IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v133y2015icp85-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Best of enemies: Using social network analysis to explore a policy network in European smoke-free policy

Author

Listed:
  • Weishaar, Heide
  • Amos, Amanda
  • Collin, Jeff

Abstract

Networks and coalitions of stakeholders play a crucial role in the development and implementation of policies, with previous research highlighting that networks in tobacco control are characterised by an antagonism between supporters and opponents of comprehensive tobacco control policies. This UK-based study used quantitative and qualitative network analysis (drawing on 176 policy submissions and 32 interviews) to systematically map and analyse a network of actors involved in the development of European Union (EU) smoke-free policy. Policy debates were dominated by two coalitions of stakeholders with starkly opposing positions on the issue. One coalition, consisting primarily of health-related organisations, supported comprehensive EU smoke-free policy, whereas the other, led by tobacco manufacturers' organisations, opposed the policy initiative. The data suggest that, aided by strong political commitment of EU decision makers to develop smoke-free policy, advocates supporting comprehensive EU policy were able to frame policy debates in ways which challenged the tobacco industry's legitimacy. They then benefited from the stark polarisation between the two coalitions. The paper provides empirical evidence of the division between two distinct coalitions in tobacco policy debates and draws attention to the complex processes of consensus-seeking, alliance-building and strategic action which are integral to the development of EU policy. Highlighting network polarisation and industry isolation as factors which seemed to increase tobacco control success, the study demonstrates the potential significance and value of FCTC article 5.3 for tobacco control policy-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Weishaar, Heide & Amos, Amanda & Collin, Jeff, 2015. "Best of enemies: Using social network analysis to explore a policy network in European smoke-free policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 85-92.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:133:y:2015:i:c:p:85-92
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953615001987
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel Harrison & Julia Hurst, 2005. "The Unwelcome Guest: How Scotland invited the tobacco industry to smoke outside," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt3db9j76q, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    2. Bitton, Asaf & Neuman, Mark D. & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2002. "Tobacco Industry Attempts to Subvert European Union Tobacco Advertising Legislation," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt3r1334mz, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    3. David Marsh & Martin Smith, 2000. "Understanding Policy Networks: towards a Dialectical Approach," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 48(1), pages 4-21, March.
    4. Hans-Ulrich Derlien & B. Guy Peters, 2008. "Introduction: The State at Work," Chapters, in: Hans-Ulrich Derlien & B. Guy Peters (ed.), The State at Work, Volume 1, chapter 1, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Katherine E Smith & Gary Fooks & Jeff Collin & Heide Weishaar & Sema Mandal & Anna B Gilmore, 2010. "“Working the System”—British American Tobacco's Influence on the European Union Treaty and Its Implications for Policy: An Analysis of Internal Tobacco Industry Documents," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Peter Fredman & Kreg Lindberg, 2008. "Introduction," Tourism Economics, , vol. 14(2), pages 245-247, June.
    7. Grüning, T. & Gilmore, A.B. & McKee, M., 2006. "Tobacco industry influence on science and scientists in Germany," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(1), pages 20-32.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cao, Wanpeng & Du, Debin & Xia, Qifan, 2023. "Unbalanced global vaccine product trade pattern: A network perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    2. Weihua Su & Yuying Wang & Lan Qian & Shouzhen Zeng & Tomas Baležentis & Dalia Streimikiene, 2019. "Creating a Sustainable Policy Framework for Cross-Border E-Commerce in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Ozgul Calicioglu & Alessandro Flammini & Stefania Bracco & Lorenzo Bellù & Ralph Sims, 2019. "The Future Challenges of Food and Agriculture: An Integrated Analysis of Trends and Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Sarah Moreland-Russell & Bobbi J. Carothers, 2015. "An Examination of Two Policy Networks Involved in Advancing Smokefree Policy Initiatives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Han, Lu & Koenig-Archibugi, Mathias & Opsahl, Tore, 2018. "The social network of international health aid," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 67-74.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gary Fooks & Anna Gilmore & Jeff Collin & Chris Holden & Kelley Lee, 2013. "The Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility: Techniques of Neutralization, Stakeholder Management and Political CSR," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 283-299, January.
    2. Creutzburg, Leonard & Lieberherr, Eva, 2021. "To log or not to log? Actor preferences and networks in Swiss forest policy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. O'Toole, Kevin & Dennis, Jennifer & Kilpatrick, Sue & Farmer, Jane, 2010. "From passive welfare to community governance: Youth NGOs in Australia and Scotland," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 430-436, March.
    4. Reed, Matt, 2009. "For whom? - The governance of organic food and farming in the UK," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 280-286, June.
    5. Hanewinkel, Reiner & Isensee, Barbara, 2008. "Opinion on tobacco tax increase: Factors associated with individuals' support in Germany," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(2-3), pages 234-238, May.
    6. Chihcheng Lo, 2015. "Institutional Void And The Evolution Of Appropriability Regime - The Case Of The Transition Of Intellectual Property Rights Policy In Taiwan," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 2303747, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    7. Charles Mueller, 2014. "The Economics of the Brazilian Model of Agricultural Development author-name: Bernardo Mueller," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series iriba_wp01, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    8. Éric Montpetit, 2003. "Public Consultations in Policy Network Environments: The Case of Assisted Reproductive Technology Policy in Canada," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 29(1), pages 95-109, March.
    9. Emily Savell & Anna B Gilmore & Gary Fooks, 2014. "How Does the Tobacco Industry Attempt to Influence Marketing Regulations? A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-10, February.
    10. Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Lopolito, Antonio & Sica, Edgardo, 2019. "Instrument mix for energy transition: A method for policy formulation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    11. Reiner Hanewinkel & Christian Radden & Tobias Rosenkranz, 2008. "Price increase causes fewer sales of factory‐made cigarettes and higher sales of cheaper loose tobacco in Germany," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(6), pages 683-693, June.
    12. Katharina Reiss & Reinhard Schunck & Oliver Razum, 2015. "Effect of Length of Stay on Smoking among Turkish and Eastern European Immigrants in Germany—Interpretation in the Light of the Smoking Epidemic Model and the Acculturation Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Pope, Robin, 2009. "Risk starvation contributes to dementias and depressions: Whiffs of danger are the antidote," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 28/2009, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    14. José M. Barrutia & Carmen Echebarria, 2010. "Developing a New Framework to Explain Transverse Evolution of Knowledge‐Driven Regional Policy Networks," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 906-924, December.
    15. A. A. H. (Arnoud) Smit & Peter P. J. Driessen & Pieter Glasbergen, 2008. "Constraints on the conversion to sustainable production: the case of the Dutch potato chain," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(6), pages 369-381, September.
    16. Pope, Robin, 2009. "Risk Starvation Contributes to Dementias and Depressions: Whiffs of Danger Are the Antidote," Bonn Econ Discussion Papers 9/2009, University of Bonn, Bonn Graduate School of Economics (BGSE).
    17. Paul Bridgen & Traute Meyer, 2018. "Individualisation reversed: the cross-class politics of social regulation in the UK’s public/private pension mix," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 24(1), pages 25-41, February.
    18. Normann, Håkon Endresen, 2017. "Policy networks in energy transitions: The cases of carbon capture and storage and offshore wind in Norway," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 80-93.
    19. Colin Wight, 2003. "The Agent–Structure Problem and Institutional Racism," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 51(4), pages 706-721, December.
    20. Matthew Flinders, 2007. "Analysing Reform: The House of Commons, 2001–5," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 55(1), pages 174-200, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:133:y:2015:i:c:p:85-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.