IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v107y2022ics0140988321006071.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market making and electricity price formation in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Kanamura, Takashi
  • Bunn, Derek W.

Abstract

Market-making, a common trading practice, is often directed by regulators to improve the liquidity in new products, to make their prices more reliable as markers and to encourage new entrants. Establishing its effectiveness is sometimes elusive, however, as market participation and behaviour can be confounded by many special circumstances, especially in energy. We develop an unusual model-based approach in order to establish if a market-making intervention improved the fundamental price formation dynamics. In the context of the Japanese wholesale electricity auction, we develop a dynamic regime switching formulation to account for the distinct effects of buy-side and sell-side volumes on price formation, using temperature as a regime switching driver. The model has a nonlinear functionality that allows it to fit the spiky time series very effectively. The result is clarity that after a market-making intervention in 2017, the buy and sell volumes had more intuitive and distinct effects upon price formation, compared to previously. In addition, temperature information has been more coherently embedded in price and volatility fundamental modelling since the intervention. We argue that the model indicated a more balanced market with buy and sell side regime drivers behaving more consistently with improved market efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Kanamura, Takashi & Bunn, Derek W., 2022. "Market making and electricity price formation in Japan," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:107:y:2022:i:c:s0140988321006071
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105765
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988321006071
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105765?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Markus Burger & Bernhard Klar & Alfred Muller & Gero Schindlmayr, 2004. "A spot market model for pricing derivatives in electricity markets," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 109-122.
    2. Xiaofei Lu & Frédéric Abergel, 2018. "High-dimensional Hawkes processes for limit order books: modelling, empirical analysis and numerical calibration," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 249-264, February.
    3. Marco Avellaneda & Sasha Stoikov, 2008. "High-frequency trading in a limit order book," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 217-224.
    4. Abergel,Frédéric & Anane,Marouane & Chakraborti,Anirban & Jedidi,Aymen & Muni Toke,Ioane, 2016. "Limit Order Books," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107163980.
    5. Nakajima, Tadahiro, 2013. "Inefficient and opaque price formation in the Japan Electric Power Exchange," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 329-334.
    6. Aitor Ciarreta & Peru Muniainy & Ainhoa Zarraga, 2017. "Modelling Realized Volatility in Electricity Spot Prices: New insights and Application to the Japanese Electricity Market," ISER Discussion Paper 0991, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    7. Ben Hambly & Sam Howison & Tino Kluge, 2009. "Modelling spikes and pricing swing options in electricity markets," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(8), pages 937-949.
    8. S. Moazeni & M. Coulon & I. Arciniegas Rueda & B. Song & W.B. Powell, 2016. "A non-parametric structural hybrid modeling approach for electricity prices," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 213-230, February.
    9. Claudia Kluppelberg & Thilo Meyer-Brandis & Andrea Schmidt, 2010. "Electricity spot price modelling with a view towards extreme spike risk," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(9), pages 963-974.
    10. Biondi, Yuri & Giannoccolo, Pierpaolo & Galam, Serge, 2012. "Formation of share market prices under heterogeneous beliefs and common knowledge," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(22), pages 5532-5545.
    11. Rudiger Kiesel & Gero Schindlmayr & Reik Borger, 2009. "A two-factor model for the electricity forward market," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(3), pages 279-287.
    12. Jun Maekawa & Koji Shimada, 2019. "A Speculative Trading Model for the Electricity Market: Based on Japan Electric Power Exchange," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, July.
    13. John R. Graham & Alok Kumar, 2006. "Do Dividend Clienteles Exist? Evidence on Dividend Preferences of Retail Investors," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 61(3), pages 1305-1336, June.
    14. Juri Hinz & Lutz Von Grafenstein & Michel Verschuere & Martina Wilhelm, 2005. "Pricing electricity risk by interest rate methods," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 49-60.
