IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v513y2019icp248-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring stock market resiliency with Discrete Fourier Transform for high frequency data

Author

Listed:
  • Olbrys, Joanna
  • Mursztyn, Michal

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate market resiliency as one of the stock market liquidity dimensions. A new methodology for stock resiliency measurement based on Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) for high-frequency intraday data is introduced. The known disadvantage of DFT is signal leakage. Therefore, the modified formula for resiliency proxy that decreases the signal leakage impact by filtering is utilized. Three alternative window functions are employed: (1) the Hamming window, (2) the Kaiser window, and (3) the SR785 Flat-Top window. Furthermore, there is provided statistical analysis of the results, including its significance and some additional properties. The findings of empirical experiments for real-data from the Warsaw Stock Exchange reveal that the results rather turn out to be robust to the choice of the window filter. Thus, the DFT approach might be considered an auspicious resiliency proxy with an intuitive base.

Suggested Citation

  • Olbrys, Joanna & Mursztyn, Michal, 2019. "Measuring stock market resiliency with Discrete Fourier Transform for high frequency data," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 513(C), pages 248-256.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:513:y:2019:i:c:p:248-256
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.09.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437118311592
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2018.09.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thierry Foucault & Ohad Kadan & Eugene Kandel, 2005. "Limit Order Book as a Market for Liquidity," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 1171-1217.
    2. Alessandra Iacobucci, 2005. "Spectral Analysis for Economic Time Series," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, in: Jacek Leskow & Lionello F. Punzo & Martín Puchet Anyul (ed.), New Tools of Economic Dynamics, chapter 12, pages 203-219, Springer.
    3. Nicholas Tsounis & Aspasia Vlachvei (ed.), 2017. "Advances in Applied Economic Research," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, Springer, number 978-3-319-48454-9, March.
    4. P. Weber & B. Rosenow, 2005. "Order book approach to price impact," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 357-364.
    5. Huang, Roger D. & Stoll, Hans R., 1996. "Dealer versus auction markets: A paired comparison of execution costs on NASDAQ and the NYSE," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 313-357, July.
    6. Luo, Jiawen & Chen, Langnan & Liu, Hao, 2013. "Distribution characteristics of stock market liquidity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(23), pages 6004-6014.
    7. Sergei Maslov & Mark Mills, 2001. "Price fluctuations from the order book perspective - empirical facts and a simple model," Papers cond-mat/0102518, arXiv.org.
    8. Peter Gomber & Uwe Schweickert & Erik Theissen, 2015. "Liquidity Dynamics in an Electronic Open Limit Order Book: an Event Study Approach," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 21(1), pages 52-78, January.
    9. Huang, Roger D & Stoll, Hans R, 1997. "The Components of the Bid-Ask Spread: A General Approach," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 10(4), pages 995-1034.
    10. Kyle, Albert S, 1985. "Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(6), pages 1315-1335, November.
    11. Foucault, Thierry & Pagano, Marco & Roell, Ailsa, 2013. "Market Liquidity: Theory, Evidence, and Policy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199936243, Decembrie.
    12. Joanna Olbrys & Michal Mursztyn, 2017. "Dimensions of Market Liquidity: The Case of the Polish Stock Market," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Nicholas Tsounis & Aspasia Vlachvei (ed.), Advances in Applied Economic Research, chapter 0, pages 151-166, Springer.
    13. Robert F. Engle & Joe Lange, 1997. "Measuring, Forecasting and Explaining Time Varying Liquidity in the Stock Market," NBER Working Papers 6129, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Maslov, Sergei & Mills, Mark, 2001. "Price fluctuations from the order book perspective—empirical facts and a simple model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 299(1), pages 234-246.
    15. Gençay, Ramazan & Selçuk, Faruk & Whitcher, Brandon, 2001. "Differentiating intraday seasonalities through wavelet multi-scaling," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 289(3), pages 543-556.
    16. Lo, Danny K. & Hall, Anthony D., 2015. "Resiliency of the limit order book," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 222-244.
    17. Krzysztof Jajuga & Lucjan T. Orlowski & Karsten Staehr (ed.), 2017. "Contemporary Trends and Challenges in Finance," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, Springer, number 978-3-319-54885-2, March.
    18. Joanna Olbryś & Elżbieta Majewska, 2015. "Bear Market Periods during the 2007–2009 Financial Crisis: Direct Evidence from the Visegrad Countries," Acta Oeconomica, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 65(4), pages 547-565, December.
    19. Large, Jeremy, 2007. "Measuring the resiliency of an electronic limit order book," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, February.
