IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ininma/v36y2016i6p1193-1204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of technology type and life cycle on IT productivity variance: A contingency theoretical perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Xiaobo
  • Zhang, Weiyong
  • Li, Ling

Abstract

The relationship between IT investment and performance improvement has been a classic research subject. In earlier research it was characterized as the famous “IT productivity paradox.” Decades of research effort later, many IS/IT researchers no longer consider this relationship paradoxical, but it remains a challenge to fully explain “IT productivity variance,” that is, a large portion of unexplainable performance variance observed in empirical studies. In this paper, we take a theory development approach to this important issue. Our effort focuses on examining the theoretical foundation of “IT productivity variance.” Through literature review, we identify and contrast three prevailing theoretical perspectives to suggest the plausibility of a contingency approach. Contextual factors can significantly affect the relationship between IT investment and performance improvement. We identified three such factors that were not thoroughly examined: level of performance measurement, technology type, and technology life cycle. We subsequently propose a contingency model in light of these factors, and develop a set of research propositions. Our effort is a first-step toward bridging a major gap in the literature. The proposed model, while awaiting empirical validation, can provide useful guidance to practicing managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Xiaobo & Zhang, Weiyong & Li, Ling, 2016. "The impact of technology type and life cycle on IT productivity variance: A contingency theoretical perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1193-1204.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:36:y:2016:i:6:p:1193-1204
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.08.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401216301839
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.08.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajiv Kohli & Sarv Devaraj, 2003. "Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta-Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm-Level Empirical Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 127-145, June.
    2. Malik M.A. Khalfan & Mukesh Kashyap & Xianguang Li & Carl Abbott, 2010. "Knowledge management in construction supply chain integration," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2/3), pages 207-221.
    3. Huang, Shi-Ming & Ou, Chin-Shyh & Chen, Chyi-Miaw & Lin, Binshan, 2006. "An empirical study of relationship between IT investment and firm performance: A resource-based perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(3), pages 984-999, September.
    4. Yao‐Sheng Liao, 2011. "The effect of human resource management control systems on the relationship between knowledge management strategy and firm performance," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(5/6), pages 494-511, August.
    5. Danny Miller, 1992. "Environmental Fit Versus Internal Fit," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(2), pages 159-178, May.
    6. Phil Nixon & Megan Harrington & David Parker, 2012. "Leadership performance is significant to project success or failure: a critical analysis," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 61(2), pages 204-216, January.
    7. Landon Kleis & Paul Chwelos & Ronald V. Ramirez & Iain Cockburn, 2012. "Information Technology and Intangible Output: The Impact of IT Investment on Innovation Productivity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 42-59, March.
    8. Indranil R. Bardhan & Vish V. Krishnan & Shu Lin, 2007. "Project Performance and the Enabling Role of Information Technology: An Exploratory Study on the Role of Alignment," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 579-595, May.
    9. Karlsson, Charlie & Nystrom, Kristina, 2003. "Exit and Entry over the Product Life Cycle: Evidence from the Swedish Manufacturing Industry," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 135-144, September.
    10. Anandhi S. Bharadwaj & Sundar G. Bharadwaj & Benn R. Konsynski, 1999. "Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's q," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(7), pages 1008-1024, July.
    11. Stephan Kudyba & Romesh Diwan, 2002. "Research Report: Increasing Returns to Information Technology," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 104-111, March.
    12. Cathal M. Brugha, 2001. "Implications from Decision Science for the Systems Development Life Cycle in Information Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 91-105, March.
    13. Anitesh Barua & Charles H. Kriebel & Tridas Mukhopadhyay, 1995. "Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 3-23, March.
    14. Neeraj Mittal & Barrie R. Nault, 2009. "Research Note ---Investments in Information Technology: Indirect Effects and Information Technology Intensity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 140-154, March.
    15. Sanjeev Dewan & Fei Ren, 2011. "Information Technology and Firm Boundaries: Impact on Firm Risk and Return Performance," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 369-388, June.
    16. Erik Brynjolfsson & Lorin M. Hitt, 2000. "Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 23-48, Fall.
    17. Jamie D. Collins & William J. Worthington & Pedro M. Reyes & Marisabel Romero, 2010. "Knowledge management, supply chain technologies, and firm performance," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(10), pages 947-960, September.
    18. Stephan Kudyba & Donald Vitaliano, 2003. "Information Technology and Corporate Profitability: A Focus on Operating Efficiency," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 16(1), pages 1-13, January.
    19. Myung Ko & Jan G. Clark & Daijin Ko, 2008. "Revisiting the Impact of Information Technology Investments on Productivity: An Empirical Investigation Using Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS)," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 21(3), pages 1-23, July.
    20. Bernard C. Beaudreau, 2010. "The dynamo and the computer: an engineering perspective on the modern productivity paradox," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 59(1), pages 7-17, January.
    21. Michael J. Tippins & Ravipreet S. Sohi, 2003. "IT competency and firm performance: is organizational learning a missing link?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(8), pages 745-761, August.
    22. R. A. Thietart & R. Vivas, 1984. "An Empirical Investigation of Success Strategies for Businesses Along the Product Life Cycle," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(12), pages 1405-1423, December.
