IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v250y2022ics092552732200202x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards industry 5.0: A multi-objective job rotation model for an inclusive workforce

Author

Listed:
  • Battini, Daria
  • Berti, Nicola
  • Finco, Serena
  • Zennaro, Ilenia
  • Das, Ajay

Abstract

The new Industry 5.0 paradigm complements the well-known Industry 4.0 approach by specifically driving research and innovation to facilitate the transition to sustainable, human-centric and resilient industry. In the manufacturing context, workers' diversity in terms of experience, productivity and physical capacity represents a significant challenge for companies, especially those characterized by high staff turnover and manual processes with high workload and poor ergonomics. In seeking to address such challenges, this research adopts a human-centric perspective to define new flexible job arrangements by developing a new multi-objective job rotation scheduling model. The proposed model is unique in that it aims to achieve multiple job assignment objectives by simultaneously considering different socio-technical factors: workers' experience, physical capacity and limitations, postural ergonomic risks, noise and vibration exposure, and workers' boredom. The model's implementation in real environments can be supported by new sensor-based technologies that collect data on workers' efficiency, ergonomic scores and task performance and enable workers to participate in measuring perceived fatigue and boredom. The primary goal of our model is to find the most appropriate assignment of job and individual-flexible rest-break plan for each worker. The authors test the model application in an industrial setting. Useful managerial insights emerge and prescriptive recommendations are provided.

