IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v268y2021ics0277953620307905.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pay to skip the line: The political economy of digital testing services for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections

Author

Listed:
  • MacKinnon, Kinnon R.
  • Mykhalovskiy, Eric
  • Worthington, Catherine
  • Gómez-Ramírez, Oralia
  • Gilbert, Mark
  • Grace, Daniel

Abstract

The value of digital healthcare has been lauded in Canada at local, provincial, and national levels. Digital medicine is purported to enhance patient access to care while promising cost savings. Using institutional ethnography, we examined the potential for publicly funded digital testing for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STI) in Ontario, Canada. Our analyses draw from 23 stakeholder interviews with healthcare professionals conducted between 2019 and 2020, and textual analyses of government documents and private, for-profit digital healthcare websites. We uncovered a “two-tiered” system whereby private digital STI testing services enable people with economic resources to “pay to skip the line” queuing at public clinics and proceed directly to provide samples for diagnostics at local private medical labs. In Ontario, private lab corporations compete for fee-for-service contracts with government, which in turn organises opportunities for market growth when more patient samples are collected vis-à-vis digital testing. However, we also found that some infectious disease specimens (e.g., HIV) are re-routed for analysis at government public health laboratories, who may be unable to manage the increase in testing volume associated with digital STI testing due to state budget constraints. Our findings on public-private laboratory funding disparities thus discredit the claims that digital healthcare necessarily generates cost savings, or that it enhances patients’ access to care. We conclude that divergent state funding relations together with the creeping privatisation of healthcare within this “universal” system coordinate the conditions through which private corporations capitalise from digital STI testing, compounding patient access inequities. We also stress that our findings bring forth large scale implications given the context of the global COVID-19 pandemic, the rapid diffusion of digital healthcare, together with significant novel coronavirus testing activities initiated by private industry.

