IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v272y2019i3p1058-1072.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavioral modeling in weight loss interventions

Author

Listed:
  • Aswani, Anil
  • Kaminsky, Philip
  • Mintz, Yonatan
  • Flowers, Elena
  • Fukuoka, Yoshimi

Abstract

Designing systems with human agents is difficult because it often requires models that characterize agents’ responses to changes in the system’s states and inputs. An example of this scenario occurs when designing treatments for obesity. While weight loss interventions through increasing physical activity and modifying diet have found success in reducing individuals’ weight, such programs are difficult to maintain over long periods of time due to lack of patient adherence. A promising approach to increase adherence is through the personalization of treatments to each patient. In this paper, we make a contribution toward treatment personalization by developing a framework for predictive modeling using utility functions that depend upon both time-varying system states and motivational states evolving according to some modeled process corresponding to qualitative social science models of behavior change. Computing the predictive model requires solving a bilevel program, which we reformulate as a mixed-integer linear program (MILP). This reformulation provides the first (to our knowledge) formulation for Bayesian inference that uses empirical histograms as prior distributions. We study the predictive ability of our framework using a data set from a weight loss intervention, and our predictive model is validated by comparison to standard machine learning approaches. We conclude by describing how our predictive model could be used for optimization, unlike standard machine learning approaches that cannot.

