IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v22y2004i1p110-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Core Intangible Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Carmeli, Abraham

Abstract

This study aims at introducing a framework by which scholars and practitioners may investigate a firm's profile of resources. The framework, labeled as 'Strategic Analysis Technique' (SAT), is an endeavor to better understand the firms' core resources (i.e., most valuable, rare, inimitable and non-substitutable) that generate sustainable competitive advantage and lead to superior performance. The resource profile of growing public firms in Israel was examined and compared with slow-growing firms. The results of this examination illustrated the framework. The study also sheds light on one of the most difficult challenges that resource-based strategists face -- understanding the drivers of sustainable competitive advantage.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmeli, Abraham, 2004. "Assessing Core Intangible Resources," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 110-122, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:22:y:2004:i:1:p:110-122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237303001580
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vanderstraeten, Johanna & van Witteloostuijn, Arjen & Matthyssens, Paul, 2020. "Organizational sponsorship and service co-development: A contingency view on service co-development directiveness of business incubators," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    2. Krzakiewicz Kazimierz & Cyfert Szymon, 2017. "Dynamic capabilities in strategic choice processes within organisations," Management, Sciendo, vol. 21(1), pages 7-19, May.
    3. García-Villaverde, Pedro M. & Ruiz-Ortega, María J. & Ignacio Canales, J., 2013. "Entrepreneurial orientation and the threat of imitation: The influence of upstream and downstream capabilities," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 263-277.
    4. Doyeon Won & Packianathan Chelladurai, 2016. "Competitive Advantage in Intercollegiate Athletics: Role of Intangible Resources," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Greco, Marco & Cricelli, Livio & Grimaldi, Michele, 2013. "A strategic management framework of tangible and intangible assets," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 55-66.
    6. Mariia A. Molodchik & Carlos Jardon & Angel Barajas, 2015. "The Firm Size Effect On Performance Due To Intangible Resources," HSE Working papers WP BRP 35/MAN/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    7. Voola, Ranjit & Casimir, Gian & Carlson, Jamie & Anushree Agnihotri, M., 2012. "The effects of market orientation, technological opportunism, and e-business adoption on performance: A moderated mediation analysis," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 136-146.
    8. Comi, Alice & Eppler, Martin J., 2014. "Diagnosing capabilities in family firms: An overview of visual research methods and suggestions for future applications," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 41-51.
    9. Camelia Oprean-Stan & Sebastian Stan & Vasile Brătian, 2020. "Corporate Sustainability and Intangible Resources Binomial: New Proposal on Intangible Resources Recognition and Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    10. Rossi, Cesare & Cricelli, Livio & Grimaldi, Michele & Greco, Marco, 2016. "The strategic assessment of intellectual capital assets: An application within Terradue Srl," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 1598-1603.
    11. Marie CARPENTER & Nabyla DAIDJ & Christina MORENO, 2014. "Game Console Manufacturers: the End of Sustainable Competitive Advantage?," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(94), pages 39-60, 2nd quart.
    12. Danijela Madžar & Ines Milohnic & Ivan Madžar, 2021. "Differences in the Implications of Organizational Creativity Regarding the Size of Enterprises in the Tourism Sector: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 14(2), pages 217-226.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:22:y:2004:i:1:p:110-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.