IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v72y2011i1p6-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ironic technology: Old age and the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in US health care

Author

Listed:
  • Kaufman, Sharon R.
  • Mueller, Paul S.
  • Ottenberg, Abigale L.
  • Koenig, Barbara A.

Abstract

We take the example of cardiac devices, specifically the implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or ICD, to explore the complex cultural role of technology in medicine today. We focus on persons age 80 and above, for whom ICD use is growing in the U.S. We highlight an ironic feature of this device. While it postpones death and 'saves' life by thwarting a lethal heart rhythm, it also prolongs living in a state of dying from heart failure. In that regard the ICD is simultaneously a technology of life extension and dying. We explore that irony among the oldest age group -- those whose considerations of medical interventions are framed by changing societal assumptions of what constitutes premature death, the appropriate time for death and medicine's goals in an aging society. Background to the rapidly growing use of this device among the elderly is the 'technological imperative' in medicine, bolstered today by the value given to evidence-based studies. We show how evidence contributes to standards of care and to the expansion of Medicare reimbursement criteria. Together, those factors shape the ethical necessity of physicians offering and patients accepting the ICD in late life. Two ethnographic examples document the ways in which those factors are lived in treatment discussions and in expectations about death and longevity.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaufman, Sharon R. & Mueller, Paul S. & Ottenberg, Abigale L. & Koenig, Barbara A., 2011. "Ironic technology: Old age and the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in US health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 6-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:72:y:2011:i:1:p:6-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(10)00766-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Victor R. Fuchs, 1972. "The Growing Demand for Medical Care," NBER Chapters, in: Essays in the Economics of Health and Medical Care, pages 61-68, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Sharon R. Kaufman & Janet K. Shim & Ann J. Russ, 2006. "Old Age, Life Extension, and the Character of Medical Choice," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 61(4), pages 175-184.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duberstein, Paul R. & Hoerger, Michael & Norton, Sally A. & Mohile, Supriya & Dahlberg, Britt & Hyatt, Erica Goldblatt & Epstein, Ronald M. & Wittink, Marsha N., 2023. "The TRIBE model: How socioemotional processes fuel end-of-life treatment in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    2. R Havemann & S van der Berg, 2003. "The Demand for Health Care in South Africa," Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 1-27, December.
    3. Steven F. Koch, 2017. "User Fee Abolition and the Demand for Public Health Care," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 85(2), pages 242-258, June.
    4. Finn McGuire & Noemi Kreif & Peter C. Smith, 2021. "The effect of distance on maternal institutional delivery choice: Evidence from Malawi," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(9), pages 2144-2167, September.
    5. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i::p:7-22 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Robert Kemp, 2007. "Medical Dominance and Institutional Change in the Delivery of Health Care Services," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 36(1), pages 43-51, April.
    7. Pierre-Jean Lancry & Valérie Paris, 1997. "Âge, temps et normes : une analyse de la prescription pharmaceutique," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 129(3), pages 173-187.
    8. Burson, Randall C. & Familusi, Olivia O. & Clapp, Justin T., 2022. "Imagining the ‘structural’ in medical education and practice in the United States: A curricular investigation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    9. David H. Howard & Yu-Chu Shen, 2011. "Comparative Effectiveness Research, COURAGE, and Technological Abandonment," NBER Working Papers 17371, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Panos Kanavos & Olivier Wouters & Aris Angelis & David Tordrup & Panos Kanavos, 2017. "Is the Funding of Public National Health Systems Sustainable over the Long Term? Evidence from Eight OECD Countries," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8(s2), pages 7-22, March.
    11. Lori Harwood & Alexander M Clark, 2014. "Dialysis modality decision‐making for older adults with chronic kidney disease," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(23-24), pages 3378-3390, December.
    12. Carl Hampus Lyttkens, 1999. "Imperatives in Health Care: Implications for Social Welfare and Medical Technology," Nordic Journal of Political Economy, Nordic Journal of Political Economy, vol. 25, pages 95-114.
    13. Carter, Celina & Mohammed, Shan & Upshur, Ross & Kontos, Pia, 2021. "Biomedicalization of end-of-life conversations with medically frail older adults - Malleable and senescent bodies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    14. Steven F. Koch, 2012. "The Abolition of User Fees and the Demand for Health Care: Re-evaluating the Impact," Working Papers 301, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    15. Robert Kemp, 2007. "Medical Dominance and Institutional Change in the Delivery of Health Care Services," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 43-51, January.
    16. Fisher, Jill A. & Monahan, Torin, 2011. "The "biosecuritization" of healthcare delivery: Examples of post-9/11 technological imperatives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(4), pages 545-552, February.
    17. Steven F. Koch, 2013. "User Fee Abolition in South Africa: Re-Evaluating the Impact?," Working Papers 201331, University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.
    18. Glazer, Amihai & Rothenberg, Lawrence S., 1999. "Increased capacity may exacerbate rationing problems: with applications to medical care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 669-678, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:72:y:2011:i:1:p:6-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.