IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/foreco/v17y2011i3p319-334.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic analysis of exploitation and regeneration in plantations with problematic site productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Halbritter, Andreas
  • Deegen, Peter

Abstract

Although intensive managed plantations clearly increase the growth and yield of forests several papers refer to declining forest productivity. Therefore in this paper we study the impact of declining forest productivity on the land expectation value and the optimal rotation length. We start from the research by Lu and Chang (1996) and try to fill the gap between the stable site productivity (âbestâ) and the site mining (âworstâ) cases. For that we extend the classical Faustmann model by availability of different recovering technologies. In general the model allows the analysis of the two plantation groups: âmining the site by high productive plantation followed by management of degraded areasâ and âhigh productive plantation and regeneration cyclingâ with the same comparative static. The model, analysis and comparison with the two extreme cases in Lu and Chang (1996) leads to a detailed understanding of land use management when site productivity decline is possible. Particularly the relation between declining periods with intensive land use and land use alternatives after declining periods with regeneration can be well understood. Findings are: Not ever declining process asks for regeneration. Many declining processes can be stopped at early times by high cash flows after mining periods. Shortenings of the regeneration time can boost site mining intensities.

Suggested Citation

  • Halbritter, Andreas & Deegen, Peter, 2011. "Economic analysis of exploitation and regeneration in plantations with problematic site productivity," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 319-334, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:foreco:v:17:y:2011:i:3:p:319-334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1104689911000055
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sedjo, Roger, 1999. "Biotechnology and Planted Forests: Assessment of Potential and Possibilities," RFF Working Paper Series dp-00-06, Resources for the Future.
    2. Sedjo, Roger A., 1999. "Biotechnology and Planted Forests: Assessment of Potential and Possibilities," Discussion Papers 10862, Resources for the Future.
    3. Chang, Sun Joseph & Gadow, Klaus V., 2010. "Application of the generalized Faustmann model to uneven-aged forest management," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(4), pages 313-325, December.
    4. David H. Newman & Charles B. Gilbert & William F. Hyde, 1985. "The Optimal Forest Rotation with Evolving Prices," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 64(4), pages 347-353.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Halbritter, Andreas & Deegen, Peter, 2015. "A combined economic analysis of optimal planting density, thinning and rotation for an even-aged forest stand," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 38-46.
    2. Deegen, Peter & Halbritter, Andreas, 2018. "The pure market allocation of land between forestry and agriculture," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 122-131.
    3. Zhang, Daowei & Stenger, Anne & Harou, Patrice A., 2015. "Policy instruments for developing planted forests: Theory and practices in China, the U.S., Brazil, and France," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 223-237.
    4. Coordes, Renke, 2016. "The emergence of forest age structures as determined by uneven-aged stands and age class forests," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 160-179.
    5. Khan, M. Ali, 2016. "On a forest as a commodity and on commodification in the discipline of forestry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 7-17.
    6. Chang, Sun Joseph, 2020. "Twenty one years after the publication of the generalized Faustmann formula," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sedjo, Roger A., 2004. "Transgenic Trees: Implementation and Outcomes of the Plant Protection Act," Discussion Papers 10629, Resources for the Future.
    2. Ben Abdallah, Skander & Lasserre, Pierre, 2017. "Forest land value and rotation with an alternative land use," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 118-127.
    3. Das, Gouranga Gopal & Alavalapati, Janaki, 2001. "Trade-mediated biotechnology transfer and its effective absorption: an application to the U.S. forestry sector," MPRA Paper 37254, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Feb 2002.
    4. Ben Abdallah, Skander & Lasserre, Pierre, 2016. "Asset retirement with infinitely repeated alternative replacements: Harvest age and species choice in forestry," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 144-164.
    5. Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Nghiem, Nhung, 2016. "Optimal forest rotation for carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation by farm income levels," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 185-194.
    6. Tahvonen, Olli, 2016. "Economics of rotation and thinning revisited: the optimality of clearcuts versus continuous cover forestry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 88-94.
    7. Rakotoarison, Hanitra & Loisel, Patrice, 2016. "The Faustmann model under storm risk and price uncertainty: A case study of European beech in Northwestern France," MPRA Paper 85114, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Newman, D.H., 2002. "Forestry's golden rule and the development of the optimal forest rotation literature," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 5-27.
    9. Honkaniemi, Juha & Ahtikoski, Anssi & Piri, Tuula, 2019. "Financial incentives to perform stump treatment against Heterobasidion root rot in Norway spruce dominated forests, the case of Finland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 1-9.
    10. Sedjo, Roger & Sohngen, Brent, 1996. "A Comparison of Timber Models for Use in Public Policy Analysis," RFF Working Paper Series dp-96-12, Resources for the Future.
    11. Chang, Sun Joseph, 2018. "Forest property taxation under the generalized Faustmann formula," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 38-45.
    12. Roessiger, Joerg & Griess, Verena C. & Härtl, Fabian & Clasen, Christian & Knoke, Thomas, 2013. "How economic performance of a stand increases due to decreased failure risk associated with the admixing of species," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 255(C), pages 58-69.
    13. Lien, G. & Stordal, S. & Hardaker, J.B. & Asheim, L.J., 2007. "Risk aversion and optimal forest replanting: A stochastic efficiency study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1584-1592, September.
    14. Susaeta, Andres & Chang, Sun Joseph & Carter, Douglas R. & Lal, Pankaj, 2014. "Economics of carbon sequestration under fluctuating economic environment, forest management and technological changes: An application to forest stands in the southern United States," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 47-64.
    15. Cunha-e-Sá, Maria A. & Rosa, Renato & Costa-Duarte, Clara, 2013. "Natural carbon capture and storage (NCCS): Forests, land use and carbon accounting," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 148-170.
    16. Skander BEN ABDALLAH & Pierre LASSERRE, 2015. "Optimum Forest Rotations of Alternative Tree Species," Cahiers de recherche 06-2015, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
    17. Petri P. Kärenlampi, 2018. "Stationary Forestry with Human Interference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    18. Gan, Jianbang & Kolison, Stephen H. & Colletti, Joe P., 2001. "Optimal forest stock and harvest with valuing non-timber benefits: a case of US coniferous forests," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 167-178, June.
    19. Sylvain Caurla & Antonello Lobianco, 2020. "Estimating climate service value in forestry : The case of climate information on drought for maritime pine in Southwestern France," Post-Print hal-03639335, HAL.
    20. Chang, Sun Joseph & Deegen, Peter, 2011. "Pressler's indicator rate formula as a guide for forest management," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 258-266, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:foreco:v:17:y:2011:i:3:p:319-334. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/701775/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.