurance with heterogeneous preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    11. Jhunjhunwala, Tanushree, 2021. "Searching to avoid regret: An experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 298-319.
    12. Zheng, Yanting & Yang, Jingping & Huang, Jianhua Z., 2011. "Approximation of bivariate copulas by patched bivariate Fréchet copulas," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 246-256, March.
    13. van Dijk, Wilco W. & van der Pligt, Joop, 1997. "The Impact of Probability and Magnitude of Outcome on Disappointment and Elation," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 277-284, March.
    14. Said Khalil, 2022. "Expectile-based capital allocation," Working Papers hal-03816525, HAL.
    15. Enrico G. De Giorgi & Thierry Post, 2011. "Loss Aversion with a State-Dependent Reference Point," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1094-1110, June.
    16. López-Díaz, María Concepción & López-Díaz, Miguel, 2013. "A note on the family of extremality stochastic orders," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 230-236.
    17. van Dijk, W.W. & Zeelenberg, M. & van der Pligt, J., 1999. "Not having what you want versus having what you don't want : The impact of the type of negative outcome on the experience of disappointment and related emotions," Other publications TiSEM 5d1661b1-db82-4773-8ac4-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    18. Olivier Chanel & Graciela Chichilnisky, 2009. "The influence of fear in decisions: Experimental evidence," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 271-298, December.
    19. Denuit, Michel & Hieber, Peter & Robert, Christian Y., 2021. "Mortality credits within large survivor funds," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2021038, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    20. Nam, Hee Seok & Tang, Qihe & Yang, Fan, 2011. "Characterization of upper comonotonicity via tail convex order," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 368-373, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:165:y:2020:i:c:s0167715220301516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.