IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v75y2022ics0957178722000194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A conceptual construct on value for infrastructure asset management

Author

Listed:
  • Almeida, N.
  • Trindade, M.
  • Komljenovic, D.
  • Finger, M.

Abstract

Understanding the meaning of value to asset-intensive organizations and their stakeholders has been a long-standing goal of researchers and managers of the asset management community. These issues have become particularly prominent with the publication of the ISO 5500x series of standards on asset management. These standards are intended to guide asset-intensive organizations of different types towards realising value from their asset base. However, value can be defined and shaped in various ways, and a high-level conceptual construct to frame these differences is needed. Because such a construct has not yet been established, organizations have no standard guidance to systematically achieve and demonstrate that value is derived from their assets. The paper also discusses the impact of cognitive and motivational biases as well as the complexity of operational and business context while determining the meaning of value. This article presents an overview of theories on value and proposes an original high-level conceptual construct to be used by decision-makers in infrastructure organizations. This holistic proposal provides a structured understanding of the value concept and intends to assist infrastructure asset managers in establishing or developing their decision making processes at all levels of the organization. It enables decision-makers to factor in the benefits and impacts of competing decision options in organizational objectives and stakeholders’ needs and expectations and promotes the grasping of opportunities and an enhanced balancing of costs, risks and performance throughout the life cycle of infrastructures.

Suggested Citation

  • Almeida, N. & Trindade, M. & Komljenovic, D. & Finger, M., 2022. "A conceptual construct on value for infrastructure asset management," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:75:y:2022:i:c:s0957178722000194
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2022.101354
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178722000194
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2022.101354?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Park, Sanghoon & Park, Sang I. & Lee, Sang-Ho, 2016. "Strategy on sustainable infrastructure asset management: Focus on Korea׳s future policy directivity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 710-722.
    2. Wolfgang Ulaga & Samir Chacour, 2001. "Measuring Customer-Perceived Value in Business Markets: A Prerequisite for Marketing Strategy Development and Implementation," Post-Print hal-00485109, HAL.
    3. Harchaoui, Tarek Tarkhani, Faouzi Warren, Paul, 2003. "Public Infrastructure in Canada: Where Do We Stand?," Insights on the Canadian Economy 2003005e, Statistics Canada, Economic Analysis Division.
    4. Sang-Ho Lee & Sanghoon Park & Jong Myung Kim, 2015. "Suggestion for a Framework for a Sustainable Infrastructure Asset Management Manual in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-26, November.
    5. Sheth, Jagdish N. & Newman, Bruce I. & Gross, Barbara L., 1991. "Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 159-170, March.
    6. Gilberto Montibeller & Detlof von Winterfeldt, 2015. "Cognitive and Motivational Biases in Decision and Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(7), pages 1230-1251, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Komppula, Raija & Gartner, William C., 2013. "Hunting as a travel experience: An auto-ethnographic study of hunting tourism in Finland and the USA," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 168-180.
    2. Zubair Hassan, 2017. "Impact of Social, Epistemic and Conditional Values on Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty in Automobile Industry: A Structural Equation Modelling," Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(5), pages 29-44.
    3. Rintamäki, Timo & Saarijärvi, Hannu, 2021. "An integrative framework for managing customer value propositions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 754-764.
    4. Saarijärvi, Hannu & Mitronen, Lasse & Yrjölä, Mika, 2014. "From selling to supporting – Leveraging mobile services in the context of food retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 26-36.
    5. Shuang Liu & Kirsten Maclean & Cathy Robinson, 2019. "A cost-effective framework to prioritise stakeholder participation options," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 7(3), pages 221-241, November.
    6. Anxin Xu & Chenwen Wei & Manhua Zheng & Lili Sun & Decong Tang, 2022. "Influence of Perceived Value on Repurchase Intention of Green Agricultural Products: From the Perspective of Multi-Group Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Mäntymäki, Matti & Salo, Jari, 2013. "Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 282-290.
    8. Yuhan Ge & Qing Yuan & Yaxi Wang & Keunsoo Park, 2021. "The Structural Relationship among Perceived Service Quality, Perceived Value, and Customer Satisfaction-Focused on Starbucks Reserve Coffee Shops in Shanghai, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-19, August.
    9. Ostovan, Nima & Khalili Nasr, Arash, 2022. "The manifestation of luxury value dimensions in brand engagement in self-concept," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    10. Gonçalves, Helena Martins & Lourenço, Tiago Ferreira & Silva, Graça Miranda, 2016. "Green buying behavior and the theory of consumption values: A fuzzy-set approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 1484-1491.
    11. Moslehpour, Massoud & Lin, Yi Hsin & Nguyen, Thi Le Huyen, 2017. "Top purchase intention priorities of Vietnamese LCC passengers: Expectations and satisfaction," MPRA Paper 81635, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Shan, Wei & Qiao, Tong & Zhang, Mingli, 2020. "Getting more resources for better performance: The effect of user-owned resources on the value of user-generated content," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    13. Adams, Leen & Faseur, Tineke & Geuens, Maggie, 2010. "The Influence of the Self-Regulatory Focus on the Effectiveness of Stop-Smoking Campaigns for Young Smokers," Working Papers 2010/38, Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management.
    14. Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep & Bodhi, Rahul & Singh, Tripti & Almotairi, Mohammad, 2020. "Why do people use and recommend m-wallets?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    15. Prarawan Senachai & Puthipong Julagasigorn, 2024. "Retail mix instruments influencing customer perceived value and customer engagement: a conceptual framework and research agenda," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Roux, Elyette & Tafani, Eric & Vigneron, Franck, 2017. "Values associated with luxury brand consumption and the role of gender," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 102-113.
    17. Davis, Lizhu & Hodges, Nancy, 2012. "Consumer shopping value: An investigation of shopping trip value, in-store shopping value and retail format," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 229-239.
    18. Hye Jung Jung & Yun Jung Choi & Kyung Wha Oh, 2020. "Influencing Factors of Chinese Consumers’ Purchase Intention to Sustainable Apparel Products: Exploring Consumer “Attitude–Behavioral Intention” Gap," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, February.
    19. Suyang Zhou & Jinyi Chen & Zhi Wu & Yue Qiu, 2021. "Electrification of Online Ride-Hailing Vehicles in China: Intention Modelling and Market Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, November.
    20. Jin Tian & Yundou Wang & Shutian Gao, 2022. "Analysis of Mining-Related Injuries in Chinese Coal Mines and Related Risk Factors: A Statistical Research Study Based on a Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:75:y:2022:i:c:s0957178722000194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.