IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v60y2005i3p501-513.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Individual and district scale determinants of users' satisfaction with primary health care in developing countries

Author

Listed:
  • Atkinson, Sarah
  • Haran, Dave

Abstract

The paper has two aims: to explore possible determinants of user satisfaction based on a broad conception of the health care system involving both individual and district scale variables, and to add to the limited knowledge and empirical study about such determinants in developing countries. The study was carried out in one of Brazil's poorest states, Ceará, in the northeast of the country. Brazil has a policy of an increased role for the population in management together with decentralised management to the local administrative (município) scale. For user views on health care to be useful in management, understanding their determinants needs to explore not only individual scale factors but also influences from the local health system and wider society, here termed district scale factors. The study design took different angles on users' satisfaction to build three measures: the particular health event (termed perceived quality); a generalised perception (termed satisfaction); and, satisfaction with the Community Health Worker (termed CHW satisfaction). Potential determinants explored at the individual scale (17 variables) are grouped into: socio-demographic and economic characteristics; health outcome; health care provision; and, awareness of space for local voice in planning. Potential determinants explored at the district scale (50 variables) are grouped into: formal organisation and management (health system inputs, management capacity, outputs and outcomes); informal organisation (population awareness of health system activities, staff characteristics, district management style); and, local political culture (geographic and socio-economic population profile, commitment to the district of local leaders, norms and values of staff regarding practice). Three determinants were key for all three user evaluation measures: getting an appointment, getting better, and the type of district (rural-urban). Our primary conclusion from this study is that there are limitations to the extent that user satisfaction can fulfill the claims made for it. On a more positive note, with these limitations noted, user satisfaction can prove a useful management tool more modestly at a local, context-specific scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Atkinson, Sarah & Haran, Dave, 2005. "Individual and district scale determinants of users' satisfaction with primary health care in developing countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 501-513, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:60:y:2005:i:3:p:501-513
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(04)00262-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linder-Pelz, Susie, 1982. "Social psychological determinants of patient satisfaction: A test of five hypotheses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 583-589, January.
    2. Nguyen Thi, Phi Linh & Briancon, S. & Empereur, F. & Guillemin, F., 2002. "Factors determining inpatient satisfaction with care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 493-504, February.
    3. Sitzia, John & Wood, Neil, 1997. "Patient satisfaction: A review of issues and concepts," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(12), pages 1829-1843, December.
    4. Bernhart, Michael H. & Wiadnyana, I. G. P. & Wihardjo, Haryoko & Pohan, Imbalos, 1999. "Patient satisfaction in developing countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 989-996, April.
    5. Calnan, Michael, 1988. "Towards a conceptual framework of lay evaluation of health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 27(9), pages 927-933, January.
    6. Thomas, Richard & Evans, Sherrill & Gately, Claire & Stordy, Joe & Huxley, Peter & Rogers, Anne & Robson, Brian, 2002. "State-event relations among indicators of susceptibility to mental distress in Wythenshawe in the UK," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 55(6), pages 921-935, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rita Bastião & Nuno de Sousa Pereira, 2020. "Performance in the Delivery of Primary Health Care Services: A Longitudinal Analysis," CEF.UP Working Papers 2002, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    2. Luck, J. & Peabody, J.W. & DeMaria, L.M. & Alvarado, C.S. & Menon, R., 2014. "Patient and provider perspectives on quality and health system effectiveness in a transition economy: Evidence from Ukraine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 57-65.
    3. Chukwuani, Chinyere Mercellina & Olugboji, Akindeji & Akuto, Edward Erdorga & Odebunmi, Akim & Ezeilo, Ezenta & Ugbene, Emmanuel, 2006. "A baseline survey of the Primary Healthcare System in South Eastern Nigeria," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(2), pages 182-201, July.
    4. Atkinson, Sarah & Medeiros, Regianne L., 2009. "Explanatory models of influences on the construction and expression of user satisfaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2089-2096, June.
    5. Zacharia S. Masanyiwa & Anke Niehof & Catrien J. A. M. Termeer, 2015. "A gendered users′ perspective on decentralized primary health services in rural Tanzania," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 285-306, July.
