IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v189y2022icp164-179.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optical and thermal integration analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles with a particle-based solar thermal plant based on annual performance

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Rui
  • Romero, Manuel
  • González-Aguilar, José
  • Rovense, Francesco
  • Rao, Zhenghua
  • Liao, Shengming

Abstract

Central receiver concentrating solar power (CSP) plants based on particles as heat transfer fluid in solar circuits and supercritical CO2 (S–CO2) Brayton cycles can fulfil the requirements for next generation CSP to improve solar-to-electric efficiency and reduce energy storage costs. However, effective incorporation of these two concepts requires an in-depth understanding of their characteristics and an appropriate approach to match them. This paper addresses the importance of the design features and annualized performances of the optical subsystem (heliostat-receiver) and the thermal-to-electricity subsystem (solar receiver-energy storage-power block) on the global optimization of any integrated CSP plant. The analysis lies in a complete model of a particle-based CSP plant, which includes detailed modeling for the solar field, a cavity solar receiver with an up bubbling fluidized bed (UBFB) tubular panel, particles storage tanks and a recompression S–CO2 Brayton cycle. The design incident irradiance on the receiver aperture (IR) and the particles temperature at the receiver outlet (Tp) are identified as key parameters determining the solar-to-electric integration procedure and affecting the overall plant design and annual performance. Regarding subsystems located upstream and downstream of the receiver, the effects of heliostat and power block characteristics on the optimal IR and Tp are also evaluated, represented by the heliostat beam quality and main compressor inlet temperature. Results show that IR around 1,200–1,500 W/m2 provides the maximum system design efficiency and annual efficiency. Improvements on heliostat beam quality and power block efficiency help to increase the optimal IR and overall system efficiency. In the optimal range of IR, increasing Tp leads to higher system design efficiency, but lower system annual efficiency and annual electricity output. The optimal combination of IR and Tp contributes to a minimum heliostat design area, representing the integration trade-off between the system optical and thermal characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Rui & Romero, Manuel & González-Aguilar, José & Rovense, Francesco & Rao, Zhenghua & Liao, Shengming, 2022. "Optical and thermal integration analysis of supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles with a particle-based solar thermal plant based on annual performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 164-179.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:189:y:2022:i:c:p:164-179
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.02.059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148122002002
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2022.02.059?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linares, José I. & Montes, María J. & Cantizano, Alexis & Sánchez, Consuelo, 2020. "A novel supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton power cycle for power tower concentrating solar plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    2. Reyes-Belmonte, M.A. & Sebastián, A. & Romero, M. & González-Aguilar, J., 2016. "Optimization of a recompression supercritical carbon dioxide cycle for an innovative central receiver solar power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 17-27.
    3. Reyes-Belmonte, M.A. & Sebastián, A. & Spelling, J. & Romero, M. & González-Aguilar, J., 2019. "Annual performance of subcritical Rankine cycle coupled to an innovative particle receiver solar power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 786-795.
    4. He, Ya-Ling & Qiu, Yu & Wang, Kun & Yuan, Fan & Wang, Wen-Qi & Li, Ming-Jia & Guo, Jia-Qi, 2020. "Perspective of concentrating solar power," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    5. de la Calle, Alberto & Bayon, Alicia & Soo Too, Yen Chean, 2018. "Impact of ambient temperature on supercritical CO2 recompression Brayton cycle in arid locations: Finding the optimal design conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1016-1027.
    6. Ma, Yuegeng & Morozyuk, Tatiana & Liu, Ming & Yan, Junjie & Liu, Jiping, 2019. "Optimal integration of recompression supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle with main compression intercooling in solar power tower system based on exergoeconomic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1134-1154.
    7. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Off-design performance of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with a solar power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    8. Li, Xin & Kong, Weiqiang & Wang, Zhifeng & Chang, Chun & Bai, Fengwu, 2010. "Thermal model and thermodynamic performance of molten salt cavity receiver," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 981-988.
    9. Binotti, Marco & Astolfi, Marco & Campanari, Stefano & Manzolini, Giampaolo & Silva, Paolo, 2017. "Preliminary assessment of sCO2 cycles for power generation in CSP solar tower plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1007-1017.
    10. Ronny Gueguen & Benjamin Grange & Françoise Bataille & Samuel Mer & Gilles Flamant, 2020. "Shaping High Efficiency, High Temperature Cavity Tubular Solar Central Receivers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Zhang, Huili & Benoit, Hadrien & Perez-Lopèz, Inmaculada & Flamant, Gilles & Tan, Tianwei & Baeyens, Jan, 2017. "High-efficiency solar power towers using particle suspensions as heat carrier in the receiver and in the thermal energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 438-446.
