IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v96y2021icp185-198.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pareto-optimal reinsurance policies with maximal synergy

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Wenjun
  • Hong, Hanping
  • Ren, Jiandong

Abstract

Optimal reinsurance policies have been studied extensively in the economics and insurance literature. Two types of optimality criteria, expected utility (EU) maximization and risk minimization, are commonly used. Understandably, applying the two types of criteria usually will result in different “optimal” policies. To reconcile the conflicting interests of the insurer and reinsurer and strike a balance between EU maximization and risk minimization, we follow the approach in Borch (1960b) but assume that the involved two parties both apply distortion risk measures instead of variance. We first identify a set of reinsurance policies that minimize the total risk borne by the two parties, then we take this set of policies as admissible and derive the Pareto-optimal policies that maximize the weighted EU of these two parties. A Nash bargaining model is applied to identify the “best” weights allocated to the two parties. In addition, we extend our results to a situation where the insurer’s decision making is dictated by the rank-dependent expected utility (RDEU) theory. Finally, we present numerical examples to show the applicability of our methodology and some implications of the obtained results.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Wenjun & Hong, Hanping & Ren, Jiandong, 2021. "Pareto-optimal reinsurance policies with maximal synergy," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 185-198.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:96:y:2021:i:c:p:185-198
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.11.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668720301591
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2020.11.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nash, John, 1953. "Two-Person Cooperative Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 21(1), pages 128-140, April.
    2. Chi, Yichun & Zhuang, Sheng Chao, 2020. "Optimal insurance with belief heterogeneity and incentive compatibility," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 104-114.
    3. Carole Bernard & Xuedong He & Jia-An Yan & Xun Yu Zhou, 2015. "Optimal Insurance Design Under Rank-Dependent Expected Utility," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 154-186, January.
    4. Boonen, Tim J., 2016. "Nash equilibria of Over-The-Counter bargaining for insurance risk redistributions: The role of a regulator," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 955-965.
    5. Quiggin, John, 1982. "A theory of anticipated utility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 323-343, December.
    6. Alejandro Balbás & José Garrido & Silvia Mayoral, 2009. "Properties of Distortion Risk Measures," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 385-399, September.
    7. Gur Huberman & David Mayers & Clifford W. Smith Jr., 1983. "Optimal Insurance Policy Indemnity Schedules," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 14(2), pages 415-426, Autumn.
    8. Jiang, Wenjun & Ren, Jiandong & Yang, Chen & Hong, Hanping, 2019. "On optimal reinsurance treaties in cooperative game under heterogeneous beliefs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 173-184.
    9. Rama Cont & Romain Deguest & Giacomo Scandolo, 2010. "Robustness and sensitivity analysis of risk measurement procedures," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(6), pages 593-606.
    10. Boonen, Tim J. & Ghossoub, Mario, 2020. "Bilateral Risk Sharing With Heterogeneous Beliefs And Exposure Constraints," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(1), pages 293-323, January.
    11. Assa, Hirbod, 2015. "On optimal reinsurance policy with distortion risk measures and premiums," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 70-75.
    12. Borch, Karl, 1960. "Reciprocal Reinsurance Treaties," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(4), pages 170-191, December.
    13. Cai, Jun & Tan, Ken Seng, 2007. "Optimal Retention for a Stop-loss Reinsurance Under the VaR and CTE Risk Measures," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(1), pages 93-112, May.
    14. Wenjun Jiang & Jiandong Ren & Ričardas Zitikis, 2017. "Optimal Reinsurance Policies under the VaR Risk Measure When the Interests of Both the Cedent and the Reinsurer Are Taken into Account," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, February.
    15. Hung-Hsi Huang, 2006. "Optimal insurance contract under a value-at-risk constraint," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, Springer;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 31(2), pages 91-110, December.
    16. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5394 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Ghossoub, Mario, 2019. "Optimal insurance under rank-dependent expected utility," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 51-66.
