IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v32y2009i2p109-118.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing a new system to measure outcomes in a service coordination program for youth with severe emotional disturbance

Author

Listed:
  • Shannon, Lisa M.
  • Walker, Robert
  • Blevins, Michele

Abstract

This paper presents information on re-developing an outcome evaluation for a state-funded program providing service coordination utilizing wraparound to youth with severe emotional disturbance (SED) and their families. Originally funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the Kentucky IMPACT program has existed statewide since 1990. Changing data needs and limitations of the original evaluation required revamping the program's data collection system. The new evaluation uses the extant knowledge base to improve: (1) design, (2) measures, and (3) utility. A pre-post design with multiple follow-ups provides the framework for data collection. An ecological framework provides a conceptual structure for selecting measures focusing on both the service recipients and their environment. Data collection via a personal digital assistant (PDA) ensures utility of the data for both consumers and researchers. Issues ranging from conceptualization to implementation of the project as well as lessons learned are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Shannon, Lisa M. & Walker, Robert & Blevins, Michele, 2009. "Developing a new system to measure outcomes in a service coordination program for youth with severe emotional disturbance," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 109-118, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:32:y:2009:i:2:p:109-118
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149-7189(08)00075-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hodges, Sharon P. & Hernandez, Mario, 1999. "How organizational culture influences outcome information utilization," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 183-197, May.
    2. Jensen, Eric W. & James, Sherman A. & Boyce, W. Thomas & Hartnett, Sue A., 1983. "The family routines inventory: Development and validation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 201-211, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rieckmann, Traci R. & Kovas, Anne E. & Cassidy, Elaine F. & McCarty, Dennis, 2011. "Employing policy and purchasing levers to increase the use of evidence-based practices in community-based substance abuse treatment settings: Reports from single state authorities," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 366-374, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Yuerong & Merritt, Darcey H., 2021. "Family routines and child problem behaviors in fragile families: The role of social demographic and contextual factors," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    2. repec:pri:crcwel:wp10-16-ff is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Kling, Jeffrey & Liebman, Jeffrey, 2004. "Experimental Analysis of Neighborhood Effects on Youth," Working Paper Series rwp04-034, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    4. Kathleen Roche & Nan Astone & David Bishai, 2007. "Out-Of-School Care and Youth Problem Behaviors in Low-Income, Urban Areas," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 471-488, September.
    5. repec:pri:indrel:dsp01m613mx58m is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Valérie Pattyn & Marjolein Bouterse, 2020. "Explaining use and non-use of policy evaluations in a mature evaluation setting," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-9, December.
    7. Carl J. Dunst, 2023. "Meta-Analyses of the Relationships between Family Systems Practices, Parents’ Psychological Health, and Parenting Quality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(18), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Jordahl, Tina & Lohman, Brenda J., 2009. "A bioecological analysis of risk and protective factors associated with early sexual intercourse of young adolescents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1272-1282, December.
    9. Claire M. Kamp Dush, 2010. "Sliding Out? Cohabitation Dissolution in Low-Income Families," Working Papers 1279, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing..
    10. Bill Irwin & Paul G. St-Pierre, 2014. "Creating a Culture of Meaningful Evaluation in Public Libraries," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, December.
    11. Schalock, Robert L. & Bonham, Gordon S., 2003. "Measuring outcomes and managing for results," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 229-235, August.
    12. Coley, Rebekah Levine & Lohman, Brenda J. & Votruba-Drzal, Elizabeth & Pittman, Laura D. & Chase-Lansdale, P. Lindsay, 2007. "Maternal functioning, time, and money: The world of work and welfare," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 721-741, June.
    13. Jacopo Torriti, 2022. "Household electricity demand, the intrinsic flexibility index and UK wholesale electricity market prices," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 24(1), pages 7-27, January.
    14. Chase-Lansdale, P. Lindsay & Cherlin, Andrew J. & Guttmannova, Katarina & Fomby, Paula & Ribar, David C. & Coley, Rebekah Levine, 2011. "Long-term implications of welfare reform for the development of adolescents and young adults," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 678-688, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:32:y:2009:i:2:p:109-118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.