IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/hepoli/v127y2023icp60-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The 2021 proposal to increase market forces in the Australian residential aged-care sector

Author

Listed:
  • Cutler, Henry
  • Gu, Yuanyuan
  • Bilgrami, Anam
  • Partington, Andrew

Abstract

In Australia, the US and Europe, policy makers use markets to incentivise aged care providers to produce greater quality care. The Australian Government announced in 2021 that it would further increase market forces in residential aged care to improve quality. The proposals respond to poor quality found within residential aged care, with overuse of psychotropic medications and physical constraints, social isolation and neglect. This paper outlines the market-orientated reforms the Government seeks to implement, including the policy development pathway over the last two decades. It refers to a theoretical model of provider behaviour under administered prices, and empirical research on the impact of similar market-orientated reforms delivered elsewhere, to highlight the reforms' strengths, weaknesses, and potential market outcomes. This paper concludes by identifying additional reforms that could better incentivise care quality and offers lessons to countries that have sought to marketise their nursing home care sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Cutler, Henry & Gu, Yuanyuan & Bilgrami, Anam & Partington, Andrew, 2023. "The 2021 proposal to increase market forces in the Australian residential aged-care sector," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 60-65.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:127:y:2023:i:c:p:60-65
    DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.11.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851022002846
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.11.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herr, Annika & Hottenrott, Hanna, 2016. "Higher prices, higher quality? Evidence from German nursing homes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(2), pages 179-189.
    2. Gaynor, Martin & Town, Robert J., 2011. "Competition in Health Care Markets," Handbook of Health Economics, in: Mark V. Pauly & Thomas G. Mcguire & Pedro P. Barros (ed.), Handbook of Health Economics, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 499-637, Elsevier.
    3. R. Konetzka & Edward Norton & Sally Stearns, 2006. "Medicare payment changes and nursing home quality: effects on long-stay residents," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 173-189, September.
    4. Yong, Jongsay & Yang, Ou & Zhang, Yuting & Scott, Anthony, 2021. "Ownership, quality and prices of nursing homes in Australia: Why greater private sector participation did not improve performance," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(11), pages 1475-1481.
    5. Marcelo Coca Perraillon & R. Tamara Konetzka & Daifeng He & Rachel M. Werner, 2019. "Consumer Response to Composite Ratings of Nursing Home Quality," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(2), pages 165-190, Spring.
    6. Cohen, Joel W. & Spector, William D., 1996. "The effect of Medicaid reimbursement on quality of care in nursing homes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 23-48, February.
    7. Jongsay Yong & Ou Yang & Yuting Zhang & Anthony Scott, 2021. "Ownership, Quality and Prices of Nursing Homes in Australia: Why Greater Private Sector Participation Did Not Improve Performance," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2021n19, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    8. Chalkley, Martin & Malcomson, James M, 1998. "Contracting for Health Services with Unmonitored Quality," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 108(449), pages 1093-1110, July.
    9. Milstein, Ricarda & Schreyoegg, Jonas, 2016. "Pay for performance in the inpatient sector: A review of 34 P4P programs in 14 OECD countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(10), pages 1125-1140.
    10. L. Di Giorgio & M. Filippini & G. Masiero, 2016. "Is higher nursing home quality more costly?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 17(8), pages 1011-1026, November.
    11. Ferran Espuny Pujol & Ruth Hancock & Morten Hviid & Marcello Morciano & Stephen Pudney, 2021. "Market concentration, supply, quality and prices paid by local authorities in the English care home market," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(8), pages 1886-1909, August.
    12. Herr, Annika & Nguyen, Thu-Van & Schmitz, Hendrik, 2016. "Public reporting and the quality of care of German nursing homes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(10), pages 1162-1170.
    13. Hsu, Hui-Chuan & Chen, Chen-Fen, 2019. "LTC 2.0: The 2017 reform of home- and community-based long-term care in Taiwan," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(10), pages 912-916.
    14. Moore, Corey B., 2021. "Consumer directed care aged care reforms in Australia since 2009: A retrospective policy analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(5), pages 577-581.
    15. Martin B. Hackmann, 2019. "Incentivizing Better Quality of Care: The Role of Medicaid and Competition in the Nursing Home Industry," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(5), pages 1684-1716, May.
    16. Commission, Productivity, 2011. "Caring for older Australians," Inquiry Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 53.
    17. Marcelo Coca Perraillon & R. Tamara Konetzka & Daifeng He & Rachel M. Werner, 2019. "Consumer Response to Composite Ratings of Nursing Home Quality," American Journal of Health Economics, MIT Press, vol. 5(2), pages 165-190, Spring.
    18. Grabowski, David C., 2001. "Medicaid reimbursement and the quality of nursing home care," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 549-569, July.
