IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v79y2022ics0301420722004160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Benefit Agreements in the Nordic mining context: Local opportunities for collaboration in Sodankylä, Finland

Author

Listed:
  • Kotilainen, Juha M.
  • Peltonen, Lasse
  • Reinikainen, Kalle

Abstract

A changing operational environment and the growing opposition to mining in the Nordics, and more broadly in Europe, encourages the testing of new approaches to mineral resource governance. A Community Benefit Agreement (CBA) is an instrument based on local negotiations, which has been mostly utilized in indigenous contexts, but may hold promise in other societal contexts. However, a new context means different needs and concerns, requiring adjustments to existing models. In this article, we empirically analyze what factors drive local stakeholders toward collaboration over the impacts and benefits of mining and how a CBA could be realized in Sodankylä, Finland. The data consists of interviews and observations collected from a four-year period of action research. The findings validate the relevance of CBAs or similar arrangements in the Finnish mining context. Our study suggests that CBAs excel at addressing the challenges and opportunities that arise from the unique local social and environmental characteristics, which are difficult to address with non-local instruments. Our case shows that the municipality represents only part of the community's interests, which is impacted by mining in varying ways. The roles of local community groups and the municipality in a CBA are key considerations for implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Kotilainen, Juha M. & Peltonen, Lasse & Reinikainen, Kalle, 2022. "Community Benefit Agreements in the Nordic mining context: Local opportunities for collaboration in Sodankylä, Finland," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:79:y:2022:i:c:s0301420722004160
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420722004160
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102973?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cascadden, Maggie & Gunton, Thomas & Rutherford, Murray, 2021. "Best practices for Impact Benefit Agreements," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    2. Gunton, Cameron & Markey, Sean, 2021. "The role of community benefit agreements in natural resource governance and community development: Issues and prospects," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    3. Richard Cowell & Gill Bristow & Max Munday, 2011. "Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind energy development," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 539-557.
    4. Zachrisson, Anna & Beland Lindahl, Karin, 2019. "Political opportunity and mobilization: The evolution of a Swedish mining-sceptical movement," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Suopajärvi, Leena & Kantola, Anna, 2020. "The social impact management plan as a tool for local planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Gunton, Thomas & Werker, Eric & Markey, Sean, 2021. "Community benefit agreements and natural resource development: Achieving better outcomes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    7. Eerola, Toni, 2022. "Corporate conduct, commodity and place: Ongoing mining and mineral exploration disputes in Finland and their implications for the social license to operate," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    8. O'Faircheallaigh, Ciaran, 2021. "Explaining outcomes from negotiated agreements in Australia and Canada," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    9. World Bank, 2012. "Mining Community Development Agreements : Source Book," World Bank Publications - Reports 12641, The World Bank Group.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Taru Peltola & Sanna-Riikka Saarela & Juha M & Tapio Litmanen & Jani Lukkarinen & Ismo Pölönen & Outi Ratamäki & Heli Saarikoski & Miikka Salo & Suvi Vikström, 2023. "Researcher roles in collaborative governance interventions," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 50(5), pages 871-880.
    2. Toni Eerola, 2022. "Territories of Contention: The Importance of Project Location in Mining-Related Disputes in Finland from the Geosystem Services Perspective," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blesia, Jhon Urasti & Dixon, Keith & Lord, Beverley Rae, 2023. "Indigenous experiences and perspectives on a mining corporation's community relations and development activities," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    2. Gunton, Thomas & Werker, Eric & Markey, Sean, 2021. "Community benefit agreements and natural resource development: Achieving better outcomes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    3. Beland Lindahl, Karin & Suopajärvi, Leena & Tulilehto, Mari & Poelzer, Gregory & Eerola, Toni, 2023. "Factors affecting local attitudes to mineral exploration: What's within the company's control?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    4. Leena Suopajärvi & Karin Beland Lindahl & Toni Eerola & Gregory Poelzer, 2023. "Social aspects of business risk in the mineral industry—political, reputational, and local acceptability risks facing mineral exploration and mining," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 36(2), pages 321-331, June.
    5. Sinziana Dorobantu & Kate Odziemkowska, 2017. "Valuing Stakeholder Governance: Property Rights, Community Mobilization, and Firm Value," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(13), pages 2682-2703, December.
    6. Hogan, Jessica L. & Warren, Charles R. & Simpson, Michael & McCauley, Darren, 2022. "What makes local energy projects acceptable? Probing the connection between ownership structures and community acceptance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    7. Songsore, Emmanuel & Buzzelli, Michael, 2014. "Social responses to wind energy development in Ontario: The influence of health risk perceptions and associated concerns," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 285-296.
    8. Emmanuel Songsore & Michael Buzzelli, 2016. "Ontario’s Experience of Wind Energy Development as Seen through the Lens of Human Health and Environmental Justice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Borch, Kristian & Munk, Anders K. & Dahlgaard, Vibeke, 2020. "Mapping wind-power controversies on social media: Facebook as a powerful mobilizer of local resistance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    10. Mouter, Niek & de Geest, Auke & Doorn, Neelke, 2018. "A values-based approach to energy controversies: Value-sensitive design applied to the Groningen gas controversy in the Netherlands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 639-648.
    11. Mijailoff, Julián Daniel & Giessen, Lukas & Burns, Sarah Lilian, 2023. "Local to global escalation of land use conflicts: Long-term dynamics on social movements protests against pulp mills and plantation forests in Argentina and Uruguay," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    12. García, Jorge H. & Cherry, Todd L. & Kallbekken, Steffen & Torvanger, Asbjørn, 2016. "Willingness to accept local wind energy development: Does the compensation mechanism matter?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 165-173.
    13. David Rudolph & Claire Haggett & Mhairi Aitken, 2018. "Community benefits from offshore renewables: The relationship between different understandings of impact, community, and benefit," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 36(1), pages 92-117, February.
    14. Pepermans, Yves & Loots, Ilse, 2013. "Wind farm struggles in Flanders fields: A sociological perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 321-328.
    15. Bui, Tat-Dat & Tseng, Jiun-Wei & Lim, Ming K. & Tseng, Ming-Lang, 2023. "Natural resource management model under governance conflicts in Vietnam: A data-driven analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    16. Weber, Gabriel & Cabras, Ignazio & Calaf-Forn, Maria & Puig-Ventosa, Ignasi & D'Alisa, Giacomo, 2019. "Promoting Waste Degrowth and Environmental Justice at a Local Level: The Case of Unit-Pricing Schemes in Spain," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 306-317.
    17. Milchram, Christine & Hillerbrand, Rafaela & van de Kaa, Geerten & Doorn, Neelke & Künneke, Rolf, 2018. "Energy Justice and Smart Grid Systems: Evidence from the Netherlands and the United Kingdom," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 1244-1259.
    18. Yıldız, Taşkın Deniz & Kural, Orhan, 2020. "The effects of the mining operation activities permit process on the mining sector in Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    19. Yenneti, Komali & Day, Rosie, 2015. "Procedural (in)justice in the implementation of solar energy: The case of Charanaka solar park, Gujarat, India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 664-673.
    20. Woźniak, Justyna & Jurczyk, Weronika, 2020. "Social and environmental activities in the Polish mining region in the context of CSR," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:79:y:2022:i:c:s0301420722004160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.