IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v439y2021ics0304380020303951.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the impact of wild harvest on plant–disperser mutualisms

Author

Listed:
  • De Angeli, Kevin
  • Abbasi, Eeman
  • Gan, Alan
  • Ingram, Daniel J.
  • Giam, Xingli
  • Chang, Charlotte H.

Abstract

Across the tropics, millions of rural families rely on non-timber forest products for protein, subsistence, and other financial or cultural uses. Often, communities exploit biotically dispersed trees and their mammalian or avian seed disperser. Empirical findings have indicated that many plant and animal resources are overexploited, presenting challenges for biodiversity conservation and sustainable rural livelihoods. However, there has been limited research investigating the impacts of harvest that targets both seed dispersers and zoochoric trees. We formulated a discrete-time model for interacting seed dispersers and plants under harvest. We found that the more dependent species will dictate the sustainable threshold level of harvest, and that higher levels of dependence could drive the species pair to local extinction. We illustrated the application of sensitivity analysis to our modeling framework in order to facilitate future analyses and applications using this approach.

Suggested Citation

  • De Angeli, Kevin & Abbasi, Eeman & Gan, Alan & Ingram, Daniel J. & Giam, Xingli & Chang, Charlotte H., 2021. "Modeling the impact of wild harvest on plant–disperser mutualisms," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 439(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:439:y:2021:i:c:s0304380020303951
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380020303951
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicole Guedje & Jean Lejoly & Pieter P.A. Zuidema & Heinjo During & Bernard Foahom, 2007. "Tree bark as a non-timber forest product: The effect of bark collection on population structure and dynamics of Garcinia lucida Vesque," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/181129, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Anand M. Osuri & Jayashree Ratnam & Varun Varma & Patricia Alvarez-Loayza & Johanna Hurtado Astaiza & Matt Bradford & Christine Fletcher & Mireille Ndoundou-Hockemba & Patrick A. Jansen & David Kenfac, 2016. "Contrasting effects of defaunation on aboveground carbon storage across the global tropics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 7(1), pages 1-7, September.
    3. Wacker, Holger, 1999. "Optimal harvesting of mutualistic ecological systems," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 89-102, January.
    4. Nielsen, Martin R. & Meilby, Henrik & Smith-Hall, Carsten & Pouliot, Mariève & Treue, Thorsten, 2018. "The Importance of Wild Meat in the Global South," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 696-705.
    5. Richard Damania & Randy Stringer & K. Ullas Karanth & Brad Stith, 2003. "The Economics of Protecting Tiger Populations: Linking Household Behavior to Poaching and Prey Depletion," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 79(2), pages 198-216.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Conrad, Jon M. & Lopes, Adrian A., 2017. "Poaching and the dynamics of a protected species," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 55-67.
    2. Zabel, Astrid & Engel, Stefanie, 2010. "Performance payments: A new strategy to conserve large carnivores in the tropics?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2), pages 405-412, December.
    3. Eppink, Florian V. & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2007. "Ecological theories and indicators in economic models of biodiversity loss and conservation: A critical review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 284-293, March.
    4. Sumitra Paudel & Carsten Smith-Hall, 2022. "Empirically derived typologies of environmental product periodic markets and retailers," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 13111-13136, November.
    5. Lopez-Feldman, Alejandro, 2005. "Panel Data Evidence on the Determinants of Non-Timber Forest Products Extraction: The Case of Xate in Mexico," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19410, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Solomon Zena Walelign & Martin Reinhardt Nielsen & Jette Bredahl Jacobsen, 2019. "Roads and livelihood activity choices in the Greater Serengeti Ecosystem, Tanzania," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Brodie, Jedediah F., 2018. "Carbon Costs and Bushmeat Benefits of Hunting in Tropical Forests," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 22-26.
    8. Newman, D.H., 2002. "Forestry's golden rule and the development of the optimal forest rotation literature," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 5-27.
    9. Melstrom, Richard T. & Horan, Richard D., 2012. "Managing Excessive Predation in a Predator-Prey Setting: The Case of Piping Plovers," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 123350, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Astrid Zabel & Karen Pittel & Göran Bostedt & Stefanie Engel, 2011. "Comparing Conventional and New Policy Approaches for Carnivore Conservation: Theoretical Results and Application to Tiger Conservation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(2), pages 287-301, February.
    11. Bliss, Sam & Egler, Megan, 2020. "Ecological Economics Beyond Markets," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    12. N. Quérou & A. Tomini, 2018. "Marine Ecosystem Considerations and Second-Best Management," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 70(2), pages 381-401, June.
    13. Birgit Bednar-Friedl & Edwin Muchapondwa & Precious Zikhali & Samson Mukanjari, 2012. "Evaluating the Prospects of Benefit Sharing Schemes in Protecting Mountain Gorillas in Central Africa," Working Papers 321, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    14. Johannus Janmaat, 2012. "Fishing in a Shallow Lake: Exploring a Classic Fishery Model in a Habitat with Shallow Lake Dynamics," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 51(2), pages 215-239, February.
    15. Bello, Carolina & Culot, Laurence & Ruiz Agudelo, Cesar Augusto & Galetti, Mauro, 2021. "Valuing the economic impacts of seed dispersal loss on voluntary carbon markets," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    16. Niraj, Shekhar K. & Dayal, Vikram & Krausman, Paul R., 2010. "Applying methodological pluralism to wildlife and the economy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1610-1616, June.
    17. Sam Bliss, 2019. "The Case for Studying Non-Market Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-30, June.
    18. López-Feldman, Alejandro & Edward Taylor, J., 2009. "Labor allocation to non-timber extraction in a Mexican rainforest community," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 205-221, August.
    19. Zijin Xie, 2022. "Government intervention in wildlife damage management: a bioeconomic analysis of wildlife damage compensation and taxation policies," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 93-115, April.
    20. Tibor Neugebauer, 2005. "Bioeconomics Of Sustainable Harvest Of Competing Species: A Comment," Others 0503012, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:439:y:2021:i:c:s0304380020303951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.