    19. Jeongyoung Park & Rachel M. Werner, 2011. "Changes in the relationship between nursing home financial performance and quality of care under public reporting," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(7), pages 783-801, July.
    20. Kaambwa, Billingsley & Chen, Gang & Khadka, Jyoti & Milte, Rachel & Mpundu-Kaambwa, Christine & Woods, Taylor-Jade & Ratcliffe, Julie, 2021. "A preference for quality: Australian general public's willingness to pay for home and residential aged care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    21. Ou Yang & Jongsay Yong & Yuting Zhang & Anthony Scott, 2021. "Competition, prices and quality of residential aged care in Australia," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2021n02, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
    22. Zhao, Xin, 2016. "Competition, information, and quality: Evidence from nursing homes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 136-152.
    23. Werner, Rachel M. & Norton, Edward C. & Konetzka, R. Tamara & Polsky, Daniel, 2012. "Do consumers respond to publicly reported quality information? Evidence from nursing homes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 50-61.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arndt R. Reichert & Magdalena A. Stroka, 2018. "Nursing home prices and quality of care — Evidence from administrative data," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(1), pages 129-140, January.
    2. Susan Feng Lu & Konstantinos Serfes & Gerard Wedig & Bingxiao Wu, 2021. "Does Competition Improve Service Quality? The Case of Nursing Homes Where Public and Private Payers Coexist," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6493-6512, October.
    3. Cellini, Roberto & Siciliani, Luigi & Straume, Odd Rune, 2018. "A dynamic model of quality competition with endogenous prices," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 190-206.
    4. repec:zbw:rwirep:0470 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Herr, Annika & Nguyen, Thu-Van & Schmitz, Hendrik, 2016. "Public reporting and the quality of care of German nursing homes," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(10), pages 1162-1170.
    6. Dörte Heger & Annika Herr & Anne Mensen, 2022. "Paying for the view? How nursing home prices affect certified staffing ratios," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(8), pages 1618-1632, August.
    7. Zhao, Xin, 2016. "Competition, information, and quality: Evidence from nursing homes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 136-152.
    8. Domenico Lisi & Luigi Siciliani & Odd Rune Straume, 2020. "Hospital competition under pay‐for‐performance: Quality, mortality, and readmissions," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 289-314, April.
    9. Hendrik Schmitz & Magdalena A. Stroka‐Wetsch, 2020. "Determinants of nursing home choice: Does reported quality matter?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(7), pages 766-777, July.
    10. Christopher S. Brunt, 2023. "Assessing the impact of enforcement and compliance with minimum staffing standards on the quality of care in nursing homes: Evidence from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' staff star rat," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 235-276, February.
    11. Arndt R. Reicher & Magdalena Stroka, 2014. "Nursing Home Prices and Quality of Care - Evidence from Administrative Data," Ruhr Economic Papers 0470, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
    12. David Bardey & Luigi Siciliani, 2021. "Nursing‐homes' competition and distributional implications when the market is two‐sided," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 472-500, May.
    13. Herr, A. & Saric, A., 2016. "The Welfare Effects of Single Rooms in German Nursing Homes: A Structural Approach," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 16/23, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    14. Tatyana Koreshkova & Minjoon Lee, 2020. "Nursing Homes in Equilibrium: Implications for Long-term Care Policies," Working Papers wp414, University of Michigan, Michigan Retirement Research Center.
    15. Amitabh Chandra & Courtney Coile & Corina Mommaerts, 2023. "What Can Economics Say about Alzheimer's Disease?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 61(2), pages 428-470, June.
    16. Haizhen Lin, 2015. "Quality Choice And Market Structure: A Dynamic Analysis Of Nursing Home Oligopolies," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 56(4), pages 1261-1290, November.
    17. Johannes S. Kunz & Carol Propper & Kevin E. Staub & Rainer Winkelmann, 2023. "Assessing the Quality of Public Services: For-profits, Chains, and Concentration in the Hospital Market," Papers 2023-01, Centre for Health Economics, Monash University.
    18. Foster, Andrew D. & Lee, Yong Suk, 2015. "Staffing subsidies and the quality of care in nursing homes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 133-147.
    19. Ferran Espuny Pujol & Ruth Hancock & Morten Hviid & Marcello Morciano & Stephen Pudney, 2021. "Market concentration, supply, quality and prices paid by local authorities in the English care home market," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(8), pages 1886-1909, August.
    20. Rajendra Dulal, 2018. "Technical efficiency of nursing homes: do five-star quality ratings matter?," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 393-400, September.
    21. Chalkley, Martin & McVicar, Duncan, 2008. "Choice of contracts in the British National Health Service: An empirical study," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 1155-1167, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:hepoli:v:127:y:2023:i:c:p:60-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/healthpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.