Suggested Citation

  • Battini, Daria & Berti, Nicola & Finco, Serena & Zennaro, Ilenia & Das, Ajay, 2022. "Towards industry 5.0: A multi-objective job rotation model for an inclusive workforce," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:250:y:2022:i:c:s092552732200202x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108619
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092552732200202X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108619?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wipawee Tharmmaphornphilas & Bryan Norman, 2004. "A Quantitative Method for Determining Proper Job Rotation Intervals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 251-266, April.
    2. Marco Trost & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2022. "Social Sustainability in Production Planning: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-31, July.
    3. Digiesi, Salvatore & Kock, Ad A.A. & Mummolo, Giovanni & Rooda, Jacobus E., 2009. "The effect of dynamic worker behavior on flow line performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 368-377, August.
    4. Eduardo Duque-Grisales & Javier Aguilera-Caracuel, 2021. "Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 315-334, January.
    5. Mossa, G. & Boenzi, F. & Digiesi, S. & Mummolo, G. & Romano, V.A., 2016. "Productivity and ergonomic risk in human based production systems: A job-rotation scheduling model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P4), pages 471-477.
    6. Azizi, Nader & Zolfaghari, Saeed & Liang, Ming, 2010. "Modeling job rotation in manufacturing systems: The study of employee's boredom and skill variations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(1), pages 69-85, January.
    7. Serena Finco & Daria Battini & Xavier Delorme & Alessandro Persona & Fabio Sgarbossa, 2020. "Workers’ rest allowance and smoothing of the workload in assembly lines," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(4), pages 1255-1270, February.
    8. Omamuyovwi Gbejewoh & Saskia Keesstra & Erna Blancquaert, 2021. "The 3Ps (Profit, Planet, and People) of Sustainability amidst Climate Change: A South African Grape and Wine Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, March.
    9. Lucia Botti & Martina Calzavara & Cristina Mora, 2021. "Modelling job rotation in manufacturing systems with aged workers," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(8), pages 2522-2536, April.
    10. Tsan‐Ming Choi & Subodha Kumar & Xiaohang Yue & Hau‐Ling Chan, 2022. "Disruptive Technologies and Operations Management in the Industry 4.0 Era and Beyond," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 9-31, January.
    11. Vivek Vijayakumar & Fabio Sgarbossa & W. Patrick Neumann & Ahmad Sobhani, 2022. "Framework for incorporating human factors into production and logistics systems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(2), pages 402-419, January.
    12. Frank, Alejandro Germán & Dalenogare, Lucas Santos & Ayala, Néstor Fabián, 2019. "Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 15-26.
    13. Neumann, W. Patrick & Winkelhaus, Sven & Grosse, Eric H. & Glock, Christoph H., 2021. "Industry 4.0 and the human factor – A systems framework and analysis methodology for successful development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    14. Costa, Alysson M. & Miralles, Cristóbal, 2009. "Job rotation in assembly lines employing disabled workers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 625-632, August.
    15. Niloofar Katiraee & Martina Calzavara & Serena Finco & Daria Battini & Olga Battaïa, 2021. "Consideration of workers’ differences in production systems modelling and design: State of the art and directions for future research," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(11), pages 3237-3268, June.
    16. Sgarbossa, F. & Grosse, E. H. & Neumann, W. P. & Battini, D. & Glock, C. H., 2020. "Human factors in production and logistics systems of the future," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 120615, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    17. Berti, Nicola & Finco, Serena & Battaïa, Olga & Delorme, Xavier, 2021. "Ageing workforce effects in Dual-Resource Constrained job-shop scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    18. Bogataj, David & Battini, Daria & Calzavara, Martina & Persona, Alessandro, 2019. "The ageing workforce challenge: Investments in collaborative robots or contribution to pension schemes, from the multi-echelon perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 97-106.
    19. Sabina Asensio-Cuesta & Juan M. García-Gómez & José-Luis Poza-Luján & J. Alberto Conejero, 2019. "A Game-Theory Method to Design Job Rotation Schedules to Prevent Musculoskeletal Disorders Based on Workers’ Preferences and Competencies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-16, November.
    20. Jose Antonio Diego-Mas, 2020. "Designing Cyclic Job Rotations to Reduce the Exposure to Ergonomics Risk Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, February.
    21. Neumann, W. Patrick & Winkelhaus, Sven & Grosse, Eric H. & Glock, C. H., 2021. "Industry 4.0 and the human factor – A systems framework and analysis methodology for successful development," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 124757, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    22. Moreira, Mayron César O. & Costa, Alysson M., 2013. "Hybrid heuristics for planning job rotation schedules in assembly lines with heterogeneous workers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 552-560.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry, 2023. "Efficient resilience portfolio design in the supply chain with consideration of preparedness and recovery investments," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    2. Karmaker, Chitra Lekha & Bari, A.B.M. Mainul & Anam, Md. Zahidul & Ahmed, Tazim & Ali, Syed Mithun & de Jesus Pacheco, Diego Augusto & Moktadir, Md. Abdul, 2023. "Industry 5.0 challenges for post-pandemic supply chain sustainability in an emerging economy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    3. Mukherjee, Abheek Anjan & Raj, Alok & Aggarwal, Shikha, 2023. "Identification of barriers and their mitigation strategies for industry 5.0 implementation in emerging economies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 257(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2022. "Hybridizations in line balancing problems: A comprehensive review on new trends and formulations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    2. Berti, Nicola & Finco, Serena & Battaïa, Olga & Delorme, Xavier, 2021. "Ageing workforce effects in Dual-Resource Constrained job-shop scheduling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    3. Marco Trost & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2022. "Social Sustainability in Production Planning: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-31, July.
    4. Heuser, Patricia & Tauer, Björn, 2023. "Single-machine scheduling with product category-based learning and forgetting effects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Laubengaier, Désirée A. & Cagliano, Raffaella & Canterino, Filomena, 2022. "It Takes Two to Tango: Analyzing the Relationship between Technological and Administrative Process Innovations in Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    6. Mossa, G. & Boenzi, F. & Digiesi, S. & Mummolo, G. & Romano, V.A., 2016. "Productivity and ergonomic risk in human based production systems: A job-rotation scheduling model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(P4), pages 471-477.
    7. Battaïa, Olga & Dolgui, Alexandre, 2013. "A taxonomy of line balancing problems and their solutionapproaches," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 259-277.
    8. Moreira, Mayron César O. & Costa, Alysson M., 2013. "Hybrid heuristics for planning job rotation schedules in assembly lines with heterogeneous workers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(2), pages 552-560.
    9. Menti, Federica & Romero, David & Jacobsen, Peter, 2023. "A technology assessment and implementation model for evaluating socio-cultural and technical factors for the successful deployment of Logistics 4.0 technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    10. Olcay Polat & Can B. Kalayci & Özcan Mutlu & Surendra M. Gupta, 2016. "A two-phase variable neighbourhood search algorithm for assembly line worker assignment and balancing problem type-II: an industrial case study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 722-741, February.
    11. Pedota, Mattia & Grilli, Luca & Piscitello, Lucia, 2023. "Technology adoption and upskilling in the wake of Industry 4.0," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Ozdemir, Rifat & Sarigol, Ilkan & AlMutairi, Sarah & AlMeea, Sarah & Murad, Abrar & Naqi, Aseel & AlNasser, Noor, 2021. "Fuzzy multi-objective model for assembly line balancing with ergonomic risks consideration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    13. Cannavacciuolo, Lorella & Ferraro, Giovanna & Ponsiglione, Cristina & Primario, Simonetta & Quinto, Ivana, 2023. "Technological innovation-enabling industry 4.0 paradigm: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    14. Marco Trost & Thorsten Claus & Frank Herrmann, 2023. "Master Production Scheduling with Consideration of Utilization-Dependent Exhaustion and Capacity Load," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Jose Antonio Diego-Mas, 2020. "Designing Cyclic Job Rotations to Reduce the Exposure to Ergonomics Risk Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Huang, Kerry & Wang, Kedi & Lee, Peter K.C. & Yeung, Andy C.L., 2023. "The impact of industry 4.0 on supply chain capability and supply chain resilience: A dynamic resource-based view," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    17. Grybauskas, Andrius & Stefanini, Alessandro & Ghobakhloo, Morteza, 2022. "Social sustainability in the age of digitalization: A systematic literature Review on the social implications of industry 4.0," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    18. Belhadi, Amine & Kamble, Sachin S. & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Mani, Venkatesh & Khan, Syed Abdul Rehman & Touriki, Fatima Ezahra, 2022. "A self-assessment tool for evaluating the integration of circular economy and industry 4.0 principles in closed-loop supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    19. Battaïa, Olga & Delorme, Xavier & Dolgui, Alexandre & Hagemann, Johannes & Horlemann, Anika & Kovalev, Sergey & Malyutin, Sergey, 2015. "Workforce minimization for a mixed-model assembly line in the automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 489-500.
    20. Pabolu, Venkata Krishna Rao & Shrivastava, Divya & Kulkarni, Makarand S., 2022. "Modelling and prediction of worker task performance using a knowledge-based system application," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:250:y:2022:i:c:s092552732200202x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.