IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v208y2011i1p75-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Secure collaborative supply chain planning and inverse optimization - The JELS model

Author

Listed:
  • Pibernik, Richard
  • Zhang, Yingying
  • Kerschbaum, Florian
  • Schröpfer, Axel

Abstract

It is a well-acknowledged fact that collaboration between different members of a supply chain yields a significant potential to increase overall supply chain performance. Sharing private information has been identified as prerequisite for collaboration and, at the same time, as one of its major obstacles. One potential avenue for overcoming this obstacle is Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMC). SMC is a cryptographic technique that enables the computation of any (well-defined) mathematical function by a number of parties without any party having to disclose its input to another party. In this paper, we show how SMC can be successfully employed to enable joint decision-making and benefit sharing in a simple supply chain setting. We develop secure protocols for implementing the well-known "Joint Economic Lot Size (JELS) Model" with benefit sharing in such a way that none of the parties involved has to disclose any private (cost and capacity) data. Thereupon, we show that although computation of the model's outputs can be performed securely, the approach still faces practical limitations. These limitations are caused by the potential of "inverse optimization", i.e., a party can infer another party's private data from the output of a collaborative planning scheme even if the computation is performed in a secure fashion. We provide a detailed analysis of "inverse optimization" potentials and introduce the notion of "stochastic security", a novel approach to assess the additional information a party may learn from joint computation and benefit sharing. Based on our definition of "stochastic security" we propose a stochastic benefit sharing rule, develop a secure protocol for this benefit sharing rule, and assess under which conditions stochastic benefit sharing can guarantee secure collaboration.

Suggested Citation

  • Pibernik, Richard & Zhang, Yingying & Kerschbaum, Florian & Schröpfer, Axel, 2011. "Secure collaborative supply chain planning and inverse optimization - The JELS model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 208(1), pages 75-85, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:208:y:2011:i:1:p:75-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(10)00555-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yu, Yugang & Huang, George Q., 2010. "Nash game model for optimizing market strategies, configuration of platform products in a Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) supply chain for a product family," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 361-373, October.
    2. Hau L. Lee & Kut C. So & Christopher S. Tang, 2000. "The Value of Information Sharing in a Two-Level Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(5), pages 626-643, May.
    3. Yu, Yugang & Chu, Feng & Chen, Haoxun, 2009. "A Stackelberg game and its improvement in a VMI system with a manufacturing vendor," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(3), pages 929-948, February.
    4. Sucky, Eric, 2006. "A bargaining model with asymmetric information for a single supplier-single buyer problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 516-535, June.
    5. Chris Clifton & Ananth Iyer & Richard Cho & Wei Jiang & Murat Kantarc{i}ou{g}lu & Jaideep Vaidya, 2008. "An Approach to Securely Identifying Beneficial Collaboration in Decentralized Logistics Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 108-125, January.
    6. Gérard P. Cachon & Martin A. Lariviere, 2005. "Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and Limitations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(1), pages 30-44, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Xiaoyan & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Chung, Sai-Ho & Guo, Shu, 2023. "Collaborative-commerce in supply chains: A review and classification of analytical models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    2. Crönert, Tobias & Martin, Layla & Minner, Stefan & Tang, Christopher S., 2024. "Inverse optimization of integer programming games for parameter estimation arising from competitive retail location selection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 938-953.
    3. Pishchulov, Grigory & Richter, Knut, 2016. "Optimal contract design in the joint economic lot size problem with multi-dimensional asymmetric information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 253(3), pages 711-733.
    4. Sharad Barkataki & Hassan Zeineddine, 2015. "On achieving secure collaboration in supply chains," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 691-705, June.
    5. Dobos, Imre & Gobsch, Barbara & Pakhomova, Nadezhda & Pishchulov, Grigory & Richter, Knut, 2011. "A vendor-purchaser economic lot size problem with remanufacturing and deposit," Discussion Papers 304, European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Department of Business Administration and Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lode Li & Hongtao Zhang, 2008. "Confidentiality and Information Sharing in Supply Chain Coordination," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(8), pages 1467-1481, August.
    2. Lau, Amy Hing Ling & Lau, Hon-Shiang & Wang, Jian-Cai, 2008. "How a dominant retailer might design a purchase contract for a newsvendor-type product with price-sensitive demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 443-458, October.
    3. Hsieh, Chung-Chi & Wu, Cheng-Han & Huang, Ya-Jing, 2008. "Ordering and pricing decisions in a two-echelon supply chain with asymmetric demand information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 509-525, October.
    4. Yumi Lee & Sang Hwa Song & Taesu Cheong, 2018. "The value of supply chain coordination under moral hazard: A case study of the consumer product supply chain," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, March.
    5. repec:dau:papers:123456789/522 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Wang, Jian-Cai & Lau, Hon-Shiang & Lau, Amy Hing Ling, 2009. "When should a manufacturer share truthful manufacturing cost information with a dominant retailer?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(1), pages 266-286, August.
    7. Sainathan, Arvind & Groenevelt, Harry, 2019. "Vendor managed inventory contracts – coordinating the supply chain while looking from the vendor’s perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 249-260.
    8. Cai, Jianhu & Hu, Xiaoqing & Tadikamalla, Pandu R. & Shang, Jennifer, 2017. "Flexible contract design for VMI supply chain with service-sensitive demand: Revenue-sharing and supplier subsidy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 143-153.
    9. Senlin Zhao & Qinghua Zhu, 2017. "Remanufacturing supply chain coordination under the stochastic remanufacturability rate and the random demand," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 661-695, October.
    10. Huynh, Candice H. & Pan, Wenting, 2015. "Operational strategies for supplier and retailer with risk preference under VMI contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 413-421.
    11. Fidel Torres & César García-Díaz, 2018. "Evolutionary dynamics of two-actor VMI-driven supply chains," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 351-377, September.
    12. Mobini, Zahra & van den Heuvel, Wilco & Wagelmans, Albert, 2019. "Designing multi-period supply contracts in a two-echelon supply chain with asymmetric information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(2), pages 542-560.
    13. Yao, Yuliang & Dong, Yan & Dresner, Martin, 2010. "Managing supply chain backorders under vendor managed inventory: An incentive approach and empirical analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(2), pages 350-359, June.
    14. Mark Ferguson & Michael E. Ketzenberg, 2006. "Information Sharing to Improve Retail Product Freshness of Perishables," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 15(1), pages 57-73, March.
    15. Li, Tian & Zhang, Hongtao, 2015. "Information sharing in a supply chain with a make-to-stock manufacturer," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 115-125.
    16. Heese, H. Sebastian & Kemahlıoğlu-Ziya, Eda, 2016. "Don't ask, don't tell: Sharing revenues with a dishonest retailer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 580-592.
    17. Guan, Ruoxi & Zhao, Xiaobo, 2010. "On contracts for VMI program with continuous review (r, Q) policy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 656-667, December.
    18. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    19. Albert Y. Ha & Shilu Tong, 2008. "Contracting and Information Sharing Under Supply Chain Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 701-715, April.
    20. Guangwen Kong & Sampath Rajagopalan & Hao Zhang, 2013. "Revenue Sharing and Information Leakage in a Supply Chain," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 556-572, November.
    21. Liu, Hao & Jiang, Wei & Feng, Gengzhong & Chin, Kwai-Sang, 2020. "Information leakage and supply chain contracts," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:208:y:2011:i:1:p:75-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.