IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/insuma/v64y2015icp409-416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Convex ordering for insurance preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Cheung, K.C.
  • Chong, W.F.
  • Yam, S.C.P.

Abstract

In this article, we study two broad classes of convex order related optimal insurance decision problems, in which the objective function or the premium valuation is a general functional of the expectation, Value-at-Risk and Average Value-at-Risk of the loss variables. These two classes of problems include many existing and contemporary optimal insurance problems as interesting examples being prevalent in the literature. To solve these problems, we apply the Karlin–Novikoff–Stoyan–Taylor multiple-crossing conditions, which is a useful sufficient criterion in the theory of convex ordering, to replace an arbitrary insurance indemnity by a more favorable one in convex order sense. The convex ordering established provides a unifying approach to solve the special cases of the problem classes. We show that the optimal indemnities for these problems in general take the double layer form.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheung, K.C. & Chong, W.F. & Yam, S.C.P., 2015. "Convex ordering for insurance preferences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 409-416.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:64:y:2015:i:c:p:409-416
    DOI: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2015.06.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167668715300330
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2015.06.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Denuit, Michel & Dhaene, Jan, 2012. "Convex order and comonotonic conditional mean risk sharing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 265-270.
    2. Cheung, K.C. & Chong, W.F. & Yam, S.C.P., 2015. "The optimal insurance under disappointment theories," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 77-90.
    3. Christian Gollier & Harris Schlesinger, 1996. "Arrow's theorem on the optimality of deductibles: A stochastic dominance approach (*)," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 7(2), pages 359-363.
    4. Carole Bernard & Weidong Tian, 2009. "Optimal Reinsurance Arrangements Under Tail Risk Measures," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 76(3), pages 709-725, September.
    5. Chi, Yichun & Tan, Ken Seng, 2013. "Optimal reinsurance with general premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 180-189.
    6. Cai, Jun & Wei, Wei, 2012. "Optimal reinsurance with positively dependent risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 57-63.
    7. Gul, Faruk, 1991. "A Theory of Disappointment Aversion," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 667-686, May.
    8. Philippe Delquié & Alessandra Cillo, 2006. "Disappointment without prior expectation: a unifying perspective on decision under risk," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 197-215, December.
    9. Balbás, Alejandro & Balbás, Beatriz & Heras, Antonio, 2009. "Optimal reinsurance with general risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 374-384, June.
    10. Rob Kaas & Marc Goovaerts & Jan Dhaene & Michel Denuit, 2008. "Modern Actuarial Risk Theory," Springer Books, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-540-70998-5, September.
    11. Dhaene, J. & Denuit, M. & Goovaerts, M. J. & Kaas, R. & Vyncke, D., 2002. "The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: theory," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 3-33, August.
    12. Dhaene, J. & Denuit, M. & Goovaerts, M. J. & Kaas, R. & Vyncke, D., 2002. "The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: applications," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 133-161, October.
    13. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Badescu, Alexandru M. & Verdonck, Tim, 2013. "Optimal risk transfer under quantile-based risk measurers," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 252-265.
    14. Guerra, Manuel & Centeno, Maria de Lourdes, 2010. "Optimal Reinsurance for Variance Related Premium Calculation Principles 1," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(1), pages 97-121, May.
    15. Marek Kaluszka & Andrzej Okolewski, 2008. "An Extension of Arrow's Result on Optimal Reinsurance Contract," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 75(2), pages 275-288, June.
    16. Dhaene, Jan & Goovaerts, Marc & Vanmaele, Michèle & Van Weert, Koen, 2012. "Convex order approximations in the case of cash flows of mixed signs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 249-256.
    17. Cai, Jun & Tan, Ken Seng & Weng, Chengguo & Zhang, Yi, 2008. "Optimal reinsurance under VaR and CTE risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 185-196, August.
    18. Tan, Ken Seng & Weng, Chengguo & Zhang, Yi, 2011. "Optimality of general reinsurance contracts under CTE risk measure," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 175-187, September.
    19. Chi, Yichun, 2012. "Optimal reinsurance under variance related premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 310-321.
    20. Chi, Yichun, 2012. "Reinsurance Arrangements Minimizing the Risk-Adjusted Value of an Insurer's Liability," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(2), pages 529-557, November.
    21. Sung, K.C.J. & Yam, S.C.P. & Yung, S.P. & Zhou, J.H., 2011. "Behavioral optimal insurance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 418-428.
    22. Ohlin, Jan, 1969. "On a class of measures of dispersion with application to optimal reinsurance," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(2), pages 249-266, May.
    23. Graham Loomes & Robert Sugden, 1986. "Disappointment and Dynamic Consistency in Choice under Uncertainty," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 53(2), pages 271-282.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boonen, Tim J. & Jiang, Wenjun, 2022. "Bilateral risk sharing in a comonotone market with rank-dependent utilities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 361-378.
