IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v201y2018icp71-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The becoming of methadone in Kenya: How an intervention's implementation constitutes recovery potential

Author

Listed:
  • Rhodes, Tim

Abstract

This analysis treats the recent introduction of methadone treatment in Kenya as a case of ‘evidence-making intervention’. Using 30 qualitative interviews with people in receipt of methadone treatment in Nairobi, Kenya, methadone's becoming is treated as an effect of its narrative and material implementations. The interviews are shown to enact a narrative of methadone recovery potential towards normalcy beyond addiction. Such recovery potential is materialised in practice through social interactions wherein methadone's embodied effects are seen to be believed. Here, the recovering body affects others' recovery potential. In a context of competing claims about methadone's effects, including the circulation of doubt about experimenting with methadone treatment, embodied methadone effect helps moderate the multiverse of methadone knowledge. The material dynamics of methadone treatment delivery also affect its recovery potential, with the methadone queue enacting a rationing of recovery hope. Here, the experience of methadone's implementation loops back to a life with drugs. I conclude that there is a coexistence of potentiality and actuality, a ‘methadone multiple’, produced through its narrative and material implementations.

Suggested Citation

  • Rhodes, Tim, 2018. "The becoming of methadone in Kenya: How an intervention's implementation constitutes recovery potential," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 71-79.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:201:y:2018:i:c:p:71-79
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.02.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953618300637
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.02.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rhodes, Tim & Bernays, Sarah & Houmoller, Kathrin, 2010. "Parents who use drugs: Accounting for damage and its limitation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(8), pages 1489-1497, October.
    2. Lancaster, K. & Seear, K. & Treloar, C. & Ritter, A., 2017. "The productive techniques and constitutive effects of ‘evidence-based policy’ and ‘consumer participation’ discourses in health policy processes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 60-68.
    3. McIntosh, James & McKeganey, Neil, 2000. "Addicts' narratives of recovery from drug use: constructing a non-addict identity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 50(10), pages 1501-1510, May.
    4. Wood, Martin & Ferlie, Ewan & Fitzgerald, Louise, 1998. "Achieving clinical behaviour change: a case of becoming indeterminate," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 47(11), pages 1729-1738, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rhodes, Tim & Lancaster, Kari, 2019. "Evidence-making interventions in health: A conceptual framing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Collins, Alexandra B. & Boyd, Jade & Cooper, Hannah L.F. & McNeil, Ryan, 2019. "The intersectional risk environment of people who use drugs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 234(C), pages 1-1.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radcliffe, Polly, 2011. "Motherhood, pregnancy, and the negotiation of identity: The moral career of drug treatment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(6), pages 984-991, March.
    2. Hennessy, Emily A. & Tanner-Smith, Emily E. & Nichols, Lindsey M. & Brown, Tiffany B. & Mcculloch, Bryce J., 2021. "A multi-site study of emerging adults in collegiate recovery programs at public institutions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    3. Nettleton, Sarah & Neale, Joanne & Pickering, Lucy, 2011. "Techniques and transitions: A sociological analysis of sleeping practices amongst recovering heroin users," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(8), pages 1367-1373, April.
    4. Hennessy, Emily A. & Nichols, Lindsey M. & Brown, Tiffany B. & Tanner-Smith, Emily E., 2022. "Advancing the science of evaluating Collegiate Recovery Program processes and outcomes: A recovery capital perspective," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Rhodes, Tim & Lancaster, Kari, 2019. "Evidence-making interventions in health: A conceptual framing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1-1.
    6. O'Connor, Louise & Forrester, Donald & Holland, Sally & Williams, Annie, 2014. "Perspectives on children's experiences in families with parental substance misuse and child protection interventions," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 66-74.
    7. Bullinger, Lindsey Rose & Wing, Coady, 2019. "How many children live with adults with opioid use disorder?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Rashidian, Arash & Eccles, Martin P. & Russell, Ian, 2008. "Falling on stony ground A qualitative study of implementation of clinical guidelines' prescribing recommendations in primary care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 148-161, February.
    9. John Boswell, 2014. "‘Hoisted with our own petard’: evidence and democratic deliberation on obesity," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 47(4), pages 345-365, December.
    10. Rhodes, Tim & Bernays, Sarah & Houmoller, Kathrin, 2010. "Parents who use drugs: Accounting for damage and its limitation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(8), pages 1489-1497, October.
    11. Jonas, Adam B. & Young, April M. & Oser, Carrie B. & Leukefeld, Carl G. & Havens, Jennifer R., 2012. "OxyContin® as currency: OxyContin® use and increased social capital among rural Appalachian drug users," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(10), pages 1602-1609.
    12. Gueta, Keren, 2017. "A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators in treating drug use among Israeli mothers: An intersectional perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 155-163.
    13. Beard, Renée L. & Fox, Patrick J., 2008. "Resisting social disenfranchisement: Negotiating collective identities and everyday life with memory loss," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 1509-1520, April.
    14. Järvinen, Margaretha, 2017. "From wanting to willing – controlled drug use as a treatment goal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 69-76.
    15. Gloria H. Y. Chan & T. Wing Lo & Cherry H. L. Tam & Gabriel K. W. Lee, 2019. "Intrinsic Motivation and Psychological Connectedness to Drug Abuse and Rehabilitation: The Perspective of Self-Determination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Butler, Clare, 2019. "Working the 'wise’ in speech and language therapy: Evidence-based practice, biopolitics and ‘pastoral labour’," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 1-8.
    17. Lambert, Helen, 2006. "Accounting for EBM: Notions of evidence in medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 2633-2645, June.
    18. Mykhalovskiy, Eric & Armstrong, Pat & Armstrong, Hugh & Bourgeault, Ivy & Choiniere, Jackie & Lexchin, Joel & Peters, Suzanne & White, Jerry, 2008. "Qualitative research and the politics of knowledge in an age of evidence: Developing a research-based practice of immanent critique," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 195-203, July.
    19. William McGovern & Michelle Addison & Ruth McGovern, 2021. "An Exploration of the Psycho-Social Benefits of Providing Sponsorship and Supporting Others in Traditional 12 Step, Self-Help Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-12, February.
    20. Radcliffe, Polly & Stevens, Alex, 2008. "Are drug treatment services only for 'thieving junkie scumbags'? Drug users and the management of stigmatised identities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1065-1073, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:201:y:2018:i:c:p:71-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.