IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v287y2021ics0277953621003877.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing competition in the hip implant industry in the light of recent policy guidance

Author

Listed:
  • Davies, Charlotte
  • Davies, Stephen

Abstract

NHS procurement is a highly topical area, attracting a great deal of recent policy focus. The pivotal report by Lord Carter of Coles (2016) highlighted unwarranted variation, estimating it to be worth approximately £5bn in efficiency savings. In relation to hip replacement surgery, recent procurement policy guidance has recommended the use of cemented hip implants for all patients aged 68 years and over in England and Wales. Previous work established that the hip implant supplying market was very concentrated, with only a few large suppliers, especially for cemented implants. The advocated major shift towards cemented implants would almost certainly increase further the market share of the dominant manufacturer of cemented sector thus raising potential competition and welfare issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Davies, Charlotte & Davies, Stephen, 2021. "Assessing competition in the hip implant industry in the light of recent policy guidance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:287:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621003877
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953621003877
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baier, Natalie & Sax, Lisa-Marie & Sundmacher, Leonie, 2019. "Trends and regional variation in rates of orthopaedic surgery in Germany: the impact of competition," Munich Reprints in Economics 78239, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    2. Peter Zweifel, 2017. "Competition in the healthcare sector: a missing dimension," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(2), pages 135-138, March.
    3. Natalie Baier & Lisa-Marie Sax & Leonie Sundmacher, 2019. "Trends and regional variation in rates of orthopaedic surgery in Germany: the impact of competition," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 20(1), pages 163-174, February.
    4. Vengberg, Sofie & Fredriksson, Mio & Winblad, Ulrika, 2019. "Patient choice and provider competition – Quality enhancing drivers in primary care?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 217-224.
    5. Walter Beckert & Elaine Kelly, 2017. "Divided by choice? Private providers, patient choice and hospital sorting in the English National Health service," IFS Working Papers W17/15, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    6. Matias Covarrubias & Germán Gutiérrez & Thomas Philippon, 2019. "From Good to Bad Concentration? US Industries over the Past 30 Years," NBER Chapters, in: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2019, volume 34, pages 1-46, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Beckert, Walter, 2018. "Choice in the presence of experts: The role of general practitioners in patients’ hospital choice," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 98-117.
    8. Anne‐Fleur Roos & Ramsis R. Croes & Victoria Shestalova & Marco Varkevisser & Frederik T. Schut, 2019. "Price effects of a hospital merger: Heterogeneity across health insurers, hospital products, and hospital locations," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(9), pages 1130-1145, September.
    9. Propper, Carol, 2018. "Competition in health care: lessons from the English experience," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(3-4), pages 492-508, July.
    10. Pedro Pita Barros & Werner B. F. Brouwer & Sarah Thomson & Marco Varkevisser, 2016. "Competition among health care providers: helpful or harmful?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(3), pages 229-233, April.
    11. Jillian Chown & David Dranove & Craig Garthwaite & Jordan Keener, 2019. "The Opportunities and Limitations of Monopsony Power in Healthcare: Evidence from the United States and Canada," NBER Working Papers 26122, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charlotte Davies, 2020. "The supply side to procurement in a health market: competition and innovation in hip implants," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2020-01, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    2. Marie Dreger & Hauke Langhoff & Cornelia Henschke, 2022. "Adoption of large-scale medical equipment: the impact of competition in the German inpatient sector," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(5), pages 791-805, July.
    3. Fernández-Pérez, Ángel & Jiménez-Rubio, Dolores & Robone, Silvana, 2022. "Freedom of choice and health services’ performance: Evidence from a national health system," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(12), pages 1283-1290.
    4. Gilbert Cette & Lorraine Koehl & Thomas Philippon, 2019. "The Labor Share in the Long Term: A Decline?," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 510-511-5, pages 35-51.
    5. Bryson, Joanna J. & Malikova, Helena & Garbe, Lisa & Backovsky, David, 2023. "Big Telcos Aren’t Necessarily Better: A Case Study of EU versus US Market Concentration," SocArXiv m42uh, Center for Open Science.
    6. Jeffrey Clemens & Joshua D. Gottlieb & Jeffrey Hicks, 2021. "How Would Medicare for All Affect Health System Capacity? Evidence from Medicare for Some," Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 35(1), pages 225-262.
    7. Daniel Avdic & Tugba Bueyuekdurmus & Giuseppe Moscelli & Adam Pilny & Ieva Sriubaite, 2018. "Subjective and objective quality reporting and choice of hospital: Evidence from maternal care services in Germany," CINCH Working Paper Series 1803, Universitaet Duisburg-Essen, Competent in Competition and Health.
    8. Fernández-Villaverde, Jesús & Mandelman, Federico & Yu, Yang & Zanetti, Francesco, 2021. "The “Matthew effect” and market concentration: Search complementarities and monopsony power," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 62-90.
    9. Emilio Colombo & Alberto Marcato, 2021. "Skill Demand and Labour Market Concentration: Theory and Evidence from Italian Vacancies," DISEIS - Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo dis2104, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimento di Economia internazionale, delle istituzioni e dello sviluppo (DISEIS).
    10. Sveréus, Sofia & Kjellsson, Gustav & Rehnberg, Clas, 2018. "Socioeconomic distribution of GP visits following patient choice reform and differences in reimbursement models: Evidence from Sweden," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(9), pages 949-956.
    11. Ferrando, Annalisa & McAdam, Peter & Petroulakis, Filippos & Vives, Xavier, 2021. "Product market structure and monetary policy: evidence from the Euro Area," Working Paper Series 2632, European Central Bank.
    12. Hjelmar, Ulf & Bhatti, Yosef & Petersen, Ole Helby & Rostgaard, Tine & Vrangbæk, Karsten, 2018. "Public/private ownership and quality of care: Evidence from Danish nursing homes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 41-49.
    13. Naudé, Wim, 2020. "From the Entrepreneurial to the Ossified Economy: Evidence, Explanations and a New Perspective," GLO Discussion Paper Series 539, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    14. Zhang, Mengdan & Zhang, Chonghui & Shi, Qiule & Zeng, Shouzhen & Balezentis, Tomas, 2022. "Operationalizing the telemedicine platforms through the social network knowledge: An MCDM model based on the CIPFOHW operator," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    15. Vengberg, Sofie & Fredriksson, Mio & Winblad, Ulrika, 2019. "Patient choice and provider competition – Quality enhancing drivers in primary care?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 217-224.
    16. Visa Pitkänen & Signe Jauhiainen & Ismo Linnosmaa, 2020. "Low risk, high reward? Repeated competitive biddings with multiple winners in health care," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(4), pages 483-500, June.
    17. Lodge, David & Pérez, Javier J. & Albrizio, Silvia & Everett, Mary & De Bandt, Olivier & Georgiadis, Georgios & Ca' Zorzi, Michele & Lastauskas, Povilas & Carluccio, Juan & Parrága, Susana & Carvalho,, 2021. "The implications of globalisation for the ECB monetary policy strategy," Occasional Paper Series 263, European Central Bank.
    18. Chen, Qiulin & Xu, Duo & Fu, Hongqiao & Yip, Winnie, 2022. "Distance effects and home bias in patient choice on the Internet: Evidence from an online healthcare platform in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Steven Callander & Dana Foarta & Takuo Sugaya, 2022. "Market Competition and Political Influence: An Integrated Approach," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(6), pages 2723-2753, November.
    20. Claudia Fontanari & Antonella Palumbo, 2023. "Permanent scars: The effects of wages on productivity," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(2), pages 351-389, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:287:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621003877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.