    23. Barrie R. Nault & Mark B. Vandenbosch, 2000. "Research Report: Disruptive Technologies—Explaining Entry in Next Generation Information Technology Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 304-319, September.
    24. S. David Wu & Berrin Aytac & Rosemary T. Berger & Chris A. Armbruster, 2006. "Managing Short Life-Cycle Technology Products for Agere Systems," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 234-247, June.
    25. Qing Hu & Robert Plant, 2001. "An Empirical Study of the Casual Relationship Between IT Investment and Firm Performance," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 14(3), pages 15-26, July.
    26. Sangho Lee & Soung Hie Kim, 2006. "A Lag Effect of IT Investment on Firm Performance," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 19(1), pages 43-69, January.
    27. Thomas C. Powell & Anne Dent‐Micallef, 1997. "Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human, business, and technology resources," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(5), pages 375-405, May.
    28. Sang Lee & Jinhan Kim & Yeonog Choi & Sang-Gun Lee, 2009. "Effects of IT knowledge and media selection on operational performance of small firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 241-257, March.
    29. Sanjeev Dewan & Chung-ki Min, 1997. "The Substitution of Information Technology for Other Factors of Production: A Firm Level Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(12), pages 1660-1675, December.
    30. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 1996. "Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 63-92, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mamonov, Stanislav & Triantoro, Tamilla Mavlanova, 2018. "The strategic value of data resources in emergent industries," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 146-155.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefan Schweikl & Robert Obermaier, 2020. "Lessons from three decades of IT productivity research: towards a better understanding of IT-induced productivity effects," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(4), pages 461-507, November.
    2. Sinan Aral & Peter Weill, 2007. "IT Assets, Organizational Capabilities, and Firm Performance: How Resource Allocations and Organizational Differences Explain Performance Variation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(5), pages 763-780, October.
    3. Khallaf, Ashraf, 2012. "Information technology investments and nonfinancial measures: A research framework," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 109-121.
    4. Neeraj Mittal & Barrie R. Nault, 2009. "Research Note ---Investments in Information Technology: Indirect Effects and Information Technology Intensity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 140-154, March.
    5. Indranil Bardhan & Viswanathan Krishnan & Shu Lin, 2013. "Research Note ---Business Value of Information Technology: Testing the Interaction Effect of IT and R&D on Tobin's Q," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(4), pages 1147-1161, December.
    6. Saggi Nevo & Michael Wade & Wade D. Cook, 2010. "An empirical study of IT as a factor of production: The case of Net-enabled IT assets," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 323-335, July.
    7. Dawei Zhang & Zhuo (June) Cheng & Hasan A. Qurban H. Mohammad & Barrie R. Nault, 2015. "Research Commentary—Information Technology Substitution Revisited," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 480-495, September.
    8. Mohamad, Amri & Zainuddin, Yuserrie & Alam, Nafis & Kendall, Graham, 2017. "Does decentralized decision making increase company performance through its Information Technology infrastructure investment?," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 1-15.
    9. Guodong (Gordon) Gao & Lorin M. Hitt, 2012. "Information Technology and Trademarks: Implications for Product Variety," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1211-1226, June.
    10. Polák, Petr, 2017. "The productivity paradox: A meta-analysis," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 38-54.
    11. Koutroumpis, Pantelis & Leiponen, Aija & Thomas, Llewellyn D W, 2017. "The Young, the Old and the Innovative: The Impact of R&D on Firm Performance in ICT versus Other Sectors," ETLA Working Papers 51, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    12. Sarv Devaraj & Rajiv Kohli, 2003. "Performance Impacts of Information Technology: Is Actual Usage the Missing Link?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 273-289, March.
    13. Prasanna Tambe & Lorin M. Hitt, 2014. "Measuring Information Technology Spillovers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 53-71, March.
    14. Rajiv Kohli & Sarv Devaraj, 2003. "Measuring Information Technology Payoff: A Meta-Analysis of Structural Variables in Firm-Level Empirical Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 127-145, June.
    15. Vincent J. Shea & Kevin E. Dow & Alain Yee-Loong Chong & Eric W. T. Ngai, 0. "An examination of the long-term business value of investments in information technology," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-15.
    16. Hui-Ming Deanna Wang & Foo Nin Ho, 2023. "The Effects of Information Technology in Retailer Performance and Survival: The Case of Store-Based Retailers," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    17. Hu, Qing & Quan, Jing “Jim”, 2005. "Evaluating the impact of IT investments on productivity: a causal analysis at industry level," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 39-53.
    18. Guido Schryen, 2010. "Preserving Knowledge on IS Business Value," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 2(4), pages 233-244, August.
    19. Zhuo (June) Cheng & Arun Rai & Feng Tian & Sean Xin Xu, 2021. "Social Learning in Information Technology Investment: The Role of Board Interlocks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 547-576, January.
    20. Sunil Mithas & M. S. Krishnan & Claes Fornell, 2016. "Research Note—Information Technology, Customer Satisfaction, and Profit: Theory and Evidence," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 166-181, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ininma:v:36:y:2016:i:6:p:1193-1204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-information-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.