    20. Jun Muranaga & Tokiko Shimizu, 1999. "Market Microstructure and Market Liquidity," CGFS Papers chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Market Liquidity: Research Findings and Selected Policy Implications, volume 11, pages 1-28, Bank for International Settlements.
    21. Adrian R. Pagan & Kirill A. Sossounov, 2003. "A simple framework for analysing bull and bear markets," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 23-46.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Olbrys, Joanna & Mursztyn, Michal, 2019. "Estimation of intraday stock market resiliency: Short-Time Fourier Transform approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 535(C).
    2. Tang, Chun & Liu, Xiaoxing & Zhou, Donghai, 2022. "Financial market resilience and financial development: A global perspective," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    3. Isao Yagi & Yuji Masuda & Takanobu Mizuta, 2020. "Analysis of the Impact of High-Frequency Trading on Artificial Market Liquidity," Papers 2010.13038, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olbrys, Joanna & Mursztyn, Michal, 2019. "Estimation of intraday stock market resiliency: Short-Time Fourier Transform approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 535(C).
    2. Hai-Chuan Xu & Wei Chen & Xiong Xiong & Wei Zhang & Wei-Xing Zhou & H Eugene Stanley, 2016. "Limit-order book resiliency after effective market orders: Spread, depth and intensity," Papers 1602.00731, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2017.
    3. Joanna Olbryś & Michał Mursztyn, 2017. "Measurement of stock market liquidity supported by an algorithm inferring the initiator of a trade," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 27(4), pages 111-127.
    4. Daniel Havran & Kata Varadi, 2015. "Price Impact and the Recovery of the Limit Order Book: Why Should We Care About Informed Liquidity Providers?," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 1540, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    5. Matthias Schnaubelt & Jonas Rende & Christopher Krauss, 2019. "Testing Stylized Facts of Bitcoin Limit Order Books," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-30, February.
    6. Baron Law & Frederi Viens, 2019. "Market Making under a Weakly Consistent Limit Order Book Model," Papers 1903.07222, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2020.
    7. Griffith, Todd G. & Roseman, Brian S., 2019. "Making cents of tick sizes: The effect of the 2016 U.S. SEC tick size pilot on limit order book liquidity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 104-121.
    8. Hwang, Hae-shin & Jindapon, Paan, 2020. "Market making with convex quotes," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    9. Thomas A. P. de Boer & Cornelis Gardebroek & Joost M. E. Pennings & Andres Trujillo‐Barrera, 2022. "Intraday liquidity in soybean complex futures markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(7), pages 1189-1211, July.
    10. Martin D. Gould & Mason A. Porter & Stacy Williams & Mark McDonald & Daniel J. Fenn & Sam D. Howison, 2010. "Limit Order Books," Papers 1012.0349, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2013.
    11. Beaupain, Renaud & Durré, Alain, 2013. "Central bank reserves and interbank market liquidity in the euro area," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 259-284.
    12. G. Wuyts, 2007. "Stock Market Liquidity.Determinants and Implications," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(2), pages 279-316.
    13. Thomas Johann & Erik Theissen, 2013. "Liquidity measures," Chapters, in: Adrian R. Bell & Chris Brooks & Marcel Prokopczuk (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Empirical Finance, chapter 10, pages 238-255, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    14. Benjamin Clapham & Martin Haferkorn & Kai Zimmermann, 2020. "Does Speed Matter? The Role Of High‐Frequency Trading For Order Book Resiliency," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 43(4), pages 933-964, December.
    15. Stenfors, Alexis & Susai, Masayuki, 2019. "Liquidity withdrawal in the FX spot market: A cross-country study using high-frequency data," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 36-57.
    16. Jagjeev Dosanjh, 2017. "Exchange Initiatives and Market Efficiency: Evidence from the Australian Securities Exchange," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 1-2017.
    17. Matthieu Wyart & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Julien Kockelkoren & Marc Potters & Michele Vettorazzo, 2008. "Relation between bid-ask spread, impact and volatility in order-driven markets," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 41-57.
    18. Pelizzon, Loriana & Sagade, Satchit & Vozian, Katia, 2020. "Resiliency: Cross-venue dynamics with Hawkes processes," SAFE Working Paper Series 291, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    19. repec:uts:finphd:34 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Matthieu Wyart & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Julien Kockelkoren & Marc Potters & Michele Vettorazzo, 2006. "Relation between Bid-Ask Spread, Impact and Volatility in Double Auction Markets," Science & Finance (CFM) working paper archive 500067, Science & Finance, Capital Fund Management.
    21. Johannes Bleher & Michael Bleher & Thomas Dimpfl, 2020. "From orders to prices: A stochastic description of the limit order book to forecast intraday returns," Papers 2004.11953, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:513:y:2019:i:c:p:248-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.