IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v21y1996i2p77-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative assessment of the energy and carbon balance of utilizing straw

Author

Listed:
  • Horne, Ralph E.
  • Mortimer, Nigel D.
  • Hetherington, Robert
  • Grant, John F.

Abstract

There has been a recent growth of interest in the potential for using straw as an energy source to generate electricity and/or heat. The energy balance of this process is important as a measure of the sustainability of such an activity, while the CO2 emitted and that saved by offsetting the need to produce energy by other means are also important, given the U.K.'s obligations to reduce CO2 emissions. An existing methodology is adopted to calculate estimates of primary energy inputs and CO2 outputs. Results of calculations are presented and considered in the context of their implications for potential uses of straw represented by four scenarios. One scenario is the use of straw as a fuel in commercial scale power only, heat only and combined heat and power (CHP) plants. Overall, CHP production provides the most favourable energy and CO2 balances. Results are compared with those for alternative uses or disposal methods for straw, represented by other scenarios, and with those for producing electricity and/or heat by conventional means. Conclusions are drawn concerning the contributions to the energy and carbon balances of using straw as a fuel and recommendations are made for further work.

Suggested Citation

  • Horne, Ralph E. & Mortimer, Nigel D. & Hetherington, Robert & Grant, John F., 1996. "A comparative assessment of the energy and carbon balance of utilizing straw," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 77-86.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:21:y:1996:i:2:p:77-86
    DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(95)00094-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0360544295000941
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/0360-5442(95)00094-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saaty, Thomas & Ma, Fred & Blair, Peter, 1977. "Operational gaming for energy policy analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 63-75, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sebastián, F. & Royo, J. & Gómez, M., 2011. "Cofiring versus biomass-fired power plants: GHG (Greenhouse Gases) emissions savings comparison by means of LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 2029-2037.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zanakis, Stelios H. & Mandakovic, Tomislav & Gupta, Sushil K. & Sahay, Sundeep & Hong, Sungwan, 1995. "A review of program evaluation and fund allocation methods within the service and government sectors," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 59-79, March.
    2. Macías, Arturo & Matilla-García, Mariano, 2015. "Net energy analysis in a Ramsey–Hotelling growth model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 562-573.
    3. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Poh, K.L., 2006. "Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: An update," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(14), pages 2604-2622.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:21:y:1996:i:2:p:77-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.