    18. Cai, Jun & Lemieux, Christiane & Liu, Fangda, 2016. "Optimal Reinsurance From The Perspectives Of Both An Insurer And A Reinsurer," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(3), pages 815-849, September.
    19. Nash, John, 1950. "The Bargaining Problem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 18(2), pages 155-162, April.
    20. Dhaene, J. & Denuit, M. & Goovaerts, M. J. & Kaas, R. & Vyncke, D., 2002. "The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 3-33, August.
    21. A. Y. Golubin, 2006. "Pareto‐Optimal Insurance Policies in the Models with a Premium Based on the Actuarial Value," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 73(3), pages 469-487, September.
    22. Paul Embrechts & Haiyan Liu & Tiantian Mao & Ruodu Wang, 2017. "Quantile-Based Risk Sharing with Heterogeneous Beliefs," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 17-65, Swiss Finance Institute, revised Jan 2018.
    23. Lo, Ambrose, 2017. "A Neyman-Pearson Perspective On Optimal Reinsurance With Constraints," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 47(2), pages 467-499, May.
    24. Hung-Hsi Huang, 2006. "Optimal insurance contract under a value-at-risk constraint," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 31(2), pages 91-110, December.
    25. Osuna, Edgar Elias, 2012. "Crossing points of distributions and a theorem that relates them to second order stochastic dominance," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(4), pages 758-764.
    26. Dhaene, J. & Denuit, M. & Goovaerts, M. J. & Kaas, R. & Vyncke, D., 2002. "The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: applications," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 133-161, October.
    27. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Badescu, Alexandru M. & Verdonck, Tim, 2013. "Optimal risk transfer under quantile-based risk measurers," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 252-265.
    28. Rama Cont & Romain Deguest & Giacomo Scandolo, 2010. "Robustness and sensitivity analysis of risk measurement procedures," Post-Print hal-00413729, HAL.
    29. Zuo Quan Xu & Xun Yu Zhou & Sheng Chao Zhuang, 2019. "Optimal insurance under rank‐dependent utility and incentive compatibility," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 659-692, April.
    30. Wang, Shaun S. & Young, Virginia R. & Panjer, Harry H., 1997. "Axiomatic characterization of insurance prices," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 173-183, November.
    31. Asimit, Vali & Boonen, Tim J., 2018. "Insurance with multiple insurers: A game-theoretic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(2), pages 778-790.
    32. Guillaume Carlier & Rose-Anne Dana, 2003. "Pareto efficient insurance contracts when the insurer's cost function is discontinuous," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 21(4), pages 871-893, June.
    33. Chunyang Zhou & Chongfeng Wu, 2009. "Optimal Insurance Under the Insurer's VaR Constraint," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 34(2), pages 140-154, December.
    34. Zhuang, Sheng Chao & Weng, Chengguo & Tan, Ken Seng & Assa, Hirbod, 2016. "Marginal Indemnification Function formulation for optimal reinsurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 65-76.
    35. Lemaire, Jean, 1991. "Cooperative Game Theory and its Insurance Applications," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 17-40, April.
    36. Carole Bernard & Weidong Tian, 2010. "Insurance Market Effects of Risk Management Metrics," The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics (The Geneva Association), vol. 35(1), pages 47-80, June.
    37. Raviv, Artur, 1979. "The Design of an Optimal Insurance Policy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(1), pages 84-96, March.
    38. Cai, Jun & Liu, Haiyan & Wang, Ruodu, 2017. "Pareto-optimal reinsurance arrangements under general model settings," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 24-37.
    39. Boonen, Tim J. & Ghossoub, Mario, 2019. "On the existence of a representative reinsurer under heterogeneous beliefs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 209-225.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boonen, Tim J. & Jiang, Wenjun, 2022. "Bilateral risk sharing in a comonotone market with rank-dependent utilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 361-378.
