IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v103y2021ics026483772100020x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple agents and self-organisation in complex cities: The crucial role of several property

Author

Listed:
  • Cozzolino, Stefano
  • Moroni, Stefano

Abstract

The spatial dimension of property is underexamined in the planning literature. Above all, and surprisingly, this dimension is underestimated in the debate on complex self-organising cities. However, if we consider the importance of action in and for urban self-organisation, property cannot but be an aspect indispensable for understanding the propensity of cities to grow (more or less) spontaneously over time. This article first explores property patterns and their importance for self-organising cities. It then develops some ideas on how to increase the capacity of cities to rely on self-organisation. It shows that there is an urgent need to include the importance of property in the discourse, both from a descriptive/exploratory perspective and from a strategic/normative one.

Suggested Citation

  • Cozzolino, Stefano & Moroni, Stefano, 2021. "Multiple agents and self-organisation in complex cities: The crucial role of several property," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:103:y:2021:i:c:s026483772100020x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026483772100020X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105297?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gallagher, Rachel & Liu, Yan & Sigler, Thomas, 2019. "Parcel amalgamation as a mechanism for achieving urban consolidation through densification: The fixity of property boundaries over time," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    2. David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), 2014. "Cities and Private Planning," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15788.
    3. Hughes, Cathy & Sayce, Sarah & Shepherd, Edward & Wyatt, Pete, 2020. "Implementing a land value tax: Considerations on moving from theory to practice," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    4. Ho, Peter, 2018. "Institutional function versus form: The evolutionary credibility of land, housing and natural resources," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 642-650.
    5. Luca A Minola & Fred E Foldvary & David E Andersson, 2020. "Fiscal principles for self-organizing cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(2), pages 235-250, February.
    6. Moroni, Stefano, 2018. "Property as a human right and property as a special title. Rediscussing private ownership of land," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 273-280.
    7. Paul Cheshire & Stephen Sheppard, 1989. "British Planning Policy and Access to Housing: Some Empirical Estimates," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 26(5), pages 469-485, October.
    8. Murray N. Rothbard, 1997. "The Logic of Action Two," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1223.
    9. Francesco Chiodelli & Valeria Baglione, 2014. "Living together privately: for a cautious reading of cohousing," Urban Research & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 20-34, January.
    10. Stefano Moroni & Ward Rauws & Stefano Cozzolino, 2020. "Forms of self-organization: Urban complexity and planning implications," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(2), pages 220-234, February.
    11. Choi, Chang Gyu & Lee, Sugie & Kim, Heungsoon & Seong, Eun Yeong, 2019. "Critical junctures and path dependence in urban planning and housing policy: A review of greenbelts and New Towns in Korea’s Seoul metropolitan area," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 195-204.
    12. Murray N. Rothbard, 1997. "The Logic of Action One," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 968.
    13. Stefano Cozzolino, 2020. "The (anti) adaptive neighbourhoods. Embracing complexity and distribution of design control in the ordinary built environment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(2), pages 203-219, February.
    14. Chris Webster & Lawrence W.-C. Lai, 2003. "Property Rights, Planning and Markets," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2625.
    15. Nachmany, Harel & Hananel, Ravit, 2019. "A tale of two neighborhoods: Toward a new typology of land rights," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 233-245.
    16. Arka Pandit & Zhongming Lu & John C. Crittenden, 2015. "Managing the Complexity of Urban Systems," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 19(2), pages 201-204, April.
    17. Timothy Bates & Alicia Robb, 2013. "Greater Access to Capital Is Needed to Unleash the Local Economic Development Potential of Minority-Owned Businesses," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 27(3), pages 250-259, August.
    18. Lynne Kiesling, 2018. "Toward a Market Epistemology of the Platform Economy," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: Austrian Economics: The Next Generation, volume 23, pages 45-70, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    19. Maine, Henry Sumner, 1875. "Lectures on the Early History of Institutions," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number maine1875.
    20. Çağdaş, Volkan & Paasch, Jesper M. & Paulsson, Jenny & Ploeger, Hendrik & Kara, Abdullah, 2020. "Co-ownership shares in condominium – A comparative analysis for selected civil law jurisdictions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    21. Andre Sorensen, 2015. "Taking path dependence seriously: an historical institutionalist research agenda in planning history," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 17-38, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mahsa Mesgar & Diego Ramirez-Lovering, 2021. "Informal Land Rights and Infrastructure Retrofit: A Typology of Land Rights in Informal Settlements," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Slaev, Aleksandar D., 2022. "Matching the degree of privateness/collectiveness to the scale of resource use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Ian Carter & Stefano Moroni, 2022. "Adaptive and anti-adaptive neighbourhoods: Investigating the relationship between individual choice and systemic adaptability," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 722-736, February.
