IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v188y2019ics0360544219317724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comprehensive study on estimating higher heating value of biomass from proximate and ultimate analysis with machine learning approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Xing, Jiangkuan
  • Luo, Kun
  • Wang, Haiou
  • Gao, Zhengwei
  • Fan, Jianren

Abstract

Higher heating value (HHV) is an important parameter for design and operation of biomass-fueled energy systems. Experimental approach is always time-consuming and expensive for determinating this property compared with mathematical models. In this paper, three machine learning approaches, including artificial neural network (ANN), support vector machine (SVM) and random forest (RF), are employed for accurately estimating biomass HHV from ultimate or proximate analysis. The linear and nonlinear empirical correlations are also carried out for comparison. The results show machine learning approaches give better predictions (R2 > 0.90) compared with those of empirical correlations (R2 < 0.70), especially for the extreme values. The RF model shows the best performances for both the ultimate and proximate analysis, with the determination coefficient R2>0.94. The SVM and ANN approaches show similar performances with R2∼ 0.90. Ultimate-based models show better performances compared with those of the proximate-based models even with much less samples. Relative importance analysis shows for the proximate analysis, the ash, volatile matter and fixed carbon fractions show the maximum, medium and minimum effects, respectively. For the ultimate analysis, carbon and hydrogen fractions hold the first two significant places with carbon fraction having the most significant influence, while the oxygen and nitrogen fractions have limited effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing, Jiangkuan & Luo, Kun & Wang, Haiou & Gao, Zhengwei & Fan, Jianren, 2019. "A comprehensive study on estimating higher heating value of biomass from proximate and ultimate analysis with machine learning approaches," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:188:y:2019:i:c:s0360544219317724
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544219317724
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xing, Jiangkuan & Wang, Haiou & Luo, Kun & Wang, Shuai & Bai, Yun & Fan, Jianren, 2019. "Predictive single-step kinetic model of biomass devolatilization for CFD applications: A comparison study of empirical correlations (EC), artificial neural networks (ANN) and random forest (RF)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 104-114.
    2. Hosseinpour, Soleiman & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Mehrpooya, Mehdi, 2017. "Estimation of biomass higher heating value (HHV) based on the proximate analysis by using iterative neural network-adapted partial least squares (INNPLS)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 473-479.
    3. Goyal, H.B. & Seal, Diptendu & Saxena, R.C., 2008. "Bio-fuels from thermochemical conversion of renewable resources: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 504-517, February.
    4. Prins, Mark J. & Ptasinski, Krzysztof J. & Janssen, Frans J.J.G., 2007. "From coal to biomass gasification: Comparison of thermodynamic efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1248-1259.
    5. Mutlu, Ali Yener & Yucel, Ozgun, 2018. "An artificial intelligence based approach to predicting syngas composition for downdraft biomass gasification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PA), pages 895-901.
    6. Erol, M. & Haykiri-Acma, H. & Küçükbayrak, S., 2010. "Calorific value estimation of biomass from their proximate analyses data," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 170-173.
    7. De, S. & Kaiadi, M. & Fast, M. & Assadi, M., 2007. "Development of an artificial neural network model for the steam process of a coal biomass cofired combined heat and power (CHP) plant in Sweden," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(11), pages 2099-2109.
    8. Puig-Arnavat, Maria & Bruno, Joan Carles & Coronas, Alberto, 2010. "Review and analysis of biomass gasification models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2841-2851, December.
    9. Kasmuri, N.H. & Kamarudin, S.K. & Abdullah, S.R.S. & Hasan, H.A. & Som, A. Md, 2019. "Integrated advanced nonlinear neural network-simulink control system for production of bio-methanol from sugar cane bagasse via pyrolysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 261-272.
    10. Dhyani, Vaibhav & Bhaskar, Thallada, 2018. "A comprehensive review on the pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 695-716.
