IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/tvecsg/v108y2017i4p503-511.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-Organisation in Oosterwold, Almere: Challenges with Public Goods and Externalities

Author

Listed:
  • Loris Servillo
  • Rob Atkinson
  • Abdelillah Hamdouch
  • Fennie M. Van Straalen
  • Patrick Witte
  • Edwin Buitelaar

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Loris Servillo & Rob Atkinson & Abdelillah Hamdouch & Fennie M. Van Straalen & Patrick Witte & Edwin Buitelaar, 2017. "Self-Organisation in Oosterwold, Almere: Challenges with Public Goods and Externalities," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(4), pages 503-511, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:108:y:2017:i:4:p:503-511
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/tesg.12267
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Webster & Lawrence W.-C. Lai, 2003. "Property Rights, Planning and Markets," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2625.
    2. Justus Uitermark, 2015. "Longing for Wikitopia: The study and politics of self-organisation," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(13), pages 2301-2312, October.
    3. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    4. David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), 2014. "Cities and Private Planning," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15788.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. J Partanen, 2020. "Guiding urban self-organization: Combining rule-based and case-based planning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(2), pages 304-320, February.
    2. Peter Pelzer & Roger Hildingsson & Alice Herrström & Johannes Stripple, 2021. "Planning for 1000 Years: The Råängen Experiment," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 249-262.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jieming Zhu, 2005. "A Transitional Institution for the Emerging Land Market in Urban China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(8), pages 1369-1390, July.
    2. Lawrence Wai-Chung Lai, 2014. "Planning by contract: two dialogues," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 7, pages 135-152, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Alison Brown & Colman Msoka & Ibrahima Dankoco, 2015. "A refugee in my own country: Evictions or property rights in the urban informal economy?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(12), pages 2234-2249, September.
    4. Gabriel Hoh Teck Ling & Pau Chung Leng & Chin Siong Ho, 2019. "Effects of Diverse Property Rights on Rural Neighbourhood Public Open Space (POS) Governance: Evidence from Sabah, Malaysia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-33, June.
    5. Cozzolino, Stefano & Moroni, Stefano, 2021. "Multiple agents and self-organisation in complex cities: The crucial role of several property," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    6. David Emanuel Andersson, 2014. "Cities and planning: the role of system constraints," Chapters, in: David Emanuel Andersson & Stefano Moroni (ed.), Cities and Private Planning, chapter 2, pages 19-37, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Edwin Buitelaar, 2004. "A Transaction-cost Analysis of the Land Development Process," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(13), pages 2539-2553, December.
    8. J. Peter Clinch & Eoin O'Neill, 2010. "Assessing the Relative Merits of Development Charges and Transferable Development Rights in an Uncertain World," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(4), pages 891-911, April.
    9. Deng, Feng, 2008. "What Is “Open”? An Economic Analysis of Open Institutions," MPRA Paper 8888, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. O’Brien, Philip & Lord, Alex & Dembski, Sebastian, 2020. "How do planners manage risk in alternative land development models? An institutional analysis of land development in the Netherlands," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Webster, Chris & Wu, Fulong & Zhang, Fangzhu & Sarkar, Chinmoy, 2016. "Informality, property rights, and poverty in China’s “favelas”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 461-476.
    12. Shahab, Sina & Clinch, J. Peter & O'Neill, Eoin, 2019. "An Analysis of the Factors Influencing Transaction Costs in Transferable Development Rights Programmes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 409-419.
    13. Lai, Lawrence W.C. & Davies, Stephen N.G. & Chan, Edwin H.W. & Chua, Mark Hansley & Lin, C.L., 2020. "The production and consumption of land use planning: A neo-institutional economic perspective & three Taiwan case studies of planning layering," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    14. Erwin van der Krabben, 2009. "A Property Rights Approach to Externality Problems: Planning Based on Compensation Rules," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(13), pages 2869-2890, December.
    15. Chen Shi & Bo-sin Tang, 2020. "Institutional change and diversity in the transfer of land development rights in China: The case of Chengdu," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(3), pages 473-489, February.
    16. Lawrence Lai, 2011. "Commentary: Journey through Six Property Rights Stories along the Pacific Rim," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(3), pages 589-594, February.
    17. Barrie Needham & Arno Segeren & Edwin Buitelaar, 2011. "Institutions in Theories of Land Markets: Illustrated by the Dutch Market for Agricultural Land," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(1), pages 161-176, January.
    18. Ling-Hin Li & Xin Li, 2007. "Land Readjustment: An Innovative Urban Experiment in China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(1), pages 81-98, January.
    19. Ward Rauws & Gert De Roo, 2016. "Adaptive planning: Generating conditions for urban adaptability. Lessons from Dutch organic development strategies," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(6), pages 1052-1074, November.
    20. Slaev, Aleksandar D., 2022. "Matching the degree of privateness/collectiveness to the scale of resource use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:108:y:2017:i:4:p:503-511. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0040-747X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.