IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v169y2018icp105-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model selection for degradation modeling and prognosis with health monitoring data

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen, Khanh T.P.
  • Fouladirad, Mitra
  • Grall, Antoine

Abstract

Health monitoring data are increasingly collected and widely used for reliability assessment and lifetime prediction. They not only provide information about degradation state but also could trace failure mechanisms of assets. The selection of a deterioration model that optimally fits in with health monitoring data is an important issue. It can enable a more precise asset health prognostic and help reducing operation and maintenance costs. Therefore, this paper aims to address the problem of degradation model selection including goals, procedure and evaluation criteria. Focusing on continuous degradation modeling including some currently used Lévy processes, the performance of classical and prognostic criteria are discussed through numerous numerical examples. We also investigate in what circumstances which methods perform better than others. The efficiency of a new hybrid criterion is highlighted that allows to take into account the information of goodness-of-fit of observation data when evaluating prognostic measure.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen, Khanh T.P. & Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine, 2018. "Model selection for degradation modeling and prognosis with health monitoring data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 105-116.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:169:y:2018:i:c:p:105-116
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.08.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832017302612
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2017.08.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Molini, A. & Talkner, P. & Katul, G.G. & Porporato, A., 2011. "First passage time statistics of Brownian motion with purely time dependent drift and diffusion," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(11), pages 1841-1852.
    2. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Wang, Wenbin & Hu, Chang-Hua & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2011. "Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Nishii, R., 1988. "Maximum likelihood principle and model selection when the true model is unspecified," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 392-403, November.
    4. Wiens, Trevor S. & Dale, Brenda C. & Boyce, Mark S. & Kershaw, G. Peter, 2008. "Three way k-fold cross-validation of resource selection functions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 212(3), pages 244-255.
    5. Peng, R. & Li, Y.F. & Zhang, W.J. & Hu, Q.P., 2014. "Testing effort dependent software reliability model for imperfect debugging process considering both detection and correction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 37-43.
    6. Zhi‐Sheng Ye & Min Xie, 2015. "Stochastic modelling and analysis of degradation for highly reliable products," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 16-32, January.
    7. Ariane Lorton & Mitra Fouladirad & Antoine Grall, 2013. "Computation of remaining useful life on a physic-based model and impact of a prognosis on the maintenance process," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(4), pages 434-449, August.
    8. Hans-Georg Müller & Ying Zhang, 2005. "Time-Varying Functional Regression for Predicting Remaining Lifetime Distributions from Longitudinal Trajectories," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 61(4), pages 1064-1075, December.
    9. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    10. Baussaron, Julien & Mihaela, Barreau & Léo, Gerville-Réache & Fabrice, Guérin & Paul, Schimmerling, 2014. "Reliability assessment based on degradation measurements: How to compare some models?," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 236-241.
    11. Wang, Xiao, 2010. "Wiener processes with random effects for degradation data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 340-351, February.
    12. Christian Paroissin & Ali Salami, 2014. "Failure Time of Non Homogeneous Gamma Process," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(15), pages 3148-3161, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li Sun & Fangchao Zhao & Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan & Honggen Zhou & Xiaohui Gu, 2021. "A nonlinear Wiener degradation model integrating degradation data under accelerated stresses and real operating environment," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(3), pages 356-373, June.
