What are the implications of human rights for minerals taxation?
AbstractThis article examines the relationship between a state's taxation of mineral revenues and the human rights obligation to use 'maximum available resources' to further citizens' welfare. These both have implications for understanding the other but there has been little attention to their interaction. Contemporary (economic and policy) approaches to mineral taxation revolve around economic rent and providing a 'neutral' economic environment that does not influence investment decisions. There is no reference to human rights obligations--these are just part of the state's general responsibilities for which it can legitimately raise taxes. Taxation analysis largely ignores whether the state wants money to ensure there is adequate food for the population, or instead to stage the Miss Universe pageant. Human rights has relevance for the state's management of resources. The requirement for states to apply 'maximum available resources' to fulfil human rights suggests that mineral extraction (and taxation) should occur as fast as possible to be applied for the human rights of the current population A more considered analysis weighs against such a literal interpretation. Nevertheless, the requirement of using 'maximum available resources' to fulfil human rights has important implications for mineral taxation.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Elsevier in its journal Resources Policy.
Volume (Year): 36 (2011)
Issue (Month): 3 (September)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467
Human rights Mineral Taxation Maximum available resources Mining;
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Anthony Bebbington & Leonith Hinojosa & Denise Humphreys Bebbington & Maria Luisa Burneo & Ximena Warnaars, 2008. "Contention and Ambiguity: Mining and the Possibilities of Development," Brooks World Poverty Institute Working Paper Series 5708, BWPI, The University of Manchester.
- Stevens, Paul & Dietsche, Evelyn, 2008. "Resource curse: An analysis of causes, experiences and possible ways forward," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 56-65, January.
- Estrella Peinado-Vara, 2005. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Latin America: Responsible Solutions to Business and Social Problems," IDB Publications 41538, Inter-American Development Bank.
- O'Regan, Bernadette & Moles, Richard, 2004. "The dynamics of relative attractiveness--a case study in mineral exploration and development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 73-87, May.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.