    15. Xiaofei Lu & Frédéric Abergel, 2018. "High dimensional Hawkes processes for limit order books Modelling, empirical analysis and numerical calibration," Post-Print hal-01686122, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Apergis, Nicholas & Pan, Wei-Fong & Reade, James & Wang, Shixuan, 2023. "Modelling Australian electricity prices using indicator saturation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    2. Rassi, Samin & Kanamura, Takashi, 2023. "Electricity price spike formation and LNG prices effect under gross bidding scheme in JEPX," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Deschatre, Thomas & Féron, Olivier & Gruet, Pierre, 2021. "A survey of electricity spot and futures price models for risk management applications," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Thomas Deschatre & Olivier F'eron & Pierre Gruet, 2021. "A survey of electricity spot and futures price models for risk management applications," Papers 2103.16918, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2021.
    3. Markus Hess, 2020. "Pricing electricity forwards under future information on the stochastic mean-reversion level," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 43(2), pages 751-767, December.
    4. Emmanouil Sfendourakis & Ioane Muni Toke, 2021. "LOB modeling using Hawkes processes with a state-dependent factor," Papers 2107.12872, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2021.
    5. Bruno Gav{s}perov & Zvonko Kostanjv{c}ar, 2022. "Deep Reinforcement Learning for Market Making Under a Hawkes Process-Based Limit Order Book Model," Papers 2207.09951, arXiv.org.
    6. Hess, Markus, 2017. "Modeling positive electricity prices with arithmetic jump-diffusions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 496-507.
    7. Ioane Muni Toke & Nakahiro Yoshida, 2020. "Marked point processes and intensity ratios for limit order book modeling," Papers 2001.08442, arXiv.org.
    8. Thomas Spooner & Rahul Savani, 2020. "Robust Market Making via Adversarial Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2003.01820, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    9. Shunya Chomei, 2023. "Empirical analysis in limit order book modeling for Nikkei 225 Stocks with Cox-type intensities," Papers 2302.01668, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    10. Olga Y. Uritskaya & Vadim M. Uritsky, 2015. "Predictability of price movements in deregulated electricity markets," Papers 1505.08117, arXiv.org.
    11. Cartea, Álvaro & González-Pedraz, Carlos, 2012. "How much should we pay for interconnecting electricity markets? A real options approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 14-30.
    12. Hain, Martin & Schermeyer, Hans & Uhrig-Homburg, Marliese & Fichtner, Wolf, 2017. "An Electricity Price Modeling Framework for Renewable-Dominant Markets," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 23, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    13. Timoth'ee Fabre & Ioane Muni Toke, 2024. "Neural Hawkes: Non-Parametric Estimation in High Dimension and Causality Analysis in Cryptocurrency Markets," Papers 2401.09361, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    14. Godin, Frédéric & Ibrahim, Zinatu, 2021. "An analysis of electricity congestion price patterns in North America," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    15. Rassi, Samin & Kanamura, Takashi, 2023. "Electricity price spike formation and LNG prices effect under gross bidding scheme in JEPX," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    16. Hai-Chuan Xu & Wei-Xing Zhou, 2020. "Modeling aggressive market order placements with Hawkes factor models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, January.
    17. Kramer, Anke & Kiesel, Rüdiger, 2021. "Exogenous factors for order arrivals on the intraday electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    18. Farshid Mehrdoust & Idin Noorani, 2023. "Valuation of Spark-Spread Option Written on Electricity and Gas Forward Contracts Under Two-Factor Models with Non-Gaussian Lévy Processes," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(2), pages 807-853, February.
    19. Coulon, Michael & Powell, Warren B. & Sircar, Ronnie, 2013. "A model for hedging load and price risk in the Texas electricity market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 976-988.
    20. Ana Roldan Contreras & Anatoliy Swishchuk, 2022. "Optimal Liquidation, Acquisition and Market Making Problems in HFT under Hawkes Models for LOB," Risks, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-32, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Market-makers; JEPX; Liquidity; Regime switching;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
    • Q41 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Demand and Supply; Prices
    • L94 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Electric Utilities

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:107:y:2022:i:c:s0140988321006071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.