IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jotrge/v56y2016icp36-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transportation network company wait times in Greater Seattle, and relationship to socioeconomic indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Hughes, Ryan
  • MacKenzie, Don

Abstract

Transportation network companies (TNC) which use smartphone apps to connect travelers to drivers for point to point, intra-city trips have expanded rapidly in recent years, yet the impacts of their services on urban transportation systems, for good or ill, are not fully understood. These services may increase access to transportation for some individuals, but it is unclear whether these benefits are equitably distributed across different neighborhoods. In this paper, we explore the spatial variability in wait times for a TNC vehicle throughout the Seattle, WA region, testing whether areas with lower average income or a greater percentage of minorities experience different waiting times than other areas. We collected approximately 1 million observations of estimated waiting times, quasi-randomly sampled over approximately two months in 2015. We analyzed spatial and temporal patterns using local regression, which suggested lower wait times in densely populated areas of the Seattle region, and the lowest wait times during midday hours. We developed a spatial error regression model to investigate relationships between wait times and socioeconomic indicators at the census block group (CBG) level. We find that conditional on other covariates, expected waiting times are longer in CBGs with higher average income, and shorter in CBGs with greater population density and employment density. After adjusting for differences in density and income, a higher percentage of minorities in a CBG is associated with longer waiting times late at night and shorter waiting times during the day, with an average effect of close to zero. Geographically weighted regression indicates that the strength, and in some cases the sign, of these relationships varies throughout the Seattle region. Overall, the results suggests that transportation network companies offer higher performance in dense urban areas, and that adequate access to TNC services is not necessarily restricted to areas that are “white and wealthy.”

Suggested Citation

  • Hughes, Ryan & MacKenzie, Don, 2016. "Transportation network company wait times in Greater Seattle, and relationship to socioeconomic indicators," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 36-44.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:56:y:2016:i:c:p:36-44
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.08.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692316301430
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.08.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan V. Hall & Alan B. Krueger, 2015. "An Analysis of the Labor Market for Uber's Driver-Partners in the United States," Working Papers 587, Princeton University, Department of Economics, Industrial Relations Section..
    2. Donald Anderson, 2014. "“Not just a taxi”? For-profit ridesharing, driver strategies, and VMT," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(5), pages 1099-1117, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Zhengtian & Yin, Yafeng & Zha, Liteng, 2017. "Optimal parking provision for ride-sourcing services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 559-578.
    2. Punel, Aymeric & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2017. "Modeling the acceptability of crowdsourced goods deliveries: Role of context and experience effects," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 18-38.
    3. Rayle, Lisa & Dai, Danielle & Chan, Nelson & Cervero, Robert & Shaheen, Susan, 2016. "Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 168-178.
    4. Cristiano Codagnone & Fabienne Abadie & Federico Biagi, 2016. "The Future of Work in the ‘Sharing Economy’. Market Efficiency and Equitable Opportunities or Unfair Precarisation?," JRC Research Reports JRC101280, Joint Research Centre.
    5. Scott Duke Kominers & Alexander Teytelboym & Vincent P Crawford, 2017. "An invitation to market design," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(4), pages 541-571.
    6. Wang, Wei & Miao, Wei & Liu, Yongdong & Deng, Yiting & Cao, Yunfei, 2022. "The impact of COVID-19 on the ride-sharing industry and its recovery: Causal evidence from China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 128-141.
    7. Emmanuelle Reuter, 2022. "Hybrid business models in the sharing economy: The role of business model design for managing the environmental paradox," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 603-618, February.
    8. Berger, Thor & Chen, Chinchih & Frey, Carl Benedikt, 2018. "Drivers of disruption? Estimating the Uber effect," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 197-210.
    9. de Pedraza, Pablo & Vollbracht, Ian, 2020. "The Semicircular Flow of the Data Economy and the Data Sharing Laffer curve," GLO Discussion Paper Series 515, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    10. Jokinen, Jani-Pekka & Sihvola, Teemu & Mladenovic, Milos N., 2019. "Policy lessons from the flexible transport service pilot Kutsuplus in the Helsinki Capital Region," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 123-133.
    11. Jeremy Horpedahl, 2015. "Ideology Über Alles? Economics Bloggers on Uber, Lyft, and Other Transportation Network Companies," Econ Journal Watch, Econ Journal Watch, vol. 12(3), pages 360–374-3, September.
    12. Bauer, Johannes M., 2018. "The Internet and income inequality: Socio-economic challenges in a hyperconnected society," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 333-343.
    13. Sutirtha Bagchi, 2018. "A Tale of Two Cities: An Examination of Medallion Prices in New York and Chicago," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 53(2), pages 295-319, September.
    14. Cristiano Codagnone & Federico Biagi & Fabienne Abadie, 2016. "The Passions and the Interests: Unpacking the ‘Sharing Economy’," JRC Research Reports JRC101279, Joint Research Centre.
    15. Sen Li & Kameshwar Poolla & Pravin Varaiya, 2020. "Impact of Congestion Charge and Minimum Wage on TNCs: A Case Study for San Francisco," Papers 2003.02550, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    16. David P. Baron, 2018. "Disruptive Entrepreneurship and Dual Purpose Strategies: The Case of Uber," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 439-462, June.
    17. Alejandro Henao & Wesley E. Marshall, 2019. "The impact of ride-hailing on vehicle miles traveled," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2173-2194, December.
    18. Virginie Boutueil & Kei Tanikawa Obregón & Anna Voskoboynikova, 2019. "Exploring shared mobility services beyond the common-sense understanding: a combination of diachronic and spatial analysis based on case studies of Paris and London," Post-Print hal-02422161, HAL.
    19. Ting Wang & Yong Zhang & Meiye Li & Lei Liu, 2019. "How Do Passengers with Different Using Frequencies Choose between Traditional Taxi Service and Online Car-Hailing Service? A Case Study of Nanjing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-18, November.
    20. Hossain, Mokter & Mozahem, Najib Ali, 2022. "Drivers’ perceptions of the sharing economy for transport services," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jotrge:v:56:y:2016:i:c:p:36-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-transport-geography .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.