IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v468y2022ics0304380022000680.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical dynamic modeling framework for missing or irregular samples

Author

Listed:
  • Johnson, Bethany
  • Munch, Stephan B.

Abstract

Empirical dynamic modeling (EDM) is a powerful method for forecasting and analyzing nonlinear dynamics. However, typical applications of EDM assume that samples are evenly spaced over time. This presents problems in ecology, in which data are often missing or sampled irregularly. Standard methods for handling irregularity in EDM suffer under conditions that are common in ecology, such as short time series and large dynamic fluctuations, so there is a need to adapt the framework to cope with these challenges more effectively. Here we consider a variable step-size extension of EDM, which incorporates the temporal spacing between samples into EDM delay-coordinate vectors and circumvents the challenges faced by other approaches. We evaluated the forecast accuracy of the variable step-size method along with that of two other methods: (1) exclusion of delay-coordinate vectors with missing data and (2) linear interpolation along with ordinary EDM. We tested these methods using simulated data from three chaotic ecological models with various amounts and patterns of missing data. We also evaluated them using two empirical datasets: laboratory rotifer dynamics and aphid dynamics from the field. Results showed that while exclusion and linear interpolation can produce accurate forecasts in some scenarios, the variable step-size method consistently gives accurate forecasts in a wide range of scenarios. Our analysis demonstrates that variable step-size EDM is an effective method for coping with missing or irregular samples and expands the number of datasets to which EDM can be applied. Furthermore, EDM can be extended to estimate Lyapunov exponents from irregularly sampled time series and approximate continuous dynamics from discrete-time data.

Suggested Citation

  • Johnson, Bethany & Munch, Stephan B., 2022. "An empirical dynamic modeling framework for missing or irregular samples," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 468(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:468:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022000680
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380022000680
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109948?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brias, Antoine & Munch, Stephan B., 2021. "Ecosystem based multi-species management using Empirical Dynamic Programming," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 441(C).
    2. Xiao Liu & Param Vir Singh & Kannan Srinivasan, 2016. "A Structured Analysis of Unstructured Big Data by Leveraging Cloud Computing," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 363-388, May.
    3. Elamurugu Alias Gokul & Dionysios E Raitsos & John A Gittings & Abdulsalam Alkawri & Ibrahim Hoteit, 2019. "Remotely sensing harmful algal blooms in the Red Sea," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Ser-Huang Poon & Clive W.J. Granger, 2003. "Forecasting Volatility in Financial Markets: A Review," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 41(2), pages 478-539, June.
    5. Masayuki Ushio & Chih-hao Hsieh & Reiji Masuda & Ethan R Deyle & Hao Ye & Chun-Wei Chang & George Sugihara & Michio Kondoh, 2018. "Fluctuating interaction network and time-varying stability of a natural fish community," Nature, Nature, vol. 554(7692), pages 360-363, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bentes, Sonia R. & Menezes, Rui, 2013. "On the predictability of realized volatility using feasible GLS," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 58-66.
    2. Athanasia Gavala & Nikolay Gospodinov & Deming Jiang, 2006. "Forecasting volatility," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6), pages 381-400.
    3. Christos Floros & Konstantinos Gkillas & Christoforos Konstantatos & Athanasios Tsagkanos, 2020. "Realized Measures to Explain Volatility Changes over Time," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Berens, Tobias & Weiß, Gregor N.F. & Wied, Dominik, 2015. "Testing for structural breaks in correlations: Does it improve Value-at-Risk forecasting?," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 135-152.
    5. Alex Huang, 2013. "Value at risk estimation by quantile regression and kernel estimator," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 225-251, August.
    6. Chia-Lin Chang & Tai-Lin Hsieh & Michael McAleer, 2016. "Connecting VIX and Stock Index ETF," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 16-010/III, Tinbergen Institute, revised 23 Jan 2017.
    7. Stentoft, Lars, 2005. "Pricing American options when the underlying asset follows GARCH processes," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 576-611, September.
    8. Onour , Ibrahim A., 2021. "Modeling and assessing systematic risk in stock markets in major oil exporting countries," Economic Consultant, Roman I. Ostapenko, vol. 35(3), pages 18-29.
    9. Yi Yang & Kunpeng Zhang & Yangyang Fan, 2023. "sDTM: A Supervised Bayesian Deep Topic Model for Text Analytics," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 137-156, March.
    10. Ishani Chaudhuri & Parthajit Kayal, 2022. "Predicting Power of Ticker Search Volume in Indian Stock Market," Working Papers 2022-214, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    11. Heejoon Han & Myung D. Park, 2013. "Comparison of Realized Measure and Implied Volatility in Forecasting Volatility," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 522-533, September.
    12. Ernst Konrad, 2009. "The impact of monetary policy surprises on asset return volatility: the case of Germany," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 23(2), pages 111-135, June.
    13. Charles, Amélie, 2010. "The day-of-the-week effects on the volatility: The role of the asymmetry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(1), pages 143-152, April.
    14. Bijl, Laurens & Kringhaug, Glenn & Molnár, Peter & Sandvik, Eirik, 2016. "Google searches and stock returns," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 150-156.
    15. Ralf Becker & Adam Clements & Robert O'Neill, 2018. "A Multivariate Kernel Approach to Forecasting the Variance Covariance of Stock Market Returns," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-27, February.
    16. Duncan A. O’Brien & Smita Deb & Gideon Gal & Stephen J. Thackeray & Partha S. Dutta & Shin-ichiro S. Matsuzaki & Linda May & Christopher F. Clements, 2023. "Early warning signals have limited applicability to empirical lake data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Ricardo Crisóstomo, 2021. "Estimating real‐world probabilities: A forward‐looking behavioral framework," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(11), pages 1797-1823, November.
    18. Fernandez, Viviana, 2007. "A postcard from the past: The behavior of U.S. stock markets during 1871–1938," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 386(1), pages 267-282.
    19. Bag, Sujoy & Tiwari, Manoj Kumar & Chan, Felix T.S., 2019. "Predicting the consumer's purchase intention of durable goods: An attribute-level analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 408-419.
    20. Christoffersen, Peter & Jacobs, Kris & Chang, Bo Young, 2013. "Forecasting with Option-Implied Information," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, in: G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 581-656, Elsevier.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:468:y:2022:i:c:s0304380022000680. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.