IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/foreco/v10y2005i4p161-188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An engineering economics approach to the estimation of forest fuel supply in North-Trøndelag county, Norway

Author

Listed:
  • Bjørnstad, Even

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Bjørnstad, Even, 2005. "An engineering economics approach to the estimation of forest fuel supply in North-Trøndelag county, Norway," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 161-188, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:foreco:v:10:y:2005:i:4:p:161-188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1104-6899(04)00045-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marsden, James R & Pingry, David E, 1986. "Engineering Production Functions and the Testing of Quantitative Economic Hypotheses," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 53(212), pages 533-534, November.
    2. Smith, V Kerry, 1986. "Another View of the State of Engineering Production Functions," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 53(212), pages 529-532, November.
    3. Wibe, Soren A, 1984. "Engineering Production Functions: A Survey," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 51(204), pages 401-411, November.
    4. Hollis B. Chenery, 1949. "Engineering Production Functions," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 63(4), pages 507-531.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emili GRIFELL‐TATJÉ & Kristiaan KERSTENS, 2008. "Incentive Regulation And The Role Of Convexity In Benchmarking Electricity Distribution: Economists Versus Engineers," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(2), pages 227-248, June.
    2. Junius, Karsten, 1997. "Economies of scale: A survey of the empirical literature," Kiel Working Papers 813, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Christophe Combemale & Kate S Whitefoot & Laurence Ales & Erica R H Fuchs, 2021. "Not all technological change is equal: how the separability of tasks mediates the effect of technology change on skill demand [Patterns of industrial innovation]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(6), pages 1361-1387.
    4. James Bessen, 2009. "More Machines, Better Machines...Or Better Workers?," Working Papers 0803, Research on Innovation.
    5. Iansiti, Marco, 1997. "From technological potential to product performance: an empirical analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 345-365, October.
    6. Blackwell, Melanie & Pagoulatos, Angelos, 1990. "Measuring the Specification Bias of the Cobb Douglas Functional Form for Alfalfa Production," Agricultural Economics Research Reports 140070, University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    7. S K Mishra, 2010. "A Brief History of Production Functions," The IUP Journal of Managerial Economics, IUP Publications, vol. 0(4), pages 6-34, November.
    8. David, Laurent & Le Breton, Michel & Merillon, Olivier, 2007. "Kolm as a Contributor to Public Utility Pricing, Second Best Culture and the Theory of Regulation," IDEI Working Papers 490, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
    9. Mark Müser & Harald Dyckhoff, 2017. "Quality splitting in waste incineration due to non-convex production possibilities," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 73-96, January.
    10. Wibe, Soren, 2004. "Engineering and economic laws of production," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(3), pages 203-206, December.
    11. Wibe, Sören, 2008. "Efficiency: A dynamic approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 86-91, September.
    12. Taran Fæhn & Elisabeth Thuestad Isaksen, 2014. "Diffusion of climate technologies in the presence of commitment problems," Discussion Papers 768, Statistics Norway, Research Department.
    13. Alok Bhargava, 2006. "Modelling the Health of Filipino Children," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Econometrics, Statistics And Computational Approaches In Food And Health Sciences, chapter 11, pages 153-168, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    14. repec:cty:dpaper:10.1080/0013791x.2011.573615 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Åke E. Andersson & Börje Johansson, 2018. "Inside and outside the black box: organization of interdependencies," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(3), pages 501-516, November.
    16. Jürgen Bitzer & Erkan Gören, 2016. "Measuring capital services by energy use: an empirical comparative study," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(53), pages 5152-5167, November.
    17. Carmen Vicien, 1991. "Les modèles de simulation comme fonctions de production," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 204(1), pages 46-50.
    18. Flichman, Guillermo & Jacquet, Florence, 2003. "Le couplage des modèles agronomiques et économiques : intérêt pour l'analyse des politiques," Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 67.
    19. Sickles, Robin C. & Streitwieser, Mary L., 1989. "Technical Inefficiency And Productive Decline In The U.S. Interstate Natural Gas Pipline Industry Under The Natural Gas Policy Act," Working Papers 89-20, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.
    20. Massol, O., 2011. "A cost function for the natural gas transmission industry: further considerations," Working Papers 1464, Department of Economics, City University London.
    21. Bhargava, Alok, 1997. "Editor's introduction: Analysis of data on health," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 1-4, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bioenergy Costs Forestry Harvesting;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:foreco:v:10:y:2005:i:4:p:161-188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/701775/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.