IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v28y2003i1p27-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance evaluation of a single-flash geothermal power plant in Denizli, Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Cerci, Y.

Abstract

The performance of an 11.4 MW single-flash geothermal power plant in Denizli, Turkey, along with major plant components, was evaluated by using exergy analysis based on actual plant operation data. The geothermal power plant operation is described by following the flow of the geofluid, and the exergies of the geofluid at major plant locations are calculated and presented in tables. Exergy destruction from the wellhead to the discharge of steam is quantified and illustrated using an exergy flow diagram. Major exergy destructions occurred due to the separation of steam from the geofluid, the discharge of the brine from the separator, turbine, generator and compressor inefficiencies, and the discharge of steam to the environment. The largest exergy destruction occurred during the discharge of the brine into the Menderes river. This amounted to 46.9% of the total energy input. The second law efficiency of the plant was calculated to be 20.8%. The comparison of the efficiency with other geothermal power plants revealed that the plant efficiency is low, and therefore alternative designs were investigated to improve its performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Cerci, Y., 2003. "Performance evaluation of a single-flash geothermal power plant in Denizli, Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 27-35.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:28:y:2003:i:1:p:27-35
    DOI: 10.1016/S0360-5442(02)00093-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544202000932
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0360-5442(02)00093-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tekin, Taner & Bayramoǧlu, Mahmut, 2001. "Exergy and structural analysis of raw juice production and steam-power units of a sugar production plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 287-297.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Jiangfeng & Dai, Yiping & Gao, Lin, 2009. "Exergy analyses and parametric optimizations for different cogeneration power plants in cement industry," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(6), pages 941-948, June.
    2. Hepbasli, Arif, 2008. "A key review on exergetic analysis and assessment of renewable energy resources for a sustainable future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 593-661, April.
    3. Luo, Chao & Huang, Lichang & Gong, Yulie & Ma, Weibin, 2012. "Thermodynamic comparison of different types of geothermal power plant systems and case studies in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 155-160.
    4. Rašković, Predrag & Guzović, Zvonimir & Cvetković, Svetislav, 2013. "Performance analysis of electricity generation by the medium temperature geothermal resources: Velika Ciglena case study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-31.
    5. Nian, Yong-Le & Cheng, Wen-Long, 2018. "Insights into geothermal utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 44-60.
    6. Ganjehsarabi, Hadi & Gungor, Ali & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2012. "Exergetic performance analysis of Dora II geothermal power plant in Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 101-108.
    7. Keçebaş, Ali & Gökgedik, Harun, 2015. "Thermodynamic evaluation of a geothermal power plant for advanced exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 746-755.
    8. Kaiyong Hu & Jialing Zhu & Wei Zhang & Xinli Lu, 2016. "A Selection Method for Power Generation Plants Used for Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, July.
    9. Gökgedik, Harun & Yürüsoy, Muhammet & Keçebaş, Ali, 2016. "Improvement potential of a real geothermal power plant using advanced exergy analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 254-263.
    10. Davis, Adelina P. & Michaelides, Efstathios E., 2009. "Geothermal power production from abandoned oil wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(7), pages 866-872.
    11. Ozgener, Leyla & Hepbasli, Arif & Dincer, Ibrahim, 2007. "A key review on performance improvement aspects of geothermal district heating systems and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(8), pages 1675-1697, October.
    12. Hepbasli, Arif & Ozgener, Leyla, 2004. "Development of geothermal energy utilization in Turkey: a review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 8(5), pages 433-460, October.
    13. Li, Hongyang & Rane, Sham & Yu, Zhibin, 2021. "Investigation of the performance and flow characteristics of two-phase reaction turbines in total flow geothermal systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 345-372.
    14. Vaccari, Marco & Pannocchia, Gabriele & Tognotti, Leonardo & Paci, Marco & Bonciani, Roberto, 2020. "A rigorous simulation model of geothermal power plants for emission control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    15. Etemoglu, A.B. & Can, M., 2007. "Classification of geothermal resources in Turkey by exergy analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(7), pages 1596-1606, September.
    16. Unverdi, Murat & Cerci, Yunus, 2013. "Performance analysis of Germencik Geothermal Power Plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 192-200.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chauhan, Manish Kumar & Varun & Chaudhary, Sachin & Kumar, Suneel & Samar, 2011. "Life cycle assessment of sugar industry: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(7), pages 3445-3453, September.
    2. Dogbe, Eunice Sefakor & Mandegari, Mohsen A. & Görgens, Johann F., 2018. "Exergetic diagnosis and performance analysis of a typical sugar mill based on Aspen Plus® simulation of the process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 614-625.
    3. Ensinas, A.V. & Modesto, M. & Nebra, S.A. & Serra, L., 2009. "Reduction of irreversibility generation in sugar and ethanol production from sugarcane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 680-688.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:28:y:2003:i:1:p:27-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.