    11. Khodaei, Hassan & Al-Abdeli, Yasir M. & Guzzomi, Ferdinando & Yeoh, Guan H., 2015. "An overview of processes and considerations in the modelling of fixed-bed biomass combustion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 946-972.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Onsree, Thossaporn & Tippayawong, Nakorn & Phithakkitnukoon, Santi & Lauterbach, Jochen, 2022. "Interpretable machine-learning model with a collaborative game approach to predict yields and higher heating value of torrefied biomass," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    2. Shivangi Jha & Sonil Nanda & Bishnu Acharya & Ajay K. Dalai, 2022. "A Review of Thermochemical Conversion of Waste Biomass to Biofuels," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Sabarathinam Srinivasan & Suresh Kumarasamy & Zacharias E. Andreadakis & Pedro G. Lind, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence and Mathematical Models of Power Grids Driven by Renewable Energy Sources: A Survey," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-56, July.
    4. Ivan Brandić & Alan Antonović & Lato Pezo & Božidar Matin & Tajana Krička & Vanja Jurišić & Karlo Špelić & Mislav Kontek & Juraj Kukuruzović & Mateja Grubor & Ana Matin, 2023. "Energy Potentials of Agricultural Biomass and the Possibility of Modelling Using RFR and SVM Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-10, January.
    5. Büyükkanber, Kaan & Haykiri-Acma, Hanzade & Yaman, Serdar, 2023. "Calorific value prediction of coal and its optimization by machine learning based on limited samples in a wide range," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    6. Kim, Jun Young & Kim, Dongjae & Li, Zezhong John & Dariva, Claudio & Cao, Yankai & Ellis, Naoko, 2023. "Predicting and optimizing syngas production from fluidized bed biomass gasifiers: A machine learning approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    7. Yang, Shiliang & Dong, Ruihan & Du, Yanxiang & Wang, Shuai & Wang, Hua, 2021. "Numerical study of the biomass pyrolysis process in a spouted bed reactor through computational fluid dynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    8. Anna Matveeva & Aleksey Bychkov, 2022. "How to Train an Artificial Neural Network to Predict Higher Heating Values of Biofuel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-13, September.
    9. Łukasz Sobol & Karol Wolski & Adam Radkowski & Elżbieta Piwowarczyk & Maciej Jurkowski & Henryk Bujak & Arkadiusz Dyjakon, 2022. "Determination of Energy Parameters and Their Variability between Varieties of Fodder and Turf Grasses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Ivan Brandić & Lato Pezo & Nikola Bilandžija & Anamarija Peter & Jona Šurić & Neven Voća, 2023. "Comparison of Different Machine Learning Models for Modelling the Higher Heating Value of Biomass," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Yang, Ke & Wu, Kai & Zhang, Huiyan, 2022. "Machine learning prediction of the yield and oxygen content of bio-oil via biomass characteristics and pyrolysis conditions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    12. Kartal, Furkan & Özveren, Uğur, 2022. "Prediction of torrefied biomass properties from raw biomass," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 578-591.
    13. Inioluwa Christianah Afolabi & Emmanuel I. Epelle & Burcu Gunes & Fatih Güleç & Jude A. Okolie, 2022. "Data-Driven Machine Learning Approach for Predicting the Higher Heating Value of Different Biomass Classes," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-15, November.
    14. Chen, Xiaoling & Zhang, Yongxing & Xu, Baoshen & Li, Yifan, 2022. "A simple model for estimation of higher heating value of oily sludge," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ascher, Simon & Watson, Ian & You, Siming, 2022. "Machine learning methods for modelling the gasification and pyrolysis of biomass and waste," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Ramos, Ana & Monteiro, Eliseu & Rouboa, Abel, 2019. "Numerical approaches and comprehensive models for gasification process: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 188-206.
    3. Loha, Chanchal & Chattopadhyay, Himadri & Chatterjee, Pradip K., 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of hydrogen rich synthetic gas generation from fluidized bed gasification of rice husk," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 4063-4071.
    4. Zang, Guiyan & Zhang, Jianan & Jia, Junxi & Lora, Electo Silva & Ratner, Albert, 2020. "Life cycle assessment of power-generation systems based on biomass integrated gasification combined cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 336-346.
    5. Kim, Jun Young & Kim, Dongjae & Li, Zezhong John & Dariva, Claudio & Cao, Yankai & Ellis, Naoko, 2023. "Predicting and optimizing syngas production from fluidized bed biomass gasifiers: A machine learning approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).
