IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v82y2022ipbs0038012122001161.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disaggregation of poverty indicators by small area methods for assessing the targeting of the “Reddito di Cittadinanza” national policy in Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Tonutti, Giovanni
  • Bertarelli, Gaia
  • Giusti, Caterina
  • Pratesi, Monica

Abstract

In Italy, a crucial anti-poverty policy “Reddito di Cittadinanza” (RdC), a measure of guaranteed minimum income, was introduced in April 2019. We aim to evaluate the targeting of the RdC policy at the local level, as aggregated analyses could mask important misalignments between the share of beneficiaries of the RdC and the share of poor households. To measure the poverty share in the local areas of interest, two main indicators to capture and monitor poverty are used in Europe: the At-Risk-of-Poverty Rate based on the EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions survey and the Absolute Poverty Index based on consumption data collected through the Household and Budget Survey. To obtain reliable estimates of these indicators at the local level, it is necessary to introduce small area estimation models that allow the use of data from different sources. We apply a bivariate Fay and Herriot model to provide reliable estimates of absolute and relative poverty for the assessment of RdC policy targeting in the 59 areas represented by the region by degree of urbanisation level in Italy. The degree of urbanisation is indeed a key geographical variable in the study of the poverty phenomenon. Our results suggest that the RdC policy implemented at the national level shows heterogeneous targeting performance at the local level, excluding large shares of poor households from the program. These findings yield a set of policy implications for improving the targeting of the measure.

