IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v50y2013icp47-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic response and power performance of a combined Spar-type floating wind turbine and coaxial floating wave energy converter

Author

Listed:
  • Muliawan, Made Jaya
  • Karimirad, Madjid
  • Moan, Torgeir

Abstract

Wind turbines need to be spaced at a distance of the order of 1 km apart to reduce the effect of aerodynamic wakes. To increase the density of the power production in the farm, the deployment of wave energy converters (WECs) in the spaces between FWTs could be considered. However, the cost of energy from WECs is still very large. Therefore, the deployments of the WECs will reduce the economic value of the total project. In the present paper, a combined concept involving a combination of Spar-type FWTs and an axi-symmetric two-body WECs is considered. Compared with segregated deployments of FWTs and WECs, this combined concept would imply reduced capital costs of the total project because it will reduce the number of power cables, mooring line and the structural mass of the WECs. However, the effect of the addition of a Torus (donut-shape heaving buoy) on the FWT's motions as well as the power production should first be investigated. In the present study, coupled (wave- and wind-induced response-mooring) analysis is performed using SIMO/TDHMILL3D in the time domain to study the motion behaviour of the combined concept and to estimate the power production from both FWT and WEC under operational conditions. Mooring tension in the combined concept is also compared with the mooring tension in the Spar-type FWT alone. Hydrodynamic loads are determined using HydroD. The validated simplified method called TDHMILL is implemented to calculate the aerodynamic forces as a function of the relative wind velocity. The analysis is performed for several operational conditions according to metocean data taken in the Statfjord field in the North Sea. Finally, the behaviour of the combined concept under operational conditions is assessed, and it is shown to result in a positive synergy between wind and wave energy generation in terms of both capital investment and power production.

Suggested Citation

  • Muliawan, Made Jaya & Karimirad, Madjid & Moan, Torgeir, 2013. "Dynamic response and power performance of a combined Spar-type floating wind turbine and coaxial floating wave energy converter," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 47-57.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:50:y:2013:i:c:p:47-57
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2012.05.025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148112003527
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2012.05.025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Babarit, A. & Hals, J. & Muliawan, M.J. & Kurniawan, A. & Moan, T. & Krokstad, J., 2012. "Numerical benchmarking study of a selection of wave energy converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 44-63.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhigang Liu & Jin Wang & Tao Tao & Ziyun Zhang & Siyi Chen & Yang Yi & Shuang Han & Yongqian Liu, 2023. "Wave Power Prediction Based on Seasonal and Trend Decomposition Using Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing and Dual-Channel Seq2Seq Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-17, November.
    2. Yu, Hui-Feng & Zhang, Yong-Liang & Zheng, Si-Ming, 2016. "Numerical study on the performance of a wave energy converter with three hinged bodies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1276-1286.
    3. Adrian De Andres & Jéromine Maillet & Jørgen Hals Todalshaug & Patrik Möller & David Bould & Henry Jeffrey, 2016. "Techno-Economic Related Metrics for a Wave Energy Converters Feasibility Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Morim, Joao & Cartwright, Nick & Hemer, Mark & Etemad-Shahidi, Amir & Strauss, Darrell, 2019. "Inter- and intra-annual variability of potential power production from wave energy converters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 1224-1241.
    5. Chenglong Guo & Wanan Sheng & Dakshina G. De Silva & George Aggidis, 2023. "A Review of the Levelized Cost of Wave Energy Based on a Techno-Economic Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-30, February.
    6. George Lavidas & Francesco De Leo & Giovanni Besio, 2020. "Blue Growth Development in the Mediterranean Sea: Quantifying the Benefits of an Integrated Wave Energy Converter at Genoa Harbour," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    7. Craig Jones & Grace Chang & Kaustubha Raghukumar & Samuel McWilliams & Ann Dallman & Jesse Roberts, 2018. "Spatial Environmental Assessment Tool (SEAT): A Modeling Tool to Evaluate Potential Environmental Risks Associated with Wave Energy Converter Deployments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Chen, Weixing & Lu, Yunfei & Li, Shaoxun & Gao, Feng, 2023. "A bio-inspired foldable-wing wave energy converter for ocean robots," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    9. Lavidas, George, 2019. "Energy and socio-economic benefits from the development of wave energy in Greece," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1290-1300.
    10. George Lavidas & Vengatesan Venugopal, 2018. "Energy Production Benefits by Wind and Wave Energies for the Autonomous System of Crete," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Manuel Corrales-Gonzalez & George Lavidas & Giovanni Besio, 2023. "Feasibility of Wave Energy Harvesting in the Ligurian Sea, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, June.
    12. Cheng, Zhengshun & Wen, Ting Rui & Ong, Muk Chen & Wang, Kai, 2019. "Power performance and dynamic responses of a combined floating vertical axis wind turbine and wave energy converter concept," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 190-204.
    13. Penalba, Markel & Ulazia, Alain & Ibarra-Berastegui, Gabriel & Ringwood, John & Sáenz, Jon, 2018. "Wave energy resource variation off the west coast of Ireland and its impact on realistic wave energy converters’ power absorption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 205-219.
    14. Ning, Dezhi & Zhao, Xuanlie & Göteman, Malin & Kang, Haigui, 2016. "Hydrodynamic performance of a pile-restrained WEC-type floating breakwater: An experimental study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 531-541.
    15. Siegel, Stefan G., 2019. "Numerical benchmarking study of a Cycloidal Wave Energy Converter," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 390-405.
    16. Lavidas, George & Venugopal, Vengatesan, 2017. "A 35 year high-resolution wave atlas for nearshore energy production and economics at the Aegean Sea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 401-417.
    17. Tom, N.M. & Lawson, M.J. & Yu, Y.H. & Wright, A.D., 2016. "Development of a nearshore oscillating surge wave energy converter with variable geometry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(PA), pages 410-424.
    18. Zheng, Siming & Zhang, Yongliang & Iglesias, Gregorio, 2020. "Concept and performance of a novel wave energy converter: Variable Aperture Point-Absorber (VAPA)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 681-700.
    19. Garcia-Teruel, Anna & DuPont, Bryony & Forehand, David I.M., 2020. "Hull geometry optimisation of wave energy converters: On the choice of the optimisation algorithm and the geometry definition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    20. Bertram, D.V. & Tarighaleslami, A.H. & Walmsley, M.R.W. & Atkins, M.J. & Glasgow, G.D.E., 2020. "A systematic approach for selecting suitable wave energy converters for potential wave energy farm sites," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:50:y:2013:i:c:p:47-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.