    6. Ngo, Son Ich & Nguyen, Thanh D.B. & Lim, Young-Il & Song, Byung-Ho & Lee, Uen-Do & Choi, Young-Tai & Song, Jae-Hun, 2011. "Performance evaluation for dual circulating fluidized-bed steam gasifier of biomass using quasi-equilibrium three-stage gasification model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(12), pages 5208-5220.
    7. Kambo, Harpreet Singh & Dutta, Animesh, 2015. "A comparative review of biochar and hydrochar in terms of production, physico-chemical properties and applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 359-378.
    8. Xing, Jiangkuan & Wang, Haiou & Luo, Kun & Wang, Shuai & Bai, Yun & Fan, Jianren, 2019. "Predictive single-step kinetic model of biomass devolatilization for CFD applications: A comparison study of empirical correlations (EC), artificial neural networks (ANN) and random forest (RF)," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 104-114.
    9. La Villetta, M. & Costa, M. & Massarotti, N., 2017. "Modelling approaches to biomass gasification: A review with emphasis on the stoichiometric method," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 71-88.
    10. Sérgio Ferreira & Eliseu Monteiro & Paulo Brito & Cândida Vilarinho, 2019. "A Holistic Review on Biomass Gasification Modified Equilibrium Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-31, January.
    11. Bhoi, P.R. & Ouedraogo, A.S. & Soloiu, V. & Quirino, R., 2020. "Recent advances on catalysts for improving hydrocarbon compounds in bio-oil of biomass catalytic pyrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    12. Al-Rumaihi, Aisha & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Mckay, Gordon & Mackey, Hamish & Al-Ansari, Tareq, 2022. "A review of pyrolysis technologies and feedstock: A blending approach for plastic and biomass towards optimum biochar yield," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    13. Sukamal Sarkar & Milan Skalicky & Akbar Hossain & Marian Brestic & Saikat Saha & Sourav Garai & Krishnendu Ray & Koushik Brahmachari, 2020. "Management of Crop Residues for Improving Input Use Efficiency and Agricultural Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-24, November.
    14. Zhang, Bowei & Guo, Simao & Jin, Hui, 2022. "Production forecast analysis of BP neural network based on Yimin lignite supercritical water gasification experiment results," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    15. Büyükkanber, Kaan & Haykiri-Acma, Hanzade & Yaman, Serdar, 2023. "Calorific value prediction of coal and its optimization by machine learning based on limited samples in a wide range," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    16. Saidur, R. & BoroumandJazi, G. & Mekhilef, S. & Mohammed, H.A., 2012. "A review on exergy analysis of biomass based fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1217-1222.
    17. Mari Rowena C. Tanquilut & Homer C. Genuino & Erwin Wilbers & Rossana Marie C. Amongo & Delfin C. Suministrado & Kevin F. Yaptenco & Marilyn M. Elauria & Jessie C. Elauria & Hero J. Heeres, 2020. "Biorefining of Pigeon Pea: Residue Conversion by Pyrolysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    18. ABM Abdul Malek & M Hasanuzzaman & Nasrudin A Rahim & Yusuf A Al–Turki, 2021. "Energy, economic, and environmental analysis of 10-MW biomass gasification based power generation in Malaysia," Energy & Environment, , vol. 32(2), pages 295-337, March.
    19. Silva, Isabelly P. & Lima, Rafael M.A. & Silva, Gabriel F. & Ruzene, Denise S. & Silva, Daniel P., 2019. "Thermodynamic equilibrium model based on stoichiometric method for biomass gasification: A review of model modifications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    20. Escalante, Jamin & Chen, Wei-Hsin & Tabatabaei, Meisam & Hoang, Anh Tuan & Kwon, Eilhann E. & Andrew Lin, Kun-Yi & Saravanakumar, Ayyadurai, 2022. "Pyrolysis of lignocellulosic, algal, plastic, and other biomass wastes for biofuel production and circular bioeconomy: A review of thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:188:y:2019:i:c:s0360544219317724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.