    2. Khreshna Syuhada & Arief Hakim & Suci Sari, 2021. "The Combined Stop-Loss and Quota-Share Reinsurance: Conditional Tail Expectation-Based Optimization from the Joint Perspective of Insurer and Reinsurer," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Ghossoub, Mario & Jiang, Wenjun & Ren, Jiandong, 2022. "Pareto-optimal reinsurance under individual risk constraints," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 307-325.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Boonen, Tim J. & Jiang, Wenjun, 2022. "Bilateral risk sharing in a comonotone market with rank-dependent utilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 361-378.
    2. Ghossoub, Mario & Jiang, Wenjun & Ren, Jiandong, 2022. "Pareto-optimal reinsurance under individual risk constraints," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 307-325.
    3. Boonen, Tim J. & Jiang, Wenjun, 2022. "A marginal indemnity function approach to optimal reinsurance under the Vajda condition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 928-944.
    4. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Cheung, Ka Chun & Chong, Wing Fung & Hu, Junlei, 2020. "Pareto-optimal insurance contracts with premium budget and minimum charge constraints," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 17-27.
    5. Chi, Yichun & Zhuang, Sheng Chao, 2020. "Optimal insurance with belief heterogeneity and incentive compatibility," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 104-114.
    6. Corina Birghila & Tim J. Boonen & Mario Ghossoub, 2023. "Optimal insurance under maxmin expected utility," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 467-501, April.
    7. Zhuo Jin & Zuo Quan Xu & Bin Zou, 2023. "Optimal moral-hazard-free reinsurance under extended distortion premium principles," Papers 2304.08819, arXiv.org.
    8. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Boonen, Tim J. & Chi, Yichun & Chong, Wing Fung, 2021. "Risk sharing with multiple indemnity environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 587-603.
    9. Boonen, Tim J. & Ghossoub, Mario, 2021. "Optimal reinsurance with multiple reinsurers: Distortion risk measures, distortion premium principles, and heterogeneous beliefs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PA), pages 23-37.
    10. Ambrose Lo & Zhaofeng Tang, 2019. "Pareto-optimal reinsurance policies in the presence of individual risk constraints," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 274(1), pages 395-423, March.
    11. Cai, Jun & Liu, Haiyan & Wang, Ruodu, 2017. "Pareto-optimal reinsurance arrangements under general model settings," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 24-37.
    12. Tim J. Boonen & Fangda Liu & Ruodu Wang, 2021. "Competitive equilibria in a comonotone market," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(4), pages 1217-1255, November.
    13. Wenjun Jiang & Jiandong Ren & Ričardas Zitikis, 2017. "Optimal Reinsurance Policies under the VaR Risk Measure When the Interests of Both the Cedent and the Reinsurer Are Taken into Account," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-22, February.
    14. Jiang, Wenjun & Ren, Jiandong & Yang, Chen & Hong, Hanping, 2019. "On optimal reinsurance treaties in cooperative game under heterogeneous beliefs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 173-184.
    15. Boonen, Tim J. & Ghossoub, Mario, 2019. "On the existence of a representative reinsurer under heterogeneous beliefs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 209-225.
    16. Boonen, Tim J. & Tan, Ken Seng & Zhuang, Sheng Chao, 2021. "Optimal reinsurance with multiple reinsurers: Competitive pricing and coalition stability," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 302-319.
    17. Corina Birghila & Tim J. Boonen & Mario Ghossoub, 2020. "Optimal Insurance under Maxmin Expected Utility," Papers 2010.07383, arXiv.org.
    18. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Bignozzi, Valeria & Cheung, Ka Chun & Hu, Junlei & Kim, Eun-Seok, 2017. "Robust and Pareto optimality of insurance contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 720-732.
    19. Ruodu Wang & Ričardas Zitikis, 2021. "An Axiomatic Foundation for the Expected Shortfall," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1413-1429, March.
    20. Lauzier, Jean-Gabriel & Lin, Liyuan & Wang, Ruodu, 2023. "Pairwise counter-monotonicity," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 279-287.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:96:y:2021:i:c:p:185-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.