IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v75y2018icp449-458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influences of afforestation policies on soil moisture content in China’s arid and semi-arid regions

Author

Listed:
  • Cao, Jianjun
  • Tian, Hong
  • Adamowski, Jan F.
  • Zhang, Xiaofang
  • Cao, Zijian

Abstract

In exploring the effects of afforestation policies on soil water dynamics, soil moisture content was measured in two different rainfall events (within a lengthy drought period and during a drought-free period), up to 1.0 m depth, both at non-afforested and afforested sites situated in China’s central region. The non-afforested sites included abandoned and cropped lands. These were compared to lands afforested with either poplar or apricot of different stand ages: 16- vs. 40-year for apricot, and 40-year primary planting vs. c. 30-year secondary planting for poplar. The results showed that at the 1.0 m soil depth profile, the average soil moisture content across all forested lands was consistently inferior to that of either arable or abandoned lands both in the absence of rain and after rainfall events. The arable and abandoned lands showed no difference in soil moisture content in the absence of rain (9.16% vs. 9.24%, respectively), whereas a significant difference did exist after rainfall events (18.31% vs. 16.99%). However, among all the investigated land types, primary and secondary poplar stands showed the highest soil moisture content levels both before (≈10.00%) and after rain (≈18.50%), whereas apricot stand soil moisture content levels were approximately 7.17%, and 15.86%, before and after rain, respectively. Stand age had a significant effect on soil moisture content, with a 16-year stand of apricot being 8.44%, but a 40-year stand being 5.89%. Given that in the present study, afforestation species and stand age together with rainfall events influenced soil moisture content, these factors should be considered in implementing afforestation, and in making accurate comparisons among land use types in arid and semiarid regions, where water is the key limiting resource.