    2. Huynh, K.T., 2021. "An adaptive predictive maintenance model for repairable deteriorating systems using inverse Gaussian degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Liu, Xingheng & Matias, José & Jäschke, Johannes & Vatn, Jørn, 2022. "Gibbs sampler for noisy Transformed Gamma process: Inference and remaining useful life estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    4. Dinh, Duc-Hanh & Do, Phuc & Iung, Benoit, 2022. "Multi-level opportunistic predictive maintenance for multi-component systems with economic dependence and assembly/disassembly impacts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    5. Liu, Di & Wang, Shaoping, 2021. "An artificial neural network supported stochastic process for degradation modeling and prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    6. Chatenet, Q. & Remy, E. & Gagnon, M. & Fouladirad, M. & Tahan, A.S., 2021. "Modeling cavitation erosion using non-homogeneous gamma process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    7. Pedersen, Tom Ivar & Vatn, Jørn, 2022. "Optimizing a condition-based maintenance policy by taking the preferences of a risk-averse decision maker into account," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    8. Liu, Di & Wang, Shaoping & Cui, Xiaoyu, 2022. "An artificial neural network supported Wiener process based reliability estimation method considering individual difference and measurement error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 218(PB).
    9. Nguyen, Khanh T.P. & Medjaher, Kamal, 2019. "A new dynamic predictive maintenance framework using deep learning for failure prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 251-262.
    10. Qin, Zhiyuan & Naser, M.Z., 2023. "Machine learning and model driven bayesian uncertainty quantification in suspended nonstructural systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Song, Kai & Shi, Jian & Yi, Xiaojian, 2020. "A time-discrete and zero-adjusted gamma process model with application to degradation analysis," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 560(C).
    2. Song, Kai & Cui, Lirong, 2022. "A common random effect induced bivariate gamma degradation process with application to remaining useful life prediction," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    3. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    4. Xudan Chen & Guoxun Ji & Xinli Sun & Zhen Li, 2019. "Inverse Gaussian–based model with measurement errors for degradation analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(6), pages 1086-1098, December.
    5. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    6. Ling, M.H. & Ng, H.K.T. & Tsui, K.L., 2019. "Bayesian and likelihood inferences on remaining useful life in two-phase degradation models under gamma process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 77-85.
    7. Wang, Xiaolin & Balakrishnan, Narayanaswamy & Guo, Bo, 2014. "Residual life estimation based on a generalized Wiener degradation process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 13-23.
    8. Liu, Bin & Zhao, Xiujie & Liu, Guoquan & Liu, Yiqi, 2020. "Life cycle cost analysis considering multiple dependent degradation processes and environmental influence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    9. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    10. Pedersen, Tom Ivar & Vatn, Jørn, 2022. "Optimizing a condition-based maintenance policy by taking the preferences of a risk-averse decision maker into account," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    11. Peng, Weiwen & Li, Yan-Feng & Mi, Jinhua & Yu, Le & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2016. "Reliability of complex systems under dynamic conditions: A Bayesian multivariate degradation perspective," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 75-87.
    12. Dong, Qinglai & Cui, Lirong, 2019. "A study on stochastic degradation process models under different types of failure Thresholds," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 202-212.
    13. Ma, Xiaoyang & Liu, Bin & Yang, Li & Peng, Rui & Zhang, Xiaodong, 2020. "Reliability analysis and condition-based maintenance optimization for a warm standby cooling system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    14. Giovanni Rinaldi & Philipp R. Thies & Lars Johanning, 2021. "Current Status and Future Trends in the Operation and Maintenance of Offshore Wind Turbines: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, April.
    15. Zhang, Ao & Wang, Zhihua & Bao, Rui & Liu, Chengrui & Wu, Qiong & Cao, Shihao, 2023. "A novel failure time estimation method for degradation analysis based on general nonlinear Wiener processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    16. Zhang, Jian-Xun & Hu, Chang-Hua & He, Xiao & Si, Xiao-Sheng & Liu, Yang & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2017. "Lifetime prognostics for deteriorating systems with time-varying random jumps," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 338-350.
    17. Wang, Xiaolin & Liu, Bin & Zhao, Xiujie, 2021. "A performance-based warranty for products subject to competing hard and soft failures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    18. Chang, Miaoxin & Huang, Xianzhen & Coolen, Frank PA & Coolen-Maturi, Tahani, 2023. "New reliability model for complex systems based on stochastic processes and survival signature," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(3), pages 1349-1364.
    19. Liang, Qingzhu & Yang, Yinghao & Peng, Changhong, 2023. "A reliability model for systems subject to mutually dependent degradation processes and random shocks under dynamic environments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    20. Zhang, Jian-Xun & Si, Xiao-Sheng & Du, Dang-Bo & Hu, Chang-Hua & Hu, Chen, 2020. "A novel iterative approach of lifetime estimation for standby systems with deteriorating spare parts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:169:y:2018:i:c:p:105-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.