IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/phsmap/v510y2018icp1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Registering the evolutionary history in individual-based models of speciation

Author

Listed:
  • Costa, Carolina L.N.
  • Marquitti, Flavia M.D.
  • Perez, S. Ivan
  • Schneider, David M.
  • Ramos, Marlon F.
  • de Aguiar, Marcus A.M.

Abstract

Understanding the emergence of biodiversity patterns in nature is a central problem in biology. Theoretical models of speciation have addressed this question in the macroecological scale, but little has been done to connect microevolutionary processes with macroevolutionary patterns. Knowledge of the evolutionary history allows the study of patterns underlying the processes being modeled, revealing their signatures and the role of speciation and extinction in shaping macroevolutionary patterns. In this paper we introduce two algorithms to record the evolutionary history of populations and species in individual-based models of speciation, from which genealogies and phylogenies can be constructed. The first algorithm relies on saving ancestor–descendant relationships, generating a matrix that contains the times to the most recent common ancestor between all pairs of individuals at every generation (the Most Recent Common Ancestor Time matrix, MRCAT). The second algorithm directly records all speciation and extinction events throughout the evolutionary process, generating a matrix with the true phylogeny of species (the Sequential Speciation and Extinction Events, SSEE). We illustrate the use of these algorithms in a spatially explicit individual-based model of speciation. We compare the trees generated via MRCAT and SSEE algorithms with trees inferred by methods that use only genetic distance between individuals of extant species, commonly used in empirical studies and applied here to simulated genetic data. Comparisons between trees are performed with metrics describing the overall topology, branch length distribution and imbalance degree. We observe that both MRCAT and distance-based trees differ from the true phylogeny, with the first being closer to the true tree than the second.

Suggested Citation

  • Costa, Carolina L.N. & Marquitti, Flavia M.D. & Perez, S. Ivan & Schneider, David M. & Ramos, Marlon F. & de Aguiar, Marcus A.M., 2018. "Registering the evolutionary history in individual-based models of speciation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 510(C), pages 1-14.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:510:y:2018:i:c:p:1-14
    DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2018.05.150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437118307118
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only. Journal offers the option of making the article available online on Science direct for a fee of $3,000
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.physa.2018.05.150?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. U. Dieckmann & M. Doebeli, 1999. "On the Origin of Species by Sympatric Speciation," Working Papers ir99013, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    2. Ulf Dieckmann & Michael Doebeli, 1999. "On the origin of species by sympatric speciation," Nature, Nature, vol. 400(6742), pages 354-357, July.
    3. Leithen K. M’Gonigle & Rupert Mazzucco & Sarah P. Otto & Ulf Dieckmann, 2012. "Sexual selection enables long-term coexistence despite ecological equivalence," Nature, Nature, vol. 484(7395), pages 506-509, April.
    4. M. A. M. de Aguiar & M. Baranger & E. M. Baptestini & L. Kaufman & Y. Bar-Yam, 2009. "Global patterns of speciation and diversity," Nature, Nature, vol. 460(7253), pages 384-387, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Åke Brännström & Jacob Johansson & Niels Von Festenberg, 2013. "The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Adaptive Dynamics," Games, MDPI, vol. 4(3), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Alexandros Rigos & Heinrich H. Nax, 2015. "Assortativity evolving from social dilemmas," Discussion Papers in Economics 15/19, Division of Economics, School of Business, University of Leicester.
    3. Chaianunporn, Thotsapol & Hovestadt, Thomas, 2012. "Concurrent evolution of random dispersal and habitat niche width in host-parasitoid systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 247(C), pages 241-250.
    4. Michael B. Doud & Animesh Gupta & Victor Li & Sarah J. Medina & Caesar A. Fuente & Justin R. Meyer, 2024. "Competition-driven eco-evolutionary feedback reshapes bacteriophage lambda’s fitness landscape and enables speciation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    5. Bagnoli, Franco & Guardiani, Carlo, 2005. "A model of sympatric speciation through assortative mating," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 347(C), pages 534-574.
    6. Bhattacharyay, A. & Drossel, B., 2005. "Modeling coevolution and sympatric speciation of flowers and pollinators," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 345(1), pages 159-172.
    7. Sakamoto, T. & Innan, H., 2020. "Establishment process of a magic trait allele subject to both divergent selection and assortative mating," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 9-18.
    8. Cook, James N. & Oono, Y., 2010. "Competitive localization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(9), pages 1849-1860.
    9. Cecilia Berardo & Iulia Martina Bulai & Ezio Venturino, 2021. "Interactions Obtained from Basic Mechanistic Principles: Prey Herds and Predators," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(20), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Davison, Raziel & Stadman, Marc & Jongejans, Eelke, 2019. "Stochastic effects contribute to population fitness differences," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 408(C), pages 1-1.
    11. E. Kisdi & S.A.H. Geritz, 1999. "Evolutionary Branching and Sympatric Speciation in Diploid Populations," Working Papers ir99048, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    12. José Camacho Mateu & Matteo Sireci & Miguel A Muñoz, 2021. "Phenotypic-dependent variability and the emergence of tolerance in bacterial populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(9), pages 1-28, September.
    13. Troost, T.A. & Kooi, B.W. & Kooijman, S.A.L.M., 2007. "Bifurcation analysis of ecological and evolutionary processes in ecosystems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 204(1), pages 253-268.
    14. Zu, Jian & Wang, Jinliang, 2013. "Adaptive evolution of attack ability promotes the evolutionary branching of predator species," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 12-23.
    15. Zvi Drezner & Taly Dawn Drezner, 2020. "Biologically Inspired Parent Selection in Genetic Algorithms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 287(1), pages 161-183, April.
    16. Débarre, Florence & Otto, Sarah P., 2016. "Evolutionary dynamics of a quantitative trait in a finite asexual population," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 75-88.
    17. Jonathan Newton, 2017. "The preferences of Homo Moralis are unstable under evolving assortativity," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(2), pages 583-589, May.
    18. Boettiger, Carl & Dushoff, Jonathan & Weitz, Joshua S., 2010. "Fluctuation domains in adaptive evolution," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 6-13.
    19. Svardal, Hannes & Rueffler, Claus & Hermisson, Joachim, 2015. "A general condition for adaptive genetic polymorphism in temporally and spatially heterogeneous environments," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 76-97.
    20. Jonathan Newton, 2018. "Evolutionary Game Theory: A Renaissance," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-67, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:phsmap:v:510:y:2018:i:c:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/physica-a-statistical-mechpplications/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.