    6. Le, Nga & Groot, Wim & Tomini, Sonila & Tomini, Florian, 2018. "Health insurance and patient satisfaction: Evidence from the poorest regions of Vietnam," MERIT Working Papers 2018-040, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    7. Park, Kisoo & Park, Jumin & Kwon, Young Dae & Kang, Yoonjeong & Noh, Jin-Won, 2016. "Public satisfaction with the healthcare system performance in South Korea: Universal healthcare system," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(6), pages 621-629.
    8. repec:rre:publsh:v:39:y:2009:i:2:p:213-25 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hekkert, Karin Dorieke & Cihangir, Sezgin & Kleefstra, Sophia Martine & van den Berg, Bernard & Kool, Rudolf Bertijn, 2009. "Patient satisfaction revisited: A multilevel approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 68-75, July.
    2. Lannes, Laurence, 2015. "Improving health worker performance: The patient-perspective from a PBF program in Rwanda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-11.
    3. Atkinson, Sarah & Medeiros, Regianne L., 2009. "Explanatory models of influences on the construction and expression of user satisfaction," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2089-2096, June.
    4. Vanacore, Amalia & Pellegrino, Maria Sole, 2021. "Testing inter-group ranking heterogeneity: do patient characteristics matter for prioritization of quality improvements in healthcare service?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    5. Dyer, Thomas Anthony & Owens, Janine & Robinson, Peter Glenn, 2014. "The acceptability of care delegation in skill-mix: The salience of trust," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 170-178.
    6. Radin, Dagmar, 2013. "Does corruption undermine trust in health care? Results from public opinion polls in Croatia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 46-53.
    7. Mpinga, Emmanuel Kabengele & Chastonay, Philippe, 2011. "Satisfaction of patients: A right to health indicator?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 144-150.
    8. Park, Kisoo & Park, Jumin & Kwon, Young Dae & Kang, Yoonjeong & Noh, Jin-Won, 2016. "Public satisfaction with the healthcare system performance in South Korea: Universal healthcare system," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(6), pages 621-629.
    9. Broome, Kieran & Worrall, Linda & Fleming, Jennifer & Boldy, Duncan, 2012. "Evaluation of flexible route bus transport for older people," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 85-91.
    10. Hyojung Tak & Gregory Ruhnke & Ya-Chen Shih, 2015. "The Association between Patient-Centered Attributes of Care and Patient Satisfaction," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 8(2), pages 187-197, April.
    11. Sohail, Mohammad, 2005. "Accessibility and Quality of Government Primary Health Care: Achievement and Constraints," Bangladesh Development Studies, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), vol. 31(3-4), pages 63-98, Sept-Dec.
    12. Halim, Paisal, 2017. "Patient Satisfaction Level at Local General Hospital in Mamuju Regency, Indonesia," OSF Preprints 8xhqp, Center for Open Science.
    13. Waleed Al Nadabi & Mohammed A Mohammed, 2019. "Arabic Language Surveys Measuring Mothers’ Satisfaction During Childbirth: A Review," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(6), pages 169-169, June.
    14. Thomas, Richard & Evans, Sherrill & Huxley, Peter & Gately, Claire & Rogers, Anne, 2005. "Housing improvement and self-reported mental distress among council estate residents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(12), pages 2773-2783, June.
    15. Stefan Meinzer & Johann Prenninger & Patrick Vesel & Johannes Kornhuber & Judith Volmer & Joachim Hornegger & Björn M. Eskofier, 2016. "Translating satisfaction determination from health care to the automotive industry," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 10(4), pages 651-685, December.
    16. Meesala, Appalayya & Paul, Justin, 2018. "Service quality, consumer satisfaction and loyalty in hospitals: Thinking for the future," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 261-269.
    17. Willemijn van Dolen & Charles B. Weinberg, 2019. "An Empirical Investigation of Factors Affecting Perceived Quality and Well-Being of Children Using an Online Child Helpline," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-11, June.
    18. Ángel Fernández Pérez & Ángeles Sánchez Domínguez, 2017. "Los factores no clínicos como determinantes de la satisfacción con el sistema sanitario público en España," FEG Working Paper Series 01/17, Faculty of Economics and Business (University of Granada).
    19. Murante, Anna Maria & Vainieri, Milena & Rojas, Diana & Nuti, Sabina, 2014. "Does feedback influence patient - professional communication? Empirical evidence from Italy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(2), pages 273-280.
    20. Valérie Buthion & Nathalie Dumet & Stéphanie Verfay-Bertaud & Mélissa Amate & Nathalie Havet, 2018. "EFFICARD - L’organisation des soins et la vie avec l’insuffisance cardiaque Etude exploratoire sur les interactions entre les patients et leur prise en charge," Working Papers hal-01989323, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:60:y:2005:i:3:p:501-513. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.