    12. Mostafavi Tehrani, S. Saeed & Taylor, Robert A., 2016. "Off-design simulation and performance of molten salt cavity receivers in solar tower plants under realistic operational modes and control strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 698-715.
    13. Jing Liu & Yongqing He & Xianliang Lei, 2019. "Heat-Transfer Characteristics of Liquid Sodium in a Solar Receiver Tube with a Nonuniform Heat Flux," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miguel Angel Reyes-Belmonte & Francesco Rovense, 2022. "High-Efficiency Power Cycles for Particle-Based Concentrating Solar Power Plants: Thermodynamic Optimization and Critical Comparison," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "A review on integrated design and off-design operation of solar power tower system with S–CO2 Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    2. Rovense, Francesco & Reyes-Belmonte, Miguel Ángel & Romero, Manuel & González-Aguilar, José, 2022. "Thermo-economic analysis of a particle-based multi-tower solar power plant using unfired combined cycle for evening peak power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    3. Marta Muñoz & Antonio Rovira & María José Montes, 2022. "Thermodynamic cycles for solar thermal power plants: A review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), March.
    4. Merchán, R.P. & Santos, M.J. & Medina, A. & Calvo Hernández, A., 2022. "High temperature central tower plants for concentrated solar power: 2021 overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    5. Ma, Ning & Meng, Fugui & Hong, Wenpeng & Li, Haoran & Niu, Xiaojuan, 2023. "Thermodynamic assessment of the dry-cooling supercritical Brayton cycle in a direct-heated solar power tower plant enabled by CO2-propane mixture," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 649-663.
    6. Arias, I. & Cardemil, J. & Zarza, E. & Valenzuela, L. & Escobar, R., 2022. "Latest developments, assessments and research trends for next generation of concentrated solar power plants using liquid heat transfer fluids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    7. Xu, Zhen & Liu, Xinxin & Xie, Yingchun, 2023. "Off-design performances of a dry-cooled supercritical recompression Brayton cycle using CO2–H2S as working fluid," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    8. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2021. "Load matching and techno-economic analysis of CSP plant with S–CO2 Brayton cycle in CSP-PV-wind hybrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    9. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Off-design performance of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with a solar power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    10. Sleiti, Ahmad K. & Al-Ammari, Wahib A., 2021. "Off-design performance analysis of combined CSP power and direct oxy-combustion supercritical carbon dioxide cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 14-29.
    11. Zhang, Yifan & Li, Hongzhi & Li, Kailun & Yang, Yu & Zhou, Yujia & Zhang, Xuwei & Xu, Ruina & Zhuge, Weilin & Lei, Xianliang & Dan, Guangju, 2022. "Dynamic characteristics and control strategies of the supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle tailored for the new generation concentrating solar power," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    12. Correa, Faustino & Barraza, Rodrigo & Soo Too, Yen Chean & Vasquez Padilla, Ricardo & Cardemil, José M., 2021. "Optimized operation of recompression sCO2 Brayton cycle based on adjustable recompression fraction under variable conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    13. Sadeghi, Shayan & Ghandehariun, Samane, 2022. "A standalone solar thermochemical water splitting hydrogen plant with high-temperature molten salt: Thermodynamic and economic analyses and multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    14. Thanganadar, Dhinesh & Fornarelli, Francesco & Camporeale, Sergio & Asfand, Faisal & Patchigolla, Kumar, 2021. "Off-design and annual performance analysis of supercritical carbon dioxide cycle with thermal storage for CSP application," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    15. Bai, Wengang & Li, Hongzhi & Zhang, Xuwei & Qiao, Yongqiang & Zhang, Chun & Gao, Wei & Yao, Mingyu, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis of CO2–SF6 mixture working fluid supercritical Brayton cycle used for solar power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PB).
    16. Amani, Madjid & Ghenaiet, Adel, 2020. "Novel hybridization of solar central receiver system with combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    17. Ma, Yuegeng & Morosuk, Tatiana & Liu, Ming & Liu, Jiping, 2020. "Development and comparison of control schemes for the off-design operation of a recompression supercritical CO2 cycle with an intercooled main compressor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    18. Sebastián, Andrés & Abbas, Rubén & Valdés, Manuel & Casanova, Jesús, 2018. "Innovative thermal storage strategies for Fresnel-based concentrating solar plants with East-West orientation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 983-995.
    19. Zhang, Li & Fang, Jiabin & Wei, Jinjia & Yang, Guidong, 2017. "Numerical investigation on the thermal performance of molten salt cavity receivers with different structures," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 966-978.
    20. Jianfeng Lu & Yarong Wang & Jing Ding, 2020. "Nonuniform Heat Transfer Model and Performance of Molten Salt Cavity Receiver," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:189:y:2022:i:c:p:164-179. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.