IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v300y2022i2p405-417.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A reference set based many-objective co-evolutionary algorithm with an application to the knapsack problem

Author

Listed:
  • Sahinkoc, H. Mert
  • Bilge, Ümit

Abstract

Despite the growing interest on many-objective evolutionary algorithms, studies on combinatorial problems are still rare. In this study, we choose many-objective knapsack problem (MaOKP) as the benchmark and target the challenges imposed by many-objectives in discrete search spaces by investigating several reference set handling approaches and combining several prominent evolutionary strategies in an innovative fashion. Our proposed algorithm uses elitist nondominated sorting and reference set based sorting, however reference points are mapped onto a fixed hyperplane obtained at the beginning of the algorithm. All evolutionary mechanisms are designed in a way to complement the reference set based sorting. Reference point guided path relinking is proposed as the recombination scheme for this purpose. Repair and local improvement procedures are also guided by reference points. Moreover, the reference set co-evolves simultaneously with the solution set, using both cooperative and competitive interactions to balance diversity and convergence, and adapts to the topology of the Pareto front in a self-adaptive parametric way. Numerical experiments display the success of the proposed algorithm compared to state-of-art approaches and yield the best results for MaOKP. The findings are inspiring and encouraging for the use of co-evolutionary reference set based techniques for combinatorial optimization.

Suggested Citation

  • Sahinkoc, H. Mert & Bilge, Ümit, 2022. "A reference set based many-objective co-evolutionary algorithm with an application to the knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 405-417.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:300:y:2022:i:2:p:405-417
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.10.033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221721008833
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.10.033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sato, Hiroyuki & Aguirre, Hernan E. & Tanaka, Kiyoshi, 2007. "Local dominance and local recombination in MOEAs on 0/1 multiobjective knapsack problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1708-1723, September.
    2. Wang, Rui & Purshouse, Robin C. & Fleming, Peter J., 2015. "Preference-inspired co-evolutionary algorithms using weight vectors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(2), pages 423-441.
    3. Figueira, J.R. & Liefooghe, A. & Talbi, E.-G. & Wierzbicki, A.P., 2010. "A parallel multiple reference point approach for multi-objective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 390-400, September.
    4. Ishibuchi, Hisao & Narukawa, Kaname & Tsukamoto, Noritaka & Nojima, Yusuke, 2008. "An empirical study on similarity-based mating for evolutionary multiobjective combinatorial optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(1), pages 57-75, July.
    5. Goh, C.K. & Tan, K.C. & Liu, D.S. & Chiam, S.C., 2010. "A competitive and cooperative co-evolutionary approach to multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 42-54, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Yue & Zhang, Qi & Farnoosh, Arash & Chen, Siyuan & Li, Yan, 2019. "GIS-Based Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization of charging stations for electric vehicles," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 844-853.
    2. Jaszczur, Marek & Hassan, Qusay & Palej, Patryk & Abdulateef, Jasim, 2020. "Multi-Objective optimisation of a micro-grid hybrid power system for household application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    3. Gui Li & Gai-Ge Wang & Shan Wang, 2021. "Two-Population Coevolutionary Algorithm with Dynamic Learning Strategy for Many-Objective Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-34, February.
    4. Cem P. Cetinkaya & Mert Can Gunacti, 2018. "Multi-Criteria Analysis of Water Allocation Scenarios in a Water Scarce Basin," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(8), pages 2867-2884, June.
    5. Guozheng Li & Rui Wang & Tao Zhang & Mengjun Ming, 2018. "Multi-Objective Optimal Design of Renewable Energy Integrated CCHP System Using PICEA-g," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Derbel, Bilel & Humeau, Jérémie & Liefooghe, Arnaud & Verel, Sébastien, 2014. "Distributed localized bi-objective search," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 731-743.
    7. Liu, Ruochen & Li, Jianxia & fan, Jing & Mu, Caihong & Jiao, Licheng, 2017. "A coevolutionary technique based on multi-swarm particle swarm optimization for dynamic multi-objective optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 1028-1051.
    8. Mancini, Simona & Triki, Chefi & Piya, Sujan, 2022. "Optimal selection of touristic packages based on user preferences during sports mega-events," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 819-830.
    9. Mengjun Ming & Rui Wang & Yabing Zha & Tao Zhang, 2017. "Multi-Objective Optimization of Hybrid Renewable Energy System Using an Enhanced Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    10. Steuer, Ralph E. & Utz, Sebastian, 2023. "Non-contour efficient fronts for identifying most preferred portfolios in sustainability investing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 742-753.
    11. Qiang Yang & Yuanpeng Zhu & Xudong Gao & Dongdong Xu & Zhenyu Lu, 2022. "Elite Directed Particle Swarm Optimization with Historical Information for High-Dimensional Problems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-29, April.
    12. Li, Wei & Nault, Barrie R. & Ye, Honghan, 2019. "Trade-off balancing in scheduling for flow shop production and perioperative processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 817-830.
    13. Steven D. Silver, 2018. "Multivariate methodology for discriminating market segments in urban commuting," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 63-89, May.
    14. Luda Zhao & Bin Wang & Congyong Shen, 2021. "A multi-objective scheduling method for operational coordination time using improved triangular fuzzy number representation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-31, June.
    15. Suprava Chakraborty & Devaraj Elangovan & Padma Lakshmi Govindarajan & Mohamed F. ELnaggar & Mohammed M. Alrashed & Salah Kamel, 2022. "A Comprehensive Review of Path Planning for Agricultural Ground Robots," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Fang, Yilin & Liu, Quan & Li, Miqing & Laili, Yuanjun & Pham, Duc Truong, 2019. "Evolutionary many-objective optimization for mixed-model disassembly line balancing with multi-robotic workstations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(1), pages 160-174.
    17. Taher Ahmadi & Bo van der Rhee, 2023. "Multiobjective Line Balancing Game: Collaboration and Peer Evaluation," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 179-195, May.
    18. Labiba Noshin Asha & Arup Dey & Nita Yodo & Lucy G. Aragon, 2022. "Optimization Approaches for Multiple Conflicting Objectives in Sustainable Green Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, October.
    19. Yannik Zeiträg & José Rui Figueira, 2023. "Automatically evolving preference-based dispatching rules for multi-objective job shop scheduling," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 289-314, June.
    20. Ana Ruiz & Rubén Saborido & Mariano Luque, 2015. "A preference-based evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization: the weighting achievement scalarizing function genetic algorithm," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 101-129, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:300:y:2022:i:2:p:405-417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.