IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v81y2019icp886-898.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When the carrot goes bad: The effect of solar rebate uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Tsvetanov, Tsvetan

Abstract

Although meant to encourage investment in solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, some incentive policies may themselves become a barrier in instances where policy-related uncertainty is present, as potential solar adopters delay their investment until uncertainty is resolved. This study utilizes a quasi-experimental setting to quantify the effect of solar policy uncertainty. Focusing on the California Solar Initiative's residential rebate program, I exploit the temporary exhaustion of funds within one of the utility territories as an exogenous source of increased uncertainty and estimate that it leads to a 67% drop in rebate applications in an average ZIP code-week. There is considerable heterogeneity in this effect depending on household income and PV system size. Among households that are least likely to invest in PV without a rebate incentive, program participation drops by up to 69%. This suggests potentially significant loss in program effectiveness due to lower PV adoption and underscores the importance of accounting for uncertainty in policy evaluations.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsvetanov, Tsvetan, 2019. "When the carrot goes bad: The effect of solar rebate uncertainty," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 886-898.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:81:y:2019:i:c:p:886-898
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.05.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988319301823
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.05.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gao, Xue & Zhou, Shan, 2022. "Solar adoption inequality in the U.S.: Trend, magnitude, and solar justice policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Energy policy; Uncertainty; Rebates; Renewable energy; Solar photovoltaic systems;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D04 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Policy: Formulation; Implementation; Evaluation
    • H31 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - Household
    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
    • Q48 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:81:y:2019:i:c:p:886-898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.