Suggested Citation

  • Cao, Jianjun & Tian, Hong & Adamowski, Jan F. & Zhang, Xiaofang & Cao, Zijian, 2018. "Influences of afforestation policies on soil moisture content in China’s arid and semi-arid regions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 449-458.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:75:y:2018:i:c:p:449-458
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837718302102
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bossio, Deborah & Geheb, Kim, 2008. "Conserving land, protecting water. Introduction," IWMI Books, Reports H041589, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Trabucco, Antonio & Bossio, Deborah & van Stratten, O., 2008. "Carbon sequestration, land degradation and water," IWMI Books, Reports H041595, International Water Management Institute.
    3. Calder, Ian R., 1986. "Water use of eucalypts -- A review with special reference to South India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 11(3-4), pages 333-342, September.
    4. Bossio, Deborah & Geheb, Kim, 2008. "Conserving land, protecting water," IWMI Books, Reports H041588, International Water Management Institute.
    5. Hardaker, Ashley, 2018. "Is forestry really more profitable than upland farming? A historic and present day farm level economic comparison of upland sheep farming and forestry in the UK," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 98-120.
    6. Thomas Knoke & Jörg Bendix & Perdita Pohle & Ute Hamer & Patrick Hildebrandt & Kristin Roos & Andrés Gerique & María L. Sandoval & Lutz Breuer & Alexander Tischer & Brenner Silva & Baltazar Calvas & N, 2014. "Afforestation or intense pasturing improve the ecological and economic value of abandoned tropical farmlands," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 5(1), pages 1-12, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cao, Jianjun & Wei, Chen & Adamowski, Jan F. & Zhou, Junju & Liu, Chunfang & Zhu, Guofeng & Dong, Xiaogang & Zhang, Xiaofang & Zhao, Huijun & Feng, Qi, 2020. "Could arid and semi-arid abandoned lands prove ecologically or economically valuable if they afford greater soil organic carbon storage than afforested lands in China’s Loess Plateau?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Cao, Jianjun & Li, Guangdong & Adamowski, Jan F. & Holden, Nicholas M. & Deo, Ravinesh C. & Hu, Zeyong & Zhu, Guofeng & Xu, Xueyun & Feng, Qi, 2019. "Suitable exclosure duration for the restoration of degraded alpine grasslands on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 261-267.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Drechsel, Pay & Heffer, P. & Magen, H. & Mikkelsen, R. & Singh, H. & Wichelns, D., 2015. "Managing water and nutrients to ensure global food security, while sustaining ecosystem services," IWMI Books, Reports H046806, International Water Management Institute.
    2. Uilson Ricardo Venâncio Aires & Demetrius David Silva & Michel Castro Moreira & Carlos Antônio Alvares Soares Ribeiro & Celso Bandeira de Melo Ribeiro, 2020. "The Use of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index to Analyze the Influence of Vegetation Cover Changes on the Streamflow in the Manhuaçu River Basin, Brazil," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(6), pages 1933-1949, April.
    3. Boelee, Eline & Scherr, S. J. & Pert, P. L. & Barron, J. & Finlayson, M. & Descheemaeker, K. & Milder, J. C. & Fleiner, R. & Nguyen-Khoa, S. & Barchiesi, S. & Bunting, S. W. & Tharme, R. E. & Khaka, E, 2013. "Management of water and agroecosystems in landscapes for sustainable food security," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    4. Esther Reith & Elizabeth Gosling & Thomas Knoke & Carola Paul, 2020. "How Much Agroforestry Is Needed to Achieve Multifunctional Landscapes at the Forest Frontier?—Coupling Expert Opinion with Robust Goal Programming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-27, July.
    5. Paula Meli & Karen D Holl & José María Rey Benayas & Holly P Jones & Peter C Jones & Daniel Montoya & David Moreno Mateos, 2017. "A global review of past land use, climate, and active vs. passive restoration effects on forest recovery," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(2), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Arnott, David & Chadwick, David R. & Wynne-Jones, Sophie & Jones, David L., 2021. "Vulnerability of British farms to post-Brexit subsidy removal, and implications for intensification, extensification and land sparing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    7. Drechsel, Pay & Heffer, P. & Magen, H. & Mikkelsen, R. & Singh, H. & Wichelns, D., 2015. "Managing water and nutrients to ensure global food security, while sustaining ecosystem services," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    8. Qiming Zheng & Tim Ha & Alexander V. Prishchepov & Yiwen Zeng & He Yin & Lian Pin Koh, 2023. "The neglected role of abandoned cropland in supporting both food security and climate change mitigation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Knoke, Thomas & Gosling, Elizabeth & Paul, Carola, 2020. "Use and misuse of the net present value in environmental studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. Eros Borsato & Alejandro Galindo & Paolo Tarolli & Luigi Sartori & Francesco Marinello, 2018. "Evaluation of the Grey Water Footprint Comparing the Indirect Effects of Different Agricultural Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    11. Boelee, Eline, 2013. "Managing water and agroecosystems for food security," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    12. Shurong Yang & Danrui Sheng & Jan Adamowski & Yifan Gong & Jian Zhang & Jianjun Cao, 2018. "Effect of Land Use Change on Soil Carbon Storage over the Last 40 Years in the Shi Yang River Basin, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, January.
    13. Hardaker, Ashley & Pagella, Tim & Rayment, Mark, 2020. "Integrated assessment, valuation and mapping of ecosystem services and dis-services from upland land use in Wales," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    14. Luz Maria Castro & Baltazar Calvas & Thomas Knoke, 2015. "Ecuadorian Banana Farms Should Consider Organic Banana with Low Price Risks in Their Land-Use Portfolios," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, March.
    15. Lindsay Stringer, 2009. "Reviewing the links between desertification and food insecurity: from parallel challenges to synergistic solutions," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 1(2), pages 113-126.
    16. Ota, Liz & Herbohn, John & Gregorio, Nestor & Harrison, Steve, 2020. "Reforestation and smallholder livelihoods in the humid tropics," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Pert, P. L. & Boelee, Eline & Jarvis, D. I. & Coates, D. & Bindraban, P. & Barron, J. & Tharme, R. E. & Herrero, M., 2013. "Challenges to agroecosystem management," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    18. Tarin Toledo-Aceves & Manuel R. Guariguata & Sven Günter & Luciana Porter-Bolland & Leticia Merino, 2021. "Overcoming Key Barriers for Secondary Cloud Forest Management in Mexico," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Rössert, Sebastian & Gosling, Elizabeth & Gandorfer, Markus & Knoke, Thomas, 2022. "Woodchips or potato chips? How enhancing soil carbon and reducing chemical inputs influence the allocation of cropland," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    20. Thomas Knoke & Nick Hanley & Rosa Maria Roman-Cuesta & Ben Groom & Frank Venmans & Carola Paul, 2023. "Trends in tropical forest loss and the social value of emission reductions," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1373-1384, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:75:y:2018:i:c:p:449-458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.