IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v557y2020ics0378437120304404.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Affinity-based extension of non-extensive entropy and statistical mechanics

Author

Listed:
  • Okamura, Keisuke

Abstract

Tsallis’ non-extensive entropy is extended to incorporate the dependence on affinities between the microstates of a system. At the core of our construction of the extended entropy (H) is the concept of the effective number of dissimilar states, termed the ‘effective diversity’ (Δ). It is a unique integrated measure derived from the probability distribution among states and the affinities between states. The effective diversity is related to the extended entropy through the Boltzmann’s-equation-like relation, H=lnqΔ, in terms of the Tsallis’ q-logarithm. A new principle called the Nesting Principle is established, stating that the effective diversity remains invariant under arbitrary grouping of the constituent states. It is shown that this invariance property holds only for q=2; however, the invariance is recovered for general q in the zero-affinity limit (i.e. the Tsallis and Boltzmann–Gibbs case). Using the affinity-based extended Tsallis entropy, the microcanonical and the canonical ensembles are constructed in the presence of general between-state affinities. It is shown that the classic postulate of equal a priori probabilities no longer holds but is modified by affinity-dependent terms. As an illustration, a two-level system is investigated by the extended canonical method, which manifests that the thermal behaviour of the thermodynamic quantities at equilibrium are affected by the between-state affinity. Furthermore, some applications and implications of the affinity-based extended diversity/entropy for information theory and biodiversity theory are addressed in appendices.

Suggested Citation

  • Okamura, Keisuke, 2020. "Affinity-based extension of non-extensive entropy and statistical mechanics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 557(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:557:y:2020:i:c:s0378437120304404
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2020.124849
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437120304404
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2020.124849?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Solow Andrew & Polasky Stephen & Broadus James, 1993. "On the Measurement of Biological Diversity," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 60-68, January.
    2. Steven Polasky & Andrew R. Solow, 1993. "Option Value, Gallot's Inequality, And The Measurement Of Biological Diversity," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 241, Boston College Department of Economics.
    3. T. Wada & A. M. Scarfone, 2005. "A non self-referential expression of Tsallis' probability distribution function," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 47(4), pages 557-561, October.
    4. Tsallis, Constantino & Mendes, RenioS. & Plastino, A.R., 1998. "The role of constraints within generalized nonextensive statistics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 534-554.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Perry, Neil, 2010. "The ecological importance of species and the Noah's Ark problem," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 478-485, January.
    2. Pavoine, Sandrine & Bonsall, Michael B., 2009. "Biological diversity: Distinct distributions can lead to the maximization of Rao’s quadratic entropy," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 75(2), pages 153-163.
    3. Yoshida, Jun & Kono, Tatsuhito, 2022. "Cities and biodiversity: Spatial efficiency of land use," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 685-705.
    4. Brei, Michael & Pérez-Barahona, Agustín & Strobl, Eric, 2016. "Environmental pollution and biodiversity: Light pollution and sea turtles in the Caribbean," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 95-116.
    5. Gerrit Ansmann & Tobias Bollenbach, 2021. "Building clone-consistent ecosystem models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-25, February.
    6. Courtois, Pierre & Figuières, Charles & Mulier, Chloe, 2019. "A Tale of Two Diversities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 133-147.
    7. Ricotta, Carlo & Szeidl, Laszlo, 2009. "Diversity partitioning of Rao’s quadratic entropy," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 76(4), pages 299-302.
    8. Suyari, Hiroki & Wada, Tatsuaki, 2008. "Multiplicative duality, q-triplet and (μ,ν,q)-relation derived from the one-to-one correspondence between the (μ,ν)-multinomial coefficient and Tsallis entropy Sq," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 387(1), pages 71-83.
    9. Paul, Prosenjit & Kar, T.K., 2016. "Impacts of invasive species on the sustainable use of native exploited species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 340(C), pages 106-115.
    10. Bartkowski, Bartosz & Lienhoop, Nele & Hansjürgens, Bernd, 2015. "Capturing the complexity of biodiversity: A critical review of economic valuation studies of biological diversity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-14.
    11. Simpson, R. David, 2002. "Definitions of Biodiversity and Measures of Its Value," Discussion Papers 10551, Resources for the Future.
    12. Martin L. Weitzman, 1998. "The Noah's Ark Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(6), pages 1279-1298, November.
    13. Gerber, Nicolas, 2011. "Biodiversity measures based on species-level dissimilarities: A methodology for assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 2275-2281.
    14. Suyari, Hiroki, 2006. "Mathematical structures derived from the q-multinomial coefficient in Tsallis statistics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 368(1), pages 63-82.
    15. Stephen Polasky & Jeffrey D. Camm & Brian Garber-Yonts, 2001. "Selecting Biological Reserves Cost-Effectively: An Application to Terrestrial Vertebrate Conservation in Oregon," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 77(1), pages 68-78.
    16. G. Andrew Karolyi & John Tobin‐de la Puente, 2023. "Biodiversity finance: A call for research into financing nature," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 52(2), pages 231-251, June.
    17. Perry, Neil & Shankar, Sriram, 2017. "The State-contingent Approach to the Noah's Ark Problem," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 65-72.
    18. Amy Craft & R. Simpson, 2001. "The Value of Biodiversity in Pharmaceutical Research with Differentiated Products," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Naif Alotaibi & A. S. Al-Moisheer & Ibrahim Elbatal & Mansour Shrahili & Mohammed Elgarhy & Ehab M. Almetwally, 2023. "Half Logistic Inverted Nadarajah–Haghighi Distribution under Ranked Set Sampling with Applications," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1, April.
    20. Eppink, Florian V. & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2007. "Ecological theories and indicators in economic models of biodiversity loss and conservation: A critical review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 284-293, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:557:y:2020:i:c:s0378437120304404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.