IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v284y2021ics0277953621005487.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Tasmanian Conception to Community (C2C) Study Database 2008-09 to 2013-14: Using linked health administrative data to address each piece in the puzzle

Author

Listed:
  • Neil, Amanda L.
  • Chappell, Kate
  • Wagg, Fiona
  • Miller, April
  • Judd, Fiona

Abstract

Tasmania, Australia has a small widely dispersed regional and rural population. The Conception to Community (C2C) Study Database was established as a research platform to inform service planning and policy development and improve health outcomes for Tasmanian mothers and children. The aims of this study were to establish by maternal socio-demographic characteristics: 1) the distribution of births in Tasmania; 2) hospital utilisation for children from birth to 5-years; and 3) the association between child and maternal emergency department (ED) presentation rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil, Amanda L. & Chappell, Kate & Wagg, Fiona & Miller, April & Judd, Fiona, 2021. "The Tasmanian Conception to Community (C2C) Study Database 2008-09 to 2013-14: Using linked health administrative data to address each piece in the puzzle," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:284:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621005487
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114216
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953621005487
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114216?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Padgett, Deborah K. & Brodsky, Beth, 1992. "Psychosocial factors influencing non-urgent use of the emergency room: A review of the literature and recommendations for research and improved service delivery," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 1189-1197, November.
    2. Sarah Sinclair & Jonathan Boymal & Ashton De Silva, 2012. "A Re‐Appraisal of the Fertility Response to the Australian Baby Bonus," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 88(s1), pages 78-87, June.
    3. Soril, Lesley J.J. & Leggett, Laura E. & Lorenzetti, Diane L. & Noseworthy, Tom W. & Clement, Fiona M., 2016. "Characteristics of frequent users of the emergency department in the general adult population: A systematic review of international healthcare systems," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(5), pages 452-461.
    4. Dong Hyun Seo & Min Joung Kim & Kyung Hwan Kim & Junseok Park & Dong Wun Shin & Hoon Kim & Woochan Jeon & Hyunjong Kim & Joon Min Park, 2018. "The characteristics of pediatric emergency department visits in Korea: An observational study analyzing Korea Health Panel data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-10, May.
    5. Gavin M Rudge & Mohammed A Mohammed & Sally C Fillingham & Alan Girling & Khesh Sidhu & Andrew J Stevens, 2013. "The Combined Influence of Distance and Neighbourhood Deprivation on Emergency Department Attendance in a Large English Population: A Retrospective Database Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-8, July.
    6. Hélène Colineaux & Fanny Le Querrec & Laure Pourcel & Jean-Christophe Gallart & Olivier Azéma & Thierry Lang & Michelle Kelly-Irving & Sandrine Charpentier & Sébastien Lamy, 2018. "Is the use of emergency departments socially patterned?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(3), pages 397-407, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mengni Chen & Chris J Lloyd & Paul S F Yip, 2018. "A new method of identifying target groups for pronatalist policy applied to Australia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Micaela Bassford & Hayley Fisher, 2020. "The Impact of Paid Parental Leave on Fertility Intentions," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 96(315), pages 402-430, December.
    3. Gaitz, Jason & Schurer, Stefanie, 2017. "Bonus Skills: Examining the Effect of an Unconditional Cash Transfer on Child Human Capital Formation," IZA Discussion Papers 10525, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Man Jiang & Guang Yang & Lvying Fang & Jin Wan & Yinghua Yang & Ying Wang, 2018. "Factors associated with healthcare utilization among community-dwelling elderly in Shanghai, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Veazie, Peter & Denham, Alina, 2021. "Understanding how psychosocial factors relate to seeking medical care among older adults using a new model of care seeking," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    6. Hélène Colineaux & Fanny Le Querrec & Laure Pourcel & Jean-Christophe Gallart & Olivier Azéma & Thierry Lang & Michelle Kelly-Irving & Sandrine Charpentier & Sébastien Lamy, 2018. "Is the use of emergency departments socially patterned?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(3), pages 397-407, April.
    7. Genevieve E O'Connor, 2016. "Investigating the significance of insurance and income on health service utilization across generational cohorts," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 19-33, March.
    8. Suzanne Bonner & Dipanwita Sarkar, 2020. "Who responds to fertility-boosting incentives? Evidence from pro-natal policies in Australia," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 42(18), pages 513-548.
    9. Magdalena Smyk & Joanna Tyrowicz & Lucas van der Velde, 2021. "A Cautionary Note on the Reliability of the Online Survey Data: The Case of Wage Indicator," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 50(1), pages 429-464, February.
    10. Roberts, Emilie & Mays, Nicholas, 1998. "Can primary care and community-based models of emergency care substitute for the hospital accident and emergency (A & E) department?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 191-214, June.
    11. Nerina Vecchio & Nicholas Rohde, 2017. "The effect of inadequate access to healthcare services on emergency room visits in Australia," Discussion Papers in Economics economics:201708, Griffith University, Department of Accounting, Finance and Economics.
    12. de Boer, Angela G. E. M. & Wijker, Wouter & de Haes, Hanneke C. J. M., 1997. "Predictors of health care utilization in the chronically ill: a review of the literature," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 101-115, November.
    13. Krzysztof Makarski & Joanna Tyrowicz & Magda Malec, 2018. "Evaluating welfare and economic effects of raised fertility," GRAPE Working Papers 25, GRAPE Group for Research in Applied Economics.
    14. Sinclair, Sarah & Boymal, Jonathan & de Silva, Ashton J, 2012. "Is the fertility response to the Australian baby bonus heterogeneous across maternal age? Evidence from Victoria," MPRA Paper 42725, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Krzysztof Makarski & Joanna Tyrowicz & Magda Malec, 2019. "Fiscal and Welfare Effects of Raised Fertility in Poland: Overlapping Generations Model Estimates," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 45(4), pages 795-818, December.
    16. Jérôme Adda & Christian Dustmann & Katrien Stevens, 2017. "The Career Costs of Children," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 125(2), pages 293-337.
    17. Lega, Federico & Mengoni, Alessandro, 2008. "Why non-urgent patients choose emergency over primary care services? Empirical evidence and managerial implications," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(2-3), pages 326-338, December.
    18. de Gendre, Alexandra & Lynch, John & Meunier, Aurélie & Pilkington, Rhiannon & Schurer, Stefanie, 2021. "Child Health and Parental Responses to an Unconditional Cash Transfer at Birth," IZA Discussion Papers 14693, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Eiman Jahangir & Vilma Irazola & Adolfo Rubinstein, 2012. "Need, Enabling, Predisposing, and Behavioral Determinants of Access to Preventative Care in Argentina: Analysis of the National Survey of Risk Factors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-6, September.
    20. Fan Elliott & Maitra Pushkar, 2013. "Women Rule: Preferences and Fertility in Australian Households," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-30, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:284:y:2021:i:c:s0277953621005487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.