IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v64y2007i11p2272-2284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychosocial sequelae of cesarean delivery: Review and analysis of their causes and implications

Author

Listed:
  • Lobel, Marci
  • DeLuca, Robyn Stein

Abstract

A growing number of children around the world are being born by surgical delivery, or cesarean section. Concerns over rising rates of cesareans have focused on the risk of death and medical complications associated with surgical delivery but have largely neglected psychosocial and behavioral factors that affect and are affected by cesarean delivery. We summarize research which indicates that women who deliver by cesarean section have more negative perceptions of their birth experience, their selves, and their infants, exhibit poorer parenting behaviors, and may be at higher risk for postpartum mood disturbance compared to women delivering infants vaginally. We also review evidence that suggests that cesareans adversely influence women's moods and perceptions by restricting the control that they can exercise over birth and by violating expectations about childbirth. Based on these findings, we recommend ways to reduce the aversiveness of cesareans, offer recommendations for future research, and discuss implications of escalating rates of cesareans, including medically non-indicated cesareans by request.

Suggested Citation

  • Lobel, Marci & DeLuca, Robyn Stein, 2007. "Psychosocial sequelae of cesarean delivery: Review and analysis of their causes and implications," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(11), pages 2272-2284, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:64:y:2007:i:11:p:2272-2284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(07)00077-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sargent, Carolyn & Stark, Nancy, 1987. "Surgical birth: Interpretations of cesarean delivery among private hospital patients and nursing staff," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 25(12), pages 1269-1276, January.
    2. Rosenberg, T.J. & Garbers, S. & Lipkind, H. & Chiasson, M.A., 2005. "Maternal obesity and diabetes as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: Differences among 4 racial/ethnic groups," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(9), pages 1545-1551.
    3. Kabakian-Khasholian, Tamar & Campbell, Oona & Shediac-Rizkallah, Mona & Ghorayeb, Françoise, 2000. "Women's experiences of maternity care: satisfaction or passivity?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 103-113, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Judith Aris-Meijer & Claudi Bockting & Ronald Stolk & Tjitte Verbeek & Chantal Beijers & Mariëlle van Pampus & Huibert Burger, 2019. "What If Pregnancy Is Not Seventh Heaven? The Influence of Specific Life Events during Pregnancy and Delivery on the Transition of Antenatal into Postpartum Anxiety and Depression," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-11, August.
    2. Mohammad Rifat Haider & Mohammad Masudur Rahman & Md Moinuddin & Ahmed Ehsanur Rahman & Shakil Ahmed & M Mahmud Khan, 2018. "Ever-increasing Caesarean section and its economic burden in Bangladesh," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Tonei, Valentina, 2019. "Mother’s mental health after childbirth: Does the delivery method matter?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 182-196.
    4. Chen, Chin-Shyan & Liu, Tsai-Ching & Chen, Bradley & Lin, Chung-Liang, 2014. "The failure of financial incentive? The seemingly inexorable rise of cesarean section," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 47-51.
    5. Grant, Darren, 2022. "The “Quiet Revolution” and the cesarean section in the United States," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    6. Shen, Menghan & Li, Linyan, 2020. "Differences in Cesarean section rates by fetal sex among Chinese women in the United States: Does Chinese culture play a role?," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    7. Nagle, Amanda & Samari, Goleen, 2021. "State-level structural sexism and cesarean sections in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    8. Annika Karlström & Regina Engström‐Olofsson & Astrid Nystedt & Mats Sjöling & Ingegerd Hildingsson, 2010. "Women’s postoperative experiences before and after the introduction of spinal opioids in anaesthesia for caesarean section," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(9‐10), pages 1326-1334, May.
    9. Surana, Mitul & Dongre, Ambrish, 2018. "Too much care? Private health care sector and surgical interventions during childbirth in India," IIMA Working Papers WP 2018-11-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    10. Rosenthal, Lisa & Lobel, Marci, 2011. "Explaining racial disparities in adverse birth outcomes: Unique sources of stress for Black American women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(6), pages 977-983, March.
    11. Leone, Tiziana & Padmadas, Sabu S. & Matthews, Zoë, 2008. "Community factors affecting rising caesarean section rates in developing countries: An analysis of six countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(8), pages 1236-1246, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mitchell, Ellen M.H. & Kwizera, Amata & Usta, Momade & Gebreselassie, Hailemichael, 2010. "Choosing early pregnancy termination methods in Urban Mozambique," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 62-70, July.
    2. Kabakian-Khasholian, Tamar & Kaddour, Afamia & DeJong, Jocelyn & Shayboub, Rawan & Nassar, Anwar, 2007. "The policy environment encouraging C-section in Lebanon," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(1), pages 37-49, September.
    3. Charles L. Baum II, 2010. "The Effects of Food Stamps on Weight Gained by Expectant Mothers," Working Papers 201002, Middle Tennessee State University, Department of Economics and Finance.
    4. Sparks, P. Johnelle, 2009. "Do biological, sociodemographic, and behavioral characteristics explain racial/ethnic disparities in preterm births?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(9), pages 1667-1675, May.
    5. Brown, Susan D. & Ehrlich, Samantha F. & Kubo, Ai & Tsai, Ai-Lin & Hedderson, Monique M. & Quesenberry, Charles P. & Ferrara, Assiamira, 2016. "Lifestyle behaviors and ethnic identity among diverse women at high risk for type 2 diabetes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 87-93.
    6. Christie Sennott & Sadé L. Lindsay & Brian C. Kelly & Mike Vuolo, 2022. "The Liberalization of Cannabis Possession Laws and Birth Outcomes: A State-Level Fixed Effects Analysis, 2003–2019," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(4), pages 1809-1829, August.
    7. Elisabete Alves & Sofia Correia & Henrique Barros & Ana Azevedo, 2012. "Prevalence of self-reported cardiovascular risk factors in Portuguese women: a survey after delivery," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 57(5), pages 837-847, October.
    8. Anca Cotet & Lee C. Spector, 2012. "The Impact of Diabetes Mandates on Infant Health," Working Papers 201204, Ball State University, Department of Economics, revised Sep 2012.
    9. Anca M. Grecu & Lee C. Spector, 2015. "The impact of diabetes insurance mandates on infant health," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 81(4), pages 1040-1061, April.
    10. Laura M. Segal & Emily A. Gadola, 2008. "Generation O: Addressing Childhood Overweight before It's Too Late," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 615(1), pages 195-213, January.
    11. Charles Baum, 2012. "The effects of food stamp receipt on weight gained by expectant mothers," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 25(4), pages 1307-1340, October.
    12. El-Nemer, Amina & Downe, Soo & Small, Neil, 2006. "'She would help me from the heart': An ethnography of Egyptian women in labour," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 81-92, January.
    13. Weiqin Li & Cuiping Zhang & Junhong Leng & Ping Shao & Huiguang Tian & Fuxia Zhang & Ling Dong & Zhijie Yu & Juliana C N Chan & Gang Hu & Ping Zhang & Xilin Yang, 2020. "Within-trial cost-effectiveness of lifestyle intervention using a 3-tier shared care approach for pregnancy outcomes in Chinese women with gestational diabetes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(8), pages 1-10, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:64:y:2007:i:11:p:2272-2284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.