Suggested Citation

  • Aswani, Anil & Kaminsky, Philip & Mintz, Yonatan & Flowers, Elena & Fukuoka, Yoshimi, 2019. "Behavioral modeling in weight loss interventions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(3), pages 1058-1072.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:272:y:2019:i:3:p:1058-1072
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221718306167
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Turgay Ayer & Oguzhan Alagoz & Natasha K. Stout, 2012. "OR Forum---A POMDP Approach to Personalize Mammography Screening Decisions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1019-1034, October.
    2. Ravindra K. Ahuja & James B. Orlin, 2001. "Inverse Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(5), pages 771-783, October.
    3. Andersen, Anders Reenberg & Nielsen, Bo Friis & Reinhardt, Line Blander, 2017. "Optimization of hospital ward resources with patient relocation using Markov chain modeling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(3), pages 1152-1163.
    4. Fred Glover, 1975. "Improved Linear Integer Programming Formulations of Nonlinear Integer Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 455-460, December.
    5. Sarang Deo & Seyed Iravani & Tingting Jiang & Karen Smilowitz & Stephen Samuelson, 2013. "Improving Health Outcomes Through Better Capacity Allocation in a Community-Based Chronic Care Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(6), pages 1277-1294, December.
    6. Jonathan E. Helm & Mariel S. Lavieri & Mark P. Van Oyen & Joshua D. Stein & David C. Musch, 2015. "Dynamic Forecasting and Control Algorithms of Glaucoma Progression for Clinician Decision Support," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 979-999, October.
    7. Faramroze G. Engineer & Pınar Keskinocak & Larry K. Pickering, 2009. "OR Practice---Catch-Up Scheduling for Childhood Vaccination," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(6), pages 1307-1319, December.
    8. Robert Tibshirani & Michael Saunders & Saharon Rosset & Ji Zhu & Keith Knight, 2005. "Sparsity and smoothness via the fused lasso," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 67(1), pages 91-108, February.
    9. Gretchen B. Chapman & Arthur S. Elstein, 1995. "Valuing the Future," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 15(4), pages 373-386, October.
    10. Denoyel, Victoire & Alfandari, Laurent & Thiele, Aurélie, 2017. "Optimizing healthcare network design under reference pricing and parameter uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(3), pages 996-1006.
    11. Fetta, Angelico & Harper, Paul & Knight, Vincent & Williams, Janet, 2018. "Predicting adolescent social networks to stop smoking in secondary schools," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(1), pages 263-276.
    12. Oztekin, Asil & Al-Ebbini, Lina & Sevkli, Zulal & Delen, Dursun, 2018. "A decision analytic approach to predicting quality of life for lung transplant recipients: A hybrid genetic algorithms-based methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 639-651.
    13. Clemens Heuberger, 2004. "Inverse Combinatorial Optimization: A Survey on Problems, Methods, and Results," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 329-361, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mintz, Yonatan & Aswani, Anil & Kaminsky, Philip & Flowers, Elena & Fukuoka, Yoshimi, 2023. "Behavioral analytics for myopic agents," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 793-811.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mintz, Yonatan & Aswani, Anil & Kaminsky, Philip & Flowers, Elena & Fukuoka, Yoshimi, 2023. "Behavioral analytics for myopic agents," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 310(2), pages 793-811.
    2. Hessam Bavafa & Sergei Savin & Christian Terwiesch, 2021. "Customizing Primary Care Delivery Using E‐Visits," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4306-4327, November.
    3. Ting-Yu Ho & Shan Liu & Zelda B. Zabinsky, 2019. "A Multi-Fidelity Rollout Algorithm for Dynamic Resource Allocation in Population Disease Management," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 727-755, December.
    4. Bennet Gebken & Sebastian Peitz, 2021. "Inverse multiobjective optimization: Inferring decision criteria from data," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 80(1), pages 3-29, May.
    5. Abumoslem Mohammadi & Javad Tayyebi, 2019. "Maximum Capacity Path Interdiction Problem with Fixed Costs," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 36(04), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Turgay Ayer & Can Zhang & Anthony Bonifonte & Anne C. Spaulding & Jagpreet Chhatwal, 2019. "Prioritizing Hepatitis C Treatment in U.S. Prisons," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 853-873, May.
    7. Timothy C. Y. Chan & Tim Craig & Taewoo Lee & Michael B. Sharpe, 2014. "Generalized Inverse Multiobjective Optimization with Application to Cancer Therapy," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(3), pages 680-695, June.
    8. Nguyen, Kien Trung & Hung, Nguyen Thanh, 2021. "The minmax regret inverse maximum weight problem," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 407(C).
    9. Zeynep Erkin & Matthew D. Bailey & Lisa M. Maillart & Andrew J. Schaefer & Mark S. Roberts, 2010. "Eliciting Patients' Revealed Preferences: An Inverse Markov Decision Process Approach," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 7(4), pages 358-365, December.
    10. Chassein, André & Goerigk, Marc, 2018. "Variable-sized uncertainty and inverse problems in robust optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 17-28.
    11. Vincent Mousseau & Özgür Özpeynirci & Selin Özpeynirci, 2018. "Inverse multiple criteria sorting problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 379-412, August.
    12. T. R. Wang & N. Pedroni & E. Zio & V. Mousseau, 2020. "Identification of Protective Actions to Reduce the Vulnerability of Safety‐Critical Systems to Malevolent Intentional Acts: An Optimization‐Based Decision‐Making Approach," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(3), pages 565-587, March.
    13. Javad Tayyebi & Ali Reza Sepasian, 2020. "Partial inverse min–max spanning tree problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 1075-1091, November.
    14. Rico Walter & Martin Wirth & Alexander Lawrinenko, 2017. "Improved approaches to the exact solution of the machine covering problem," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 147-164, April.
    15. András Kovács, 2021. "Inverse optimization approach to the identification of electricity consumer models," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(2), pages 521-537, June.
    16. Rishabh Gupta & Qi Zhang, 2022. "Decomposition and Adaptive Sampling for Data-Driven Inverse Linear Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2720-2735, September.
    17. Hughes, Michael S. & Lunday, Brian J., 2022. "The Weapon Target Assignment Problem: Rational Inference of Adversary Target Utility Valuations from Observed Solutions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    18. Jia Wu & Yi Zhang & Liwei Zhang & Yue Lu, 2016. "A Sequential Convex Program Approach to an Inverse Linear Semidefinite Programming Problem," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(04), pages 1-26, August.
    19. Zlatana Nenova & Jennifer Shang, 2022. "Personalized Chronic Disease Follow‐Up Appointments: Risk‐Stratified Care Through Big Data," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 583-606, February.
    20. Tinglong Dai & Sridhar Tayur, 2020. "OM Forum—Healthcare Operations Management: A Snapshot of Emerging Research," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 869-887, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:272:y:2019:i:3:p:1058-1072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.