IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v258y2017i3p1022-1032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Timeliness evaluation of emergency resource scheduling

Author

Listed:
  • Chi, Hong
  • Li, Jialian
  • Shao, Xueyan
  • Gao, Mingang

Abstract

Most current research describes emergency resource scheduling as a multi-objective optimization problem. Each objective contributes to scheduling comprehensive effects. In many cases, goals are correlated. For example, reducing the scheduling time requires more resources and costs. Thus, an effect that approaches reality should be observed under conditions of mutual matching and combined roles of objectives. This study constructs a non-linear timeliness evaluation function for emergency resource scheduling that incorporates a single affected point, multiple supply centers and one type of resource, which combines two scheduling objectives, i.e., time and resource satisfaction, into a timeliness function. The evaluation function is a monotonically increasing function and a monotonically decreasing function with respect to the quantity and time of two batches of resource arrivals, respectively. Function values change within the range of demands for quantity and time of resources arrivals, but function values change little beyond the range of the demands, which is highly consistent with qualitative cognition. This study considers real mine water leak accidents and calculates the time for the water level in the mine to drop to the safety line using a simulation method according to the mechanism of water level change caused by the mine structure, water leakage flow and pumping, and then implements contrastive analyses of the results of the timeliness evaluation function and simulation method, and then concludes that timeliness evaluation functions are reasonable and require less information and less detail. This research provides new insight into the design of objective functions utilized in emergency resource scheduling.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi, Hong & Li, Jialian & Shao, Xueyan & Gao, Mingang, 2017. "Timeliness evaluation of emergency resource scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 1022-1032.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:258:y:2017:i:3:p:1022-1032
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.09.034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722171630786X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.09.034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linet Özdamar & Ediz Ekinci & Beste Küçükyazici, 2004. "Emergency Logistics Planning in Natural Disasters," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 129(1), pages 217-245, July.
    2. Stuart Coles & Luis Pericchi, 2003. "Anticipating catastrophes through extreme value modelling," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 52(4), pages 405-416, October.
    3. Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung & Cheng, Hsin-Jung & Huang, Tsung Dow, 2007. "Multi-objective optimal planning for designing relief delivery systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 673-686, November.
    4. Afshar, Abbas & Haghani, Ali, 2012. "Modeling integrated supply chain logistics in real-time large-scale disaster relief operations," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 327-338.
    5. Vladimir P. Reshetin & James L. Regens, 2003. "Simulation Modeling of Anthrax Spore Dispersion in a Bioterrorism Incident," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(6), pages 1135-1145, December.
    6. Lin, Yen-Hung & Batta, Rajan & Rogerson, Peter A. & Blatt, Alan & Flanigan, Marie, 2011. "A logistics model for emergency supply of critical items in the aftermath of a disaster," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 132-145, December.
    7. Artalejo, J. R., 2000. "G-networks: A versatile approach for work removal in queueing networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 233-249, October.
    8. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2007. "An emergency logistics distribution approach for quick response to urgent relief demand in disasters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 687-709, November.
    9. Yi, Wei & Ozdamar, Linet, 2007. "A dynamic logistics coordination model for evacuation and support in disaster response activities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(3), pages 1177-1193, June.
    10. Wilson, Duncan T. & Hawe, Glenn I. & Coates, Graham & Crouch, Roger S., 2013. "A multi-objective combinatorial model of casualty processing in major incident response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 643-655.
    11. Sung, Inkyung & Lee, Taesik, 2016. "Optimal allocation of emergency medical resources in a mass casualty incident: Patient prioritization by column generation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 623-634.
    12. Junfei Huang & Boaz Carmeli & Avishai Mandelbaum, 2015. "Control of Patient Flow in Emergency Departments, or Multiclass Queues with Deadlines and Feedback," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 892-908, August.
    13. Yi, Wei & Kumar, Arun, 2007. "Ant colony optimization for disaster relief operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 660-672, November.
    14. Özdamar, Linet & Demir, Onur, 2012. "A hierarchical clustering and routing procedure for large scale disaster relief logistics planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 591-602.
