IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v70y2014icp142-152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mean and turbulent kinetic energy budgets inside and above very large wind farms under conventionally-neutral condition

Author

Listed:
  • Abkar, Mahdi
  • Porté-Agel, Fernando

Abstract

In this study, large-eddy simulations (LES) is combined with a turbine model to investigate all the terms in the budgets of mean and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) inside and above very large wind farms. Emphasis is placed on quantifying the relative contribution of the thermal stratification in the free-atmosphere and wind-turbine spacing on the energy balance. The mean kinetic energy budget through the wind farms indicates that the magnitude of the kinetic energy entrainment form the free atmosphere into the boundary layer increases by increasing the density of the farms and decreasing the static stability in the free atmosphere, leading to larger power output from the wind farms. This entrainment is the only source of kinetic energy to balance that extracted by the turbines inside very large wind farms. In addition, it is shown that the distribution of the kinetic energy flux above the wind turbines, at top-tip level, is quite heterogeneous and its magnitude just behind the wind turbines is much larger due to the strong wind shear at that level. The simulation results also show that increasing the wind-farm density leads to an increase in the boundary-layer height, the ratio of the ageostrophic to the geostrophic velocity component inside the boundary layer, and the potential temperature near the surface. Detailed analysis of the TKE budget through the wind farms reveals also an important effect of the thermal stratification and wind turbine spacing on the magnitude and spatial distribution of the shear production, dissipation rate and transport terms. In particular, the shear production and dissipation rate have a peak at the turbine-top level, where the wind shear is largest, and their magnitude increases as the static stability in the free atmosphere and the wind-turbine spacing decrease.

Suggested Citation

  • Abkar, Mahdi & Porté-Agel, Fernando, 2014. "Mean and turbulent kinetic energy budgets inside and above very large wind farms under conventionally-neutral condition," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 142-152.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:70:y:2014:i:c:p:142-152
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148114002146
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.050?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mahdi Abkar & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2013. "The Effect of Free-Atmosphere Stratification on Boundary-Layer Flow and Power Output from Very Large Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-24, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mahdi Abkar & Jens Nørkær Sørensen & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2018. "An Analytical Model for the Effect of Vertical Wind Veer on Wind Turbine Wakes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Yang, Haoze & Ge, Mingwei & Abkar, Mahdi & Yang, Xiang I.A., 2022. "Large-eddy simulation study of wind turbine array above swell sea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    3. Amin Niayifar & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2016. "Analytical Modeling of Wind Farms: A New Approach for Power Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Tristan Revaz & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2021. "Large-Eddy Simulation of Wind Turbine Flows: A New Evaluation of Actuator Disk Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    5. Claire VerHulst & Charles Meneveau, 2015. "Altering Kinetic Energy Entrainment in Large Eddy Simulations of Large Wind Farms Using Unconventional Wind Turbine Actuator Forcing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Ka Ling Wu & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2017. "Flow Adjustment Inside and Around Large Finite-Size Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Jacob R. West & Sanjiva K. Lele, 2020. "Wind Turbine Performance in Very Large Wind Farms: Betz Analysis Revisited," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-25, March.
    8. Zhang, Huan & Ge, Mingwei & Liu, Yongqian & Yang, Xiang I.A., 2021. "A new coupled model for the equivalent roughness heights of wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 34-46.
    9. Liu, Wenyi, 2016. "Design and kinetic analysis of wind turbine blade-hub-tower coupled system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 547-557.
    10. Hornshøj-Møller, Simon D. & Nielsen, Peter D. & Forooghi, Pourya & Abkar, Mahdi, 2021. "Quantifying structural uncertainties in Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of wind turbine wakes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1550-1558.
    11. Sharma, V. & Cortina, G. & Margairaz, F. & Parlange, M.B. & Calaf, M., 2018. "Evolution of flow characteristics through finite-sized wind farms and influence of turbine arrangement," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1196-1208.
    12. Eidi, Ali & Ghiassi, Reza & Yang, Xiang & Abkar, Mahdi, 2021. "Model-form uncertainty quantification in RANS simulations of wakes and power losses in wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 2212-2223.
    13. Dar, Arslan Salim & Porté-Agel, Fernando, 2022. "Wind turbine wakes on escarpments: A wind-tunnel study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1258-1275.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacob R. West & Sanjiva K. Lele, 2020. "Wind Turbine Performance in Very Large Wind Farms: Betz Analysis Revisited," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-25, March.
    2. Ka Ling Wu & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2017. "Flow Adjustment Inside and Around Large Finite-Size Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    3. Rafael V. Rodrigues & Corinne Lengsfeld, 2019. "Development of a Computational System to Improve Wind Farm Layout, Part II: Wind Turbine Wakes Interaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-27, April.
    4. Amin Niayifar & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2016. "Analytical Modeling of Wind Farms: A New Approach for Power Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Tristan Revaz & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2021. "Large-Eddy Simulation of Wind Turbine Flows: A New Evaluation of Actuator Disk Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-22, June.
    6. Deepu Dilip & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2017. "Wind Turbine Wake Mitigation through Blade Pitch Offset," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Kevin A. Adkins & Adrian Sescu, 2022. "Wind Farms and Humidity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Jay P. Goit & Wim Munters & Johan Meyers, 2016. "Optimal Coordinated Control of Power Extraction in LES of a Wind Farm with Entrance Effects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Barlas, Emre & Wu, Ka Ling & Zhu, Wei Jun & Porté-Agel, Fernando & Shen, Wen Zhong, 2018. "Variability of wind turbine noise over a diurnal cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 791-800.
    10. Meyer Forsting, Alexander R. & Navarro Diaz, Gonzalo P. & Segalini, Antonio & Andersen, Søren J. & Ivanell, Stefan, 2023. "On the accuracy of predicting wind-farm blockage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 114-129.
    11. Jens Nørkær Sørensen & Gunner Christian Larsen, 2021. "A Minimalistic Prediction Model to Determine Energy Production and Costs of Offshore Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-27, January.
    12. Mahdi Abkar & Jens Nørkær Sørensen & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2018. "An Analytical Model for the Effect of Vertical Wind Veer on Wind Turbine Wakes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-10, July.
    13. Susumu Takakuwa & Takanori Uchida, 2022. "Improvement of Airflow Simulation by Refining the Inflow Wind Direction and Applying Atmospheric Stability for Onshore and Offshore Wind Farms Affected by Topography," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.
    14. Takanori Uchida & Susumu Takakuwa, 2020. "Numerical Investigation of Stable Stratification Effects on Wind Resource Assessment in Complex Terrain," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-32, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:70:y:2014:i:c:p:142-152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.