Suggested Citation

  • Tonutti, Giovanni & Bertarelli, Gaia & Giusti, Caterina & Pratesi, Monica, 2022. "Disaggregation of poverty indicators by small area methods for assessing the targeting of the “Reddito di Cittadinanza” national policy in Italy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 82(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:82:y:2022:i:pb:s0038012122001161
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012122001161
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101327?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Coady & Margaret Grosh & John Hoddinott, 2004. "Targeting of Transfers in Developing Countries : Review of Lessons and Experience," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 14902, December.
    2. Massimo Baldini & Giovanni Gallo & Lorenzo Lusignoli & Stefano Toso, 2019. "Le politiche per l’assistenza: il Reddito di cittadinanza," Center for the Analysis of Public Policies (CAPP) 0166, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
    3. Rema Hanna & Benjamin A. Olken, 2018. "Universal Basic Incomes versus Targeted Transfers: Anti-Poverty Programs in Developing Countries," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 32(4), pages 201-226, Fall.
    4. Hanna, Rema & Olken, Benjamin A., 2018. "Universal Basic Incomes vs. Targeted Transfers: Anti-Poverty Programs in Developing Countries," Working Paper Series rwp18-024, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    5. Massimo Baldini & Giovanni Gallo & Lorenzo Lusignoli & Stefano Toso, 2019. "Le politiche per l’assistenza: il Reddito di cittadinanza," Department of Economics 0147, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    6. Janet Currie, 2004. "The Take Up of Social Benefits," NBER Working Papers 10488, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Nikos Tzavidis & Li‐Chun Zhang & Angela Luna & Timo Schmid & Natalia Rojas‐Perilla, 2018. "From start to finish: a framework for the production of small area official statistics," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 181(4), pages 927-979, October.
    8. David Coady, 2004. "Targeting Outcomes Redux," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 19(1), pages 61-85.
    9. Massimo Baldini & Stefano Toso & Paolo Bosi, 2002. "Targeting welfare in Italy: old problems and perspectives on reform," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 23(1), pages 51-75, March.
    10. Daniele Checchi & Giuseppe Pio Dachille & Maria De Paola, 2021. "Reddito di Cittadinanza, caratteristiche socio-economiche e capitale sociale (Citizens’ Income, socio-economic characteristics, and social capital)," Politica economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 1, pages 121-148.
    11. Dorota Weziak-Bialowolska, 2016. "Spatial Variation in EU Poverty with Respect to Health, Education and Living Standards," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 125(2), pages 451-479, January.
    12. Saraceno, Chiara, 2020. "Quando avere un lavoro non basta a proteggere dalla povertà," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, volume 20, number 228477, July.
    13. Li, Huilin & Lahiri, P., 2010. "An adjusted maximum likelihood method for solving small area estimation problems," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(4), pages 882-892, April.
    14. Nicola Curci & Giuseppe Grasso & Pasquale Recchia & Marco Savegnago, 2020. "Anti-poverty measures in Italy: a microsimulation analysis," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1298, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Della Guardia, Anne & Lake, Milli & Schnitzer, Pascale, 2022. "Selective inclusion in cash transfer programs: Unintended consequences for social cohesion," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    2. Stefanía D’Iorio & Liliana Forzani & Rodrigo García Arancibia & Ignacio Girela, 2023. "Predictive Power of Composite Socioeconomic Indices in Regression and Classification: Principal Components and Partial Least Squares," Working Papers 246, Red Nacional de Investigadores en Economía (RedNIE).
    3. Yuki Higuchi & Nobuhiko Fuwa & Kei Kajisa & Takahiro Sato & Yasuyuki Sawada, 2019. "Disaster Aid Targeting and Self-Reporting Bias: Natural Experimental Evidence from the Philippines," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Schnitzer,Pascale & Stoeffler,Quentin, 2021. "Targeting for Social Safety Nets : Evidence from Nine Programs in the Sahel," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9816, The World Bank.
    5. Tebogo B. Seleka, 2020. "Targetting Effectiveness of Social Transfer Programs in Botswana:Means-tested versus Categorical and Self-selected instruments," Working Papers 72, Botswana Institute for Development Policy Analysis.
    6. Haseeb, Muhammad & Vyborny, Kate, 2022. "Data, discretion and institutional capacity: Evidence from cash transfers in Pakistan," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    7. Brown, Caitlin & Ravallion, Martin & van de Walle, Dominique, 2018. "A poor means test? Econometric targeting in Africa," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 109-124.
    8. Mariapia Mendola & Mengesha Yayo Negasi, 2019. "Nutritional and Schooling Impact of a Cash Transfer Program in Ethiopia: A Retrospective Analysis of Childhood Experience," Development Working Papers 451, Centro Studi Luca d'Agliano, University of Milano.
    9. Stoeffler, Quentin & Mills, Bradford & del Ninno, Carlo, 2016. "Reaching the Poor: Cash Transfer Program Targeting in Cameroon," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 244-263.
    10. Martin Persson, U. & Alpízar, Francisco, 2013. "Conditional Cash Transfers and Payments for Environmental Services—A Conceptual Framework for Explaining and Judging Differences in Outcomes," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 124-137.
    11. Bachas, Pierre & Gadenne, Lucie & Jensen, Anders, 2020. "Informality, Consumption Taxes and Redistribution," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1277, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    12. Daniel Bjorkegren & Joshua E. Blumenstock & Samsun Knight, 2020. "Manipulation-Proof Machine Learning," Papers 2004.03865, arXiv.org.
    13. Emily Aiken & Suzanne Bellue & Dean Karlan & Christopher R. Udry & Joshua Blumenstock, 2021. "Machine Learning and Mobile Phone Data Can Improve the Targeting of Humanitarian Assistance," NBER Working Papers 29070, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Ali Enami & Ugo Gentilini & Patricio Larroulet & Nora Lustig & Emma Monsalve & Siyu Quan & Jamele Rigolini, 2023. "Universal Basic Income Programs: How Much Would Taxes Need to Rise? Evidence for Brazil, Chile, India, Russia, and South Africa," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(9), pages 1443-1463, September.
    15. Antonia Asenjo & Verónica Escudero & Hannah Liepmann, 2024. "Why Should we Integrate Income and Employment Support? A Conceptual and Empirical Investigation," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(1), pages 1-29, January.
    16. Christopher J. Johnstone, 2022. "Conceptualising inclusive development by identifying universality, plurality, sociality, and relationality," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(6), pages 1165-1175, August.
    17. Xie, Xiaoxia & Xie, Meichun & Jin, Huiying & Cheung, Shannon & Huang, Chien-Chung, 2020. "Financial support and financial well-being for vocational school students in China," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    18. Matteo Richiardi, 2018. "Editorial," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 11(2), pages 1-4.
    19. Abhijit Banerjee & Paul Niehaus & Tavneet Suri, 2019. "Universal Basic Income in the Developing World," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 959-983, August.
    20. Blumenstock, Joshua & Bjorkegren, Dan & Knight, Samsun, 2022. "(Machine) Learning What Policies Value," CEPR Discussion Papers 17364, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:82:y:2022:i:pb:s0038012122001161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.