    15. Tamura, Hiroyuki & Yamamoto, Kouji & Tomiyama, Shinji & Hatono, Itsuo, 2000. "Modeling and analysis of decision making problem for mitigating natural disaster risks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 461-468, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Dingjun & Fang, Xufeng & Li, Yao & Ni, Shaoquan & Zhang, Qingpeng & Sang, Chin Kwai, 2022. "Three-level multimodal transportation network for cross-regional emergency resources dispatch under demand and route reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Shawhan, Daniel L. & Picciano, Paul D., 2019. "Costs and benefits of saving unprofitable generators: A simulation case study for US coal and nuclear power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 383-400.
    3. Fattahi, Mohammad & Keyvanshokooh, Esmaeil & Kannan, Devika & Govindan, Kannan, 2023. "Resource planning strategies for healthcare systems during a pandemic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 192-206.
    4. Sperling, Martina & Schryen, Guido, 2022. "Decision support for disaster relief: Coordinating spontaneous volunteers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 299(2), pages 690-705.
    5. Wenqi Cui & Xinwu Chen & Boyu Liu & Qian Hu & Miaomiao Ma & Xing Xu & Zhanyun Feng & Jiale Chen & Wei Cui, 2023. "Research on a Scheduling Model for Social Emergency Resource Sharing Based on Emergency Contribution Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caunhye, Aakil M. & Nie, Xiaofeng & Pokharel, Shaligram, 2012. "Optimization models in emergency logistics: A literature review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 4-13.
    2. A. Anaya-Arenas & J. Renaud & A. Ruiz, 2014. "Relief distribution networks: a systematic review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 53-79, December.
    3. Lu, Chung-Cheng & Ying, Kuo-Ching & Chen, Hui-Ju, 2016. "Real-time relief distribution in the aftermath of disasters – A rolling horizon approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 1-20.
    4. Najafi, Mehdi & Eshghi, Kourosh & Dullaert, Wout, 2013. "A multi-objective robust optimization model for logistics planning in the earthquake response phase," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 217-249.
    5. Rivera-Royero, Daniel & Galindo, Gina & Yie-Pinedo, Ruben, 2020. "Planning the delivery of relief supplies upon the occurrence of a natural disaster while considering the assembly process of the relief kits," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    6. Rivera-Royero, Daniel & Galindo, Gina & Yie-Pinedo, Ruben, 2016. "A dynamic model for disaster response considering prioritized demand points," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 59-75.
    7. Yiping Jiang & Yufei Yuan, 2019. "Emergency Logistics in a Large-Scale Disaster Context: Achievements and Challenges," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-23, March.
    8. Abhishek Behl & Pankaj Dutta, 2019. "Humanitarian supply chain management: a thematic literature review and future directions of research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1001-1044, December.
    9. Rodríguez-Espíndola, Oscar & Ahmadi, Hossein & Gastélum-Chavira, Diego & Ahumada-Valenzuela, Omar & Chowdhury, Soumyadeb & Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Albores, Pavel, 2023. "Humanitarian logistics optimization models: An investigation of decision-maker involvement and directions to promote implementation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    10. Özdamar, Linet & Ertem, Mustafa Alp, 2015. "Models, solutions and enabling technologies in humanitarian logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 55-65.
    11. Wilson, Duncan T. & Hawe, Glenn I. & Coates, Graham & Crouch, Roger S., 2013. "A multi-objective combinatorial model of casualty processing in major incident response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(3), pages 643-655.
    12. Altay, Nezih & Green III, Walter G., 2006. "OR/MS research in disaster operations management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 475-493, November.
    13. Renata Turkeš & Daniel Palhazi Cuervo & Kenneth Sörensen, 2019. "Pre-positioning of emergency supplies: does putting a price on human life help to save lives?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 865-895, December.
    14. Moreno, Alfredo & Alem, Douglas & Ferreira, Deisemara & Clark, Alistair, 2018. "An effective two-stage stochastic multi-trip location-transportation model with social concerns in relief supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(3), pages 1050-1071.
    15. Zhou, Yawen & Liu, Jing & Zhang, Yutong & Gan, Xiaohui, 2017. "A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for multi-period dynamic emergency resource scheduling problems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 77-95.
    16. Huang, Kai & Jiang, Yiping & Yuan, Yufei & Zhao, Lindu, 2015. "Modeling multiple humanitarian objectives in emergency response to large-scale disasters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1-17.
    17. Yanbin Chang & Yongjia Song & Burak Eksioglu, 2022. "A stochastic look-ahead approach for hurricane relief logistics operations planning under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1231-1263, December.
    18. Afshin Kamyabniya & M. M. Lotfi & Mohsen Naderpour & Yuehwern Yih, 2018. "Robust Platelet Logistics Planning in Disaster Relief Operations Under Uncertainty: a Coordinated Approach," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 759-782, August.
    19. Masoud Mahootchi & Sajjad Golmohammadi, 2018. "Developing a new stochastic model considering bi-directional relations in a natural disaster: a possible earthquake in Tehran (the Capital of Islamic Republic of Iran)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 439-473, October.
    20. Zhongzhen Yang & Liquan Guo & Zaili Yang, 2019. "Emergency logistics for wildfire suppression based on forecasted disaster evolution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 917-937, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:258:y:2017:i:3:p:1022-1032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.