IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/juipol/v52y2018icp22-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic and financial aspects of the sanitation challenge: A practitioner approach

Author

Listed:
  • Perard, Edouard

Abstract

This paper examines some economic and financial aspects of the sanitation challenge. It first reviews studies on the economic benefits of sanitation and compares it with an analysis of the average economic rate of returns of financed sanitation projects. It then discusses why sanitation projects are usually not financially viable and the importance of financial sustainability. The paper concludes that the real financial challenge of universal access to basic sanitation resides more in the lack of financial sustainability at the sector level than in the total investment required to reach the target.

Suggested Citation

  • Perard, Edouard, 2018. "Economic and financial aspects of the sanitation challenge: A practitioner approach," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 22-26.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:52:y:2018:i:c:p:22-26
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2018.03.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178718301073
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jup.2018.03.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cairncross, Sandy, 2018. "The public health benefits of urban sanitation in low and middle income countries," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 82-88.
    2. Undp, 2006. "HDR 2006 - Beyond scarcity: Power, poverty and the global water crisis," Human Development Report (1990 to present), Human Development Report Office (HDRO), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), number hdr2006, September.
    3. Whittington, Dale & Hanemann, W. Michael, 2006. "The Economic Costs and Benefits of Investments in Municipal Water and Sanitation Infrastructure: A Global Perspective," CUDARE Working Papers 7159, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    4. Whittington, Dale & Hanemann, W. Michael, 2006. "The economic costs and benefits of investments in municipal water and sanitation infrastructure: a global perspective," CUDARE Working Paper Series 1027, University of California at Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Policy.
    5. World Bank, 2010. "Cost-Benefit Analysis in World Bank Projects," World Bank Publications - Reports 10481, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Quinn, Martin & Feeney, Orla, 2022. "Domestic Waste Management in Ireland - the Journey Towards Financialization," QBS Working Paper Series 271266, Queen's University Belfast, Queen's Business School.
    2. Margarida Fidélis Santos & Carolina Pires Castro & Rita Ventura Matos & Liliana Alves & José Saldanha Matos, 2023. "Dry Sanitation Technologies: Developing a Simplified Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Kherbache, Nabil & Oukaci, Kamal, 2020. "Assessment of capital expenditure in achieving sanitation-related MDG targets and the uncertainties of the SDG targets in Algeria," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruno Lanz & Allan Provins, 2014. "The demand for tap water quality: Survey evidence on water hardness and aesthetic quality," CIES Research Paper series 23-2014, Centre for International Environmental Studies, The Graduate Institute.
    2. Céline Nauges & Dale Whittington, 2010. "Estimation of Water Demand in Developing Countries: An Overview," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 25(2), pages 263-294, August.
    3. Denizer, Cevdet & Kaufmann, Daniel & Kraay, Aart, 2013. "Good countries or good projects? Macro and micro correlates of World Bank project performance," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 288-302.
    4. Martin Ravallion, 2016. "The World Bank: Why It Is Still Needed and Why It Still Disappoints," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(1), pages 77-94, Winter.
    5. Frits Bos & Thomas van der Pol & Gerbert Romijn, 2018. "Should CBA’s include a correction for the marginal excess burden of taxation?," CPB Discussion Paper 370.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    6. Kilby, Christopher, 2015. "Assessing the impact of World Bank preparation on project outcomes," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 111-123.
    7. Abdikadir Ahmed Omar & Md. Sahadat Hossain & Mst. Mahmuda Parvin, 2018. "Study On Knowledge, Attitude And Practices Towards The Solid Waste Management In Karan District, Mogadishu Somalia," Environmental Contaminants Reviews (ECR), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 22-26, February.
    8. Presbitero, Andrea F., 2016. "Too much and too fast? Public investment scaling-up and absorptive capacity," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 17-31.
    9. Shen, Wenyi & Yang, Shu-Chun S. & Zanna, Luis-Felipe, 2018. "Government spending effects in low-income countries," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 201-219.
    10. Christopher Kilby, 2012. "Assessing the contribution of donor agencies to aid effectiveness: The impact of World Bank preparation on project outcomes," Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics Working Paper Series 20, Villanova School of Business Department of Economics and Statistics.
    11. Ó. Flores & A. Jiménez & A. Pérez-Foguet, 2013. "Monitoring access to water in rural areas based on the human right to water framework: a local level case study in Nicaragua," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 605-621, December.
    12. Flyvbjerg, Bent & Bester, Dirk W., 2021. "The Cost-Benefit Fallacy: Why Cost-Benefit Analysis Is Broken and How to Fix It," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 395-419, October.
    13. Hans C. Komakech & Francis Moyo & Oscar Veses Roda & Revocatus L. Machunda & Kyla M. Smith & Om P. Gautam & Sandy Cairncross, 2019. "What Proportion Counts? Disaggregating Access to Safely Managed Sanitation in an Emerging Town in Tanzania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Kotchen, Matthew J. & Levinson, Arik, 2023. "When Can Benefit–Cost Analyses Ignore Secondary Markets?," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 114-140, March.
    15. Liu, Dehai & Ji, Xiaoxian & Tang, Jiafu & Li, Hongyi, 2020. "A fuzzy cooperative game theoretic approach for multinational water resource spatiotemporal allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 1025-1037.
    16. Daniela Molinari & Susanna Dazzi & Edoardo Gattai & Guido Minucci & Giulia Pesaro & Alessio Radice & Renato Vacondio, 2021. "Cost–benefit analysis of flood mitigation measures: a case study employing high-performance hydraulic and damage modelling," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(3), pages 3061-3084, September.
    17. Tan, Judy Y. & Huedo-Medina, Tania B. & Warren, Michelle R. & Carey, Michael P. & Johnson, Blair T., 2012. "A meta-analysis of the efficacy of HIV/AIDS prevention interventions in Asia, 1995–2009," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(4), pages 676-687.
    18. Jan Anne Annema & Koen Frenken & Carl Koopmans & Maarten Kroesen, 2017. "Relating cost-benefit analysis results with transport project decisions in the Netherlands," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 109-127, March.
    19. Rene Urueña, 2012. "The rise of the constitutional regulatory state in Colombia: The case of water governance," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), pages 282-299, September.
    20. Barbaros Yet & Christine Lamanna & Keith D Shepherd & Todd S Rosenstock, 2020. "Evidence-based investment selection: Prioritizing agricultural development investments under climatic and socio-political risk using Bayesian networks," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Sanitation; Universal access; Finance; Willingness-to-pay; Innovation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • H4 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:juipol:v:52:y:2018:i:c:p:22-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/utilities-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.