Suggested Citation

  • MacKinnon, Kinnon R. & Mykhalovskiy, Eric & Worthington, Catherine & Gómez-Ramírez, Oralia & Gilbert, Mark & Grace, Daniel, 2021. "Pay to skip the line: The political economy of digital testing services for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:268:y:2021:i:c:s0277953620307905
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953620307905
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113571?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Loozen, Edith M.H., 2015. "Public healthcare interests require strict competition enforcement," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(7), pages 882-888.
    2. Deborah Lupton, 2014. "Apps as Artefacts: Towards a Critical Perspective on Mobile Health and Medical Apps," Societies, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Bambra, Clare & Smith, Katherine E. & Pearce, Jamie, 2019. "Scaling up: The politics of health and place," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 36-42.
    4. Fox, Nick & Ward, Katie & O'Rourke, Alan, 2005. "The birth of the e-clinic. Continuity or transformation in the UK governance of pharmaceutical consumption?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(7), pages 1474-1484, October.
    5. Katy M E Turner & Katharine J Looker & Jonathan Syred & Adam Zienkiewicz & Paula Baraitser, 2019. "Online testing for sexually transmitted infections: A whole systems approach to predicting value," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Petsoulas, Christina & Allen, Pauline & Hughes, David & Vincent-Jones, Peter & Roberts, Jennifer, 2011. "The use of standard contracts in the English National Health Service: A case study analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 185-192, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brydges, Ryan & Nemoy, Lori & Campbell, Doug M. & Meffe, Filomena & Moscovitch, Linda & Fella, Sabina & Chandrasekaran, Nirmala & Bishop, Catherine & Khodadoust, Nazanin & Ng, Stella L., 2021. "“We can't just have a casual conversation”: An institutional ethnography-informed study of work in labour and birth," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saukko, Paula M. & Reed, Matthew & Britten, Nicky & Hogarth, Stuart, 2010. "Negotiating the boundary between medicine and consumer culture: Online marketing of nutrigenetic tests," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 744-753, March.
    2. Shih, Patti & Prokopovich, Kathleen & Degeling, Chris & Street, Jacqueline & Carter, Stacy M., 2022. "Direct-to-consumer detection of atrial fibrillation in a smartwatch electrocardiogram: Medical overuse, medicalisation and the experience of consumers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    3. van den Hurk, Martijn & Verhoest, Koen, 2017. "On the fast track? Using standard contracts in public–private partnerships for sports facilities: A case study," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 226-239.
    4. Chandeni S. Gajadien & Peter J. G. Dohmen & Frank Eijkenaar & Frederik T. Schut & Erik M. Raaij & Richard Heijink, 2023. "Financial risk allocation and provider incentives in hospital–insurer contracts in The Netherlands," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(1), pages 125-138, February.
    5. Peter Congdon, 2020. "Geographical Aspects of Recent Trends in Drug-Related Deaths, with a Focus on Intra-National Contextual Variation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Albani, Viviana & Brown, Heather & Vera-Toscano, Esperanza & Kingston, Andrew & Eikemo, Terje Andreas & Bambra, Clare, 2022. "Investigating the impact on mental wellbeing of an increase in pensions: A longitudinal analysis by area-level deprivation in England, 1998–2002," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    7. Albani, Viviana & Welsh, Claire E. & Brown, Heather & Matthews, Fiona E. & Bambra, Clare, 2022. "Explaining the deprivation gap in COVID-19 mortality rates: A decomposition analysis of geographical inequalities in England," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    8. Krachler, Nick & Greer, Ian, 2015. "When does marketisation lead to privatisation? Profit-making in English health services after the 2012 Health and Social Care Act," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 215-223.
    9. Wouter van der Schors & Marco Varkevisser, 2023. "Does Enforcement of the Cartel Prohibition in Healthcare Reflect Public and Political Attitudes Towards Competition? A Longitudinal Study From the Netherlands," Journal of Competition Law and Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 193-219.
    10. Jones, Lorelei & Exworthy, Mark & Frosini, Francesca, 2013. "Implementing market-based reforms in the English NHS: Bureaucratic coping strategies and social embeddedness," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(1), pages 52-59.
    11. Sarah Karlsberg-Schaffer;Jon Sussex;Yan Feng, 2015. "Incentives to follow Best Practice in Health Care," Briefing 001583, Office of Health Economics.
    12. Margaret Machniak Sommervold & Maja Van der Velden, 2017. "Visions of Illness, Disease, and Sickness in Mobile Health Applications," Societies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-18, October.
    13. Motulsky, Aude & Sicotte, Claude & Lamothe, Lise & Winslade, Nancy & Tamblyn, Robyn, 2011. "Electronic prescriptions and disruptions to the jurisdiction of community pharmacists," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 121-128, July.
    14. Petrakaki, Dimitra & Hilberg, Eva & Waring, Justin, 2018. "Between empowerment and self-discipline: Governing patients' conduct through technological self-care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 146-153.
    15. Lupton, Deborah & Jutel, Annemarie, 2015. "‘It's like having a physician in your pocket!’ A critical analysis of self-diagnosis smartphone apps," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 128-135.
    16. Eleonora Fichera & Hugh Gravelle & Mario Pezzino & Matt Sutton, 2012. "Specification of financial incentives for quality in health care contracts," Economics Discussion Paper Series 1218, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    17. Simone Fullagar & Emma Rich & Jessica Francombe-Webb & Antonio Maturo, 2017. "Digital Ecologies of Youth Mental Health: Apps, Therapeutic Publics and Pedagogy as Affective Arrangements," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-14, November.
    18. Martijn Hurk, 2016. "Learning to contract in public–private partnerships for road infrastructure: recent experiences in Belgium," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 49(3), pages 309-333, September.
    19. Anna Matheson, 2020. "Health Inequality as a Large-Scale Outcome of Complex Social Systems: Lessons for Action on the Sustainable Development Goals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-11, April.
    20. Marco Varkevisser & Frédérique Franken & Stéphanie Geest & Erik Schut, 2023. "Competition and collaboration in health care: reconciling the irreconcilable? Lessons from The Netherlands," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(7), pages 1019-1021, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:268:y:2021:i:c:s0277953620307905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.