    2. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Boonen, Tim J. & Chi, Yichun & Chong, Wing Fung, 2021. "Risk sharing with multiple indemnity environments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(2), pages 587-603.
    3. Arthur Charpentier & Lariosse Kouakou & Matthias Lowe & Philipp Ratz & Franck Vermet, 2021. "Collaborative Insurance Sustainability and Network Structure," Papers 2107.02764, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    4. Balbás, Alejandro & Balbás, Beatriz & Balbás, Raquel, 2018. "Golden options in financial mathematics," INDEM - Working Paper Business Economic Series 27672, Instituto para el Desarrollo Empresarial (INDEM).
    5. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Cheung, Ka Chun & Chong, Wing Fung & Hu, Junlei, 2020. "Pareto-optimal insurance contracts with premium budget and minimum charge constraints," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 17-27.
    6. Martin, Elliot PhD & Shaheen, Susan PhD & Stocker, Adam, 2021. "Impacts of Transportation Network Companies on Vehicle Miles Traveled, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Travel Behavior Analysis from the Washington D.C., Los Angeles, and San Francisco Markets," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt90b6d7r3, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    7. Liang, Xiaoqing & Jiang, Wenjun & Zhang, Yiying, 2023. "Optimal insurance design under mean-variance preference with narrow framing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 59-79.
    8. Ghossoub, Mario & Jiang, Wenjun & Ren, Jiandong, 2022. "Pareto-optimal reinsurance under individual risk constraints," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 307-325.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chi, Yichun & Weng, Chengguo, 2013. "Optimal reinsurance subject to Vajda condition," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 179-189.
    2. Zhu, Yunzhou & Chi, Yichun & Weng, Chengguo, 2014. "Multivariate reinsurance designs for minimizing an insurer’s capital requirement," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 144-155.
    3. Cheung, K.C. & Chong, W.F. & Yam, S.C.P., 2015. "The optimal insurance under disappointment theories," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 77-90.
    4. Chi, Yichun, 2018. "Insurance choice under third degree stochastic dominance," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 198-205.
    5. Jianfa Cong & Ken Tan, 2016. "Optimal VaR-based risk management with reinsurance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 177-202, February.
    6. Jianfa Cong & Ken Seng Tan, 2016. "Optimal VaR-based risk management with reinsurance," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 237(1), pages 177-202, February.
    7. Guerra, Manuel & Centeno, M.L., 2012. "Are quantile risk measures suitable for risk-transfer decisions?," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 446-461.
    8. Chi, Yichun & Liu, Fangda, 2017. "Optimal insurance design in the presence of exclusion clauses," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 185-195.
    9. Sun, Haoze & Weng, Chengguo & Zhang, Yi, 2017. "Optimal multivariate quota-share reinsurance: A nonparametric mean-CVaR framework," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 197-214.
    10. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Badescu, Alexandru M. & Cheung, Ka Chun, 2013. "Optimal reinsurance in the presence of counterparty default risk," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 690-697.
    11. Asimit, Alexandru V. & Chi, Yichun & Hu, Junlei, 2015. "Optimal non-life reinsurance under Solvency II Regime," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 227-237.
    12. Cui, Wei & Yang, Jingping & Wu, Lan, 2013. "Optimal reinsurance minimizing the distortion risk measure under general reinsurance premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 74-85.
    13. Mi Chen & Wenyuan Wang & Ruixing Ming, 2016. "Optimal Reinsurance Under General Law-Invariant Convex Risk Measure and TVaR Premium Principle," Risks, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Ghossoub, Mario, 2019. "Budget-constrained optimal insurance without the nonnegativity constraint on indemnities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 22-39.
    15. Chi, Yichun & Tan, Ken Seng, 2013. "Optimal reinsurance with general premium principles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 180-189.
    16. Wang, Ching-Ping & Huang, Hung-Hsi, 2016. "Optimal insurance contract under VaR and CVaR constraints," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 110-127.
    17. Lu, ZhiYi & Meng, LiLi & Wang, Yujin & Shen, Qingjie, 2016. "Optimal reinsurance under VaR and TVaR risk measures in the presence of reinsurer’s risk limit," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 92-100.
    18. Alejandro Balbas & Beatriz Balbas & Raquel Balbas, 2013. "Optimal Reinsurance: A Risk Sharing Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-12, August.
    19. Yinzhi Wang & Erik B{o}lviken, 2019. "How much is optimal reinsurance degraded by error?," Papers 1912.04175, arXiv.org.
    20. Yuxia Huang & Chuancun Yin, 2018. "A unifying approach to constrained and unconstrained optimal reinsurance," Papers 1807.06892, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:insuma:v:64:y:2015:i:c:p:409-416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505554 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.