    4. Dimitrios Kalfas & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis & Efstratios Loizou & Katerina Melfou, 2022. "Willingness to Pay for Urban and Suburban Green," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Joseph Morgan & Sina Shahab, 2023. "Impact of Land Value Tax on the Equity of Planning Outcomes," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-13, May.
    6. Slaev, Aleksandar D. & Alexander, Ernest R. & Zdravkov, Zdravko & Ivanov, Valeri & Georgieva, Snezhina, 2022. "Market tools for the provision of urban green spaces in post-socialist Sofia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    7. Glaeser, Edward & Kourtit, Karima & Nijkamp, Peter, 2021. "New urban challenges: Shared spaces in smart places – Overview and positioning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    8. Beatrice Maria Bellè, 2023. "Background Conditions for Revitalisation Processes in the Case of Unused Public Buildings in Italy: An Ostromian Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. O’Brien, Philip & Lord, Alex & Dembski, Sebastian, 2020. "How do planners manage risk in alternative land development models? An institutional analysis of land development in the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Ward Rauws & Stefano Cozzolino & Stefano Moroni, 2020. "Framework rules for self-organizing cities: Introduction," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(2), pages 195-202, February.
    3. Tsahor, Michal & Katoshevski-Cavari, Rachel & Alfasi, Nurit, 2023. "Assessing urban adaptability: The key is in the land use plan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    4. Stefano Moroni, 2014. "Towards a general theory of contractual communities: neither necessarily gated, nor a form of privatization," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 3, pages 38-65, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Loris Servillo & Rob Atkinson & Abdelillah Hamdouch & Fennie M. Van Straalen & Patrick Witte & Edwin Buitelaar, 2017. "Self-Organisation in Oosterwold, Almere: Challenges with Public Goods and Externalities," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(4), pages 503-511, September.
    6. Jordan Reel & Walter E. Block, 2013. "Educational Vouchers: Freedom to Choose?," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 7(4), December.
    7. Slaev, Aleksandar D., 2022. "Matching the degree of privateness/collectiveness to the scale of resource use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    8. André Sorensen & Anna-Katharina Brenner, 2021. "Cities, Urban Property Systems, and Sustainability Transitions: Contested Processes of Institutional Change and the Regulation of Urban Property Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, July.
    9. D. Štastný, 2001. "Je Methodenstreit minulostí?," E-LOGOS, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2001(1).
    10. Jiří Štekláč, 2015. "Politicko-ekonomické varianty vyhlazování hospodářského cyklu v soudobých úvěrových ekonomikách [Political-Economic Options for Smoothing of Business Cycles within the Current Credit-Economy]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2015(1), pages 3-31.
    11. Ward Rauws & Gert De Roo, 2016. "Adaptive planning: Generating conditions for urban adaptability. Lessons from Dutch organic development strategies," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(6), pages 1052-1074, November.
    12. Stefano Cozzolino, 2020. "The (anti) adaptive neighbourhoods. Embracing complexity and distribution of design control in the ordinary built environment," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(2), pages 203-219, February.
    13. Ioana Negru, 2013. "Revisiting the Concept of Schools of Thought in Economics: The Example of the Austrian School," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 983-1008, October.
    14. Alan W. Evans, 1996. "The Impact of Land Use Planning and Tax Subsidies on the Supply and Price of Housing in Britain: A Comment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(3), pages 581-585, April.
    15. Claude Lacour & Sylvette Puissant, 2007. "Re-Urbanity: Urbanising the Rural and Ruralising the Urban," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 39(3), pages 728-747, March.
    16. Calcagno, Peter T. & Hall, Joshua C. & Lawson, Robert A., 2010. "Objectivism versus subjectivism: A market test," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 445-448, November.
    17. Moroni, Stefano & Antoniucci, Valentina & Bisello, Adriano, 2016. "Energy sprawl, land taking and distributed generation: towards a multi-layered density," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 266-273.
    18. T. William Lester & Matthew D. Wilson, 2023. "The Racial and Spatial Impacts of the Paycheck Protection Program," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 37(3), pages 243-258, August.
    19. Yin, Xu & Wang, Jing & Li, Yurui & Feng, Zhiming & Wang, Qianyi, 2021. "Are small towns really inefficient? A data envelopment analysis of sampled towns in Jiangsu province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    20. Ernest R. Alexander, 2015. "70 Years? Planning Theory: A Post-postmodernist Perspective," SCIENZE REGIONALI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 5-18.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:103:y:2021:i:c:s026483772100020x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.