IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v156y2023ics0148296322009286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

They’re vs They Are: Contractions influence product choice and judgments

Author

Listed:
  • Chan, Eugene Y.
  • Meng, Yan

Abstract

Contractions are common in both written and spoken English. For example, it is common to use “they’re” instead of “they are.” Contractions are also popular in marketing communications and ad copy. However, despite the popularity of contractions, there is no existing work on how their use can influence individuals’ information processing. Given that language—not just the text but also linguistic forms—can exert an influence on information processing, the possibility that contractions might also do so warrants investigation. Across three experiments, we examine the effect of contractions on consumers’ product choices and judgments. We find that contractions increase choice for products that are higher on feasibility (vs desirability) and those with secondary (vs primary) features while they decreased intentions to engage in COVID-protection behaviors that would be high on feasibility. These effects are consistent with greater concrete thinking. Thus, we situate our research within Construal Level Theory to propose that contractions have an effect on individuals’ cognition, which we demonstrate in consumption-relevant settings. Our work contributes to marketing theory and practice. But, since our effect is novel, in our General Discussion, we also highlight limitations to our work and offer suggestions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Chan, Eugene Y. & Meng, Yan, 2023. "They’re vs They Are: Contractions influence product choice and judgments," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:156:y:2023:i:c:s0148296322009286
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296322009286
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun, Jin & Keh, Hean Tat & Lee, Angela Y., 2019. "Shaping consumer preference using alignable attributes: The roles of regulatory orientation and construal level," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 151-168.
    2. Lawrence E. Williams & Randy Stein & Laura Galguera, 2014. "The Distinct Affective Consequences of Psychological Distance and Construal Level," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 40(6), pages 1123-1138.
    3. Kiyoung Chang & Ying Li & Ha‐Chin Yi, 2021. "Informed equity ownership and bank loan contracting," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(7-8), pages 1368-1403, July.
    4. Carnevale, Marina & Luna, David & Lerman, Dawn, 2017. "Brand linguistics: A theory-driven framework for the study of language in branding," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 572-591.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariela E Jaffé & Rainer Greifeneder & Marc-André Reinhard, 2019. "Manipulating the odds: The effects of Machiavellianism and construal level on cheating behavior," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Poushneh, Atieh, 2021. "How close do we feel to virtual product to make a purchase decision? Impact of perceived proximity to virtual product and temporal purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Jamel Khenfer & Caroline Cuny, 2021. "Comment communiquer l'action par la sonorité des noms de marques ?," Post-Print hal-03189334, HAL.
    4. Prashanth Ravula, 2023. "Impact of delivery performance on online review ratings: the role of temporal distance of ratings," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(2), pages 149-159, June.
    5. Bernhard Swoboda & Carolina Sinning, 2021. "Endorsement of Global Product Brands by Global Corporate Brands – A Consumer Perspective Across Nations," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 61(4), pages 563-598, August.
    6. Ruth N. Bolton & Anders Gustafsson & Crina O. Tarasi & Lars Witell, 2022. "Designing satisfying service encounters: website versus store touchpoints," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 85-107, January.
    7. Jie, Yun & Li, Ye, 2022. "Chronological cues and consumers’ preference for mere newness," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 527-541.
    8. David L. Alexander & Ashley Stadler Blank, 2018. "Besting the status quo: the effect of abstract versus concrete mindsets on emotional trade-off difficulty and avoidant coping behavior," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 351-362, September.
    9. Mariela E Jaffé & Maria Douneva, 2020. "Secretive and close? How sharing secrets may impact perceptions of distance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, June.
    10. Jihoon Cho & Swinder Janda, 2023. "Perception carryover in cross-buying: the role of interpurchase time and product locus," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(4), pages 809-819, December.
    11. Ryan S Elder & Ann E Schlosser & Morgan Poor & Lidan Xu & Darren DahlEditor & JoAndrea HoeggAssociate Editor, 2017. "So Close I Can Almost Sense It: The Interplay between Sensory Imagery and Psychological Distance," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 44(4), pages 877-894.
    12. Reichert, Michael Justus & Fantapié-Altobelli, Claudia, 2016. "Country-of-origin effects in industrial goods markets: Do country-of-origin image effects differ for different buying center members?," jbm - Journal of Business Market Management, Free University Berlin, Marketing Department, vol. 9(2), pages 623-649.
    13. Zhang, Zuomin & Dai, Ling, 2023. "The bank loan distribution effect of government spending expansion: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    14. Florence Jeannot & Eline Jongmans & Maud Dampérat, 2022. "Visual design and online shopping experiences: When expertise allows consumers to refocus on website attractiveness," Post-Print halshs-04159592, HAL.
    15. Herter, Márcia Maurer & Borges, Adilson & Pinto, Diego Costa, 2021. "Which emotions make you healthier? The effects of sadness, embarrassment, and construal level on healthy behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 147-158.
    16. Chatterjee, Swagato & Kittur, Prathamesh & Vishwakarma, Pankaj & Dey, Anirban, 2023. "What makes customers of airport lounges satisfied and more? Impact of culture and travel class," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    17. Khenfer, Jamel & Cuny, Caroline, 2020. "Brand preference in the face of control loss and service failure: The role of the sound of brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    18. Xiaoyu Wang & Hean Tat Keh & Hongrui Zhao & Yijie Ai, 2020. "Touch vs. click: how computer interfaces polarize consumers’ evaluations," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 265-277, September.
    19. Huda Khan & Richard Lee, 2020. "A sociolinguistic perspective of the effects of packaging in bilingual markets," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(2), pages 130-142, March.
    20. Guizzardi, Andrea & Mariani, Marcello M. & Stacchini, Annalisa, 2022. "A temporal construal theory explanation of the price-quality relationship in online dynamic pricing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 32-44.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:156:y:2023:i:c:s0148296322009286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.