IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v32y2007i10p1855-1870.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical validation of the daylighting algorithms and associated interactions in building energy simulation programs using various shading devices and windows

Author

Listed:
  • Loutzenhiser, Peter G.
  • Maxwell, Gregory M.
  • Manz, Heinrich

Abstract

Empirical validation of building energy simulation programs is an important technique in examining the effectiveness and accuracies of implemented algorithms. In recent years, daylighting algorithms incorporated in building energy simulation programs have become increasingly sophisticated in their abilities to predict the illuminance, light power reductions, and the associated thermal load interactions. The focus of this study was to examine measured and simulated light levels in an actual building constructed for research purposes. Daylighting models were constructed in EnergyPlus and DOE-2.1E and the predicted illuminance and light power were compared with measurements; an assessment of heating and cooling interactions using a variable-air-volume reheat (VAVRH) system was also performed by analyzing reheat coil powers for the VAV boxes. The average differences from EnergyPlus for reference point daylight illuminance, light power, and reheat coil power predictions were within 119.2%, 16.9%, and 17.3%, respectively. DOE-2.1E predicted reference point daylight illuminances were within 114.1%, light powers were within 26.3%, and reheat coil power were within 25.4%.

Suggested Citation

  • Loutzenhiser, Peter G. & Maxwell, Gregory M. & Manz, Heinrich, 2007. "An empirical validation of the daylighting algorithms and associated interactions in building energy simulation programs using various shading devices and windows," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 1855-1870.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:32:y:2007:i:10:p:1855-1870
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2007.02.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544207000369
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2007.02.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, D.H.W. & Lam, J.C. & Wong, S.L., 2005. "Daylighting and its effects on peak load determination," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(10), pages 1817-1831.
    2. Johnsen, Kjeld, 1998. "Daylight in buildings, collaborative research in the International Energy Agency (IEA Task 21)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 142-150.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Danny H.W. & Lam, Tony N.T. & Chan, Wilco W.H. & Mak, Ada H.L., 2009. "Energy and cost analysis of semi-transparent photovoltaic in office buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(5), pages 722-729, May.
    2. Alrubaih, M.S. & Zain, M.F.M. & Alghoul, M.A. & Ibrahim, N.L.N. & Shameri, M.A. & Elayeb, Omkalthum, 2013. "Research and development on aspects of daylighting fundamentals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 494-505.
    3. Li, Danny H.W. & Lam, Tony N.T. & Wong, S.L. & Tsang, Ernest K.W., 2008. "Lighting and cooling energy consumption in an open-plan office using solar film coating," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1288-1297.
    4. Ma, Zhenjun & Wang, Shengwei, 2009. "Building energy research in Hong Kong: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(8), pages 1870-1883, October.
    5. Li, Danny H.W. & Lou, Siwei & Lam, Joseph C. & Wu, Ronald H.T., 2016. "Determining solar irradiance on inclined planes from classified CIE (International Commission on Illumination) standard skies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 462-470.
    6. Yu, Xu & Su, Yuehong, 2015. "Daylight availability assessment and its potential energy saving estimation –A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 494-503.
    7. Li, Danny H.W., 2010. "A review of daylight illuminance determinations and energy implications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(7), pages 2109-2118, July.
    8. Karasu, Servet, 2010. "The effect of daylight saving time options on electricity consumption of Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 3773-3782.
    9. Sadineni, Suresh B. & Boehm, Robert F., 2012. "Measurements and simulations for peak electrical load reduction in cooling dominated climate," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 689-697.
    10. Li, Danny H.W. & Wong, S.L., 2007. "Daylighting and energy implications due to shading effects from nearby buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(12), pages 1199-1209, December.
    11. Chi, Fang'ai & Wang, Ruonan & Li, Gaomei & Xu, Liming & Wang, Yonghe & Peng, Changhai, 2020. "Integration of sun-tracking shading panels into window system towards maximum energy saving and non-glare daylighting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    12. Sadineni, Suresh B. & Atallah, Fady & Boehm, Robert F., 2012. "Impact of roof integrated PV orientation on the residential electricity peak demand," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 204-210.
    13. Li, Danny H.W. & Chau, Natalie T.C. & Wan, Kevin K.W., 2013. "Predicting daylight illuminance and solar irradiance on vertical surfaces based on classified standard skies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 252-258.
    14. Li, Danny H.W. & Lam, Tony N.T. & Cheung, K.L. & Tang, H.L., 2008. "An analysis of luminous efficacies under the CIE standard skies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 2357-2365.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:32:y:2007:i:10:p:1855-1870. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.