IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v213y2023ics0921800923002021.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Oil offsets in Esmeraldas (Ecuador) When the promotion of development shores up unequal risk situations

Author

Listed:
  • Rebotier, Julien

Abstract

The radical school identifies development as a core strategy for enduring disaster risk reduction. Simultaneously, development policies pursued by neoextractivism States often result in social and territorial dynamics that recompose risk situations without necessarily reducing them. They sometimes even intensify them. The city of Esmeraldas perfectly illustrates the detrimental effects when it comes to the risks of a voluntarist State policy based on oil revenue. Esmeraldas hosts infrastructures that are strategic for the country, for oil processing and export from the Oriente oil fields. The periods of government under Correa's presidency (2007–2017) saw a momentum of compensatory investments (linked to the exploitation of primary resources) and pro-development (with respect to marginal territories catching up), which particularly concerned Esmeraldas. Analysis shows that the considerable sums invested in the city for these reasons resulted in the urban territory evolving without a shared vision. Ultimately, risk situations were recomposed (in certain cases intensified); the colossal economic resources that were mobilised did not give rise to progress commensurate with investments (the development objective remained intact); ways of managing territories and also development and compensatory funds remained structurally asymmetrical, cultivating subordination that constituted one of the long-term props shoring up risks in Esmeraldas.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebotier, Julien, 2023. "Oil offsets in Esmeraldas (Ecuador) When the promotion of development shores up unequal risk situations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:213:y:2023:i:c:s0921800923002021
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800923002021
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107939?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandoval, Fabián, 1990. "Petróleo y desarrollo regional en Esmeraldas," Sede de la CEPAL en Santiago (Estudios e Investigaciones) 29820, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    2. Gastineau, Pascal & Mossay, Pascal & Taugourdeau, Emmanuelle, 2021. "Ecological compensation: How much and where?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Michael Gillenwater & Derik Broekhoff & Mark Trexler & Jasmine Hyman & Rob Fowler, 2007. "Policing the voluntary carbon market," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 1(711), pages 85-87, November.
    4. Kevin Anderson, 2012. "The inconvenient truth of carbon offsets," Nature, Nature, vol. 484(7392), pages 7-7, April.
    5. Sheng, Jichuan, 2019. "Neoliberal environmentality and incentive-coordinated REDD+ contracts," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 400-407.
    6. Casey, James F. & Kahn, James R. & Rivas, Alexandre A.F., 2008. "Willingness to accept compensation for the environmental risks of oil transport on the Amazon: A choice modeling experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 552-559, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kanbur, Ravi & Bento, Antonio M. & Leard, Benjamin, 2012. "SUPER-ADDITIONALITY: A Neglected Force in Markets for Carbon Offsets," Working Papers 128811, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    2. Stefano Carattini & Andrea Baranzini & Philippe Thalmann & Frédéric Varone & Frank Vöhringer, 2017. "Green Taxes in a Post-Paris World: Are Millions of Nays Inevitable?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(1), pages 97-128, September.
    3. Adeline Montlaur & Luis Delgado & César Trapote-Barreira, 2021. "Analytical Models for CO 2 Emissions and Travel Time for Short-to-Medium-Haul Flights Considering Available Seats," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Bocci, Corinne F. & Lupi, Frank & Sohngen, Brent, 2018. "Timber or Carbon? Evaluating forest conservation strategies through a discrete choice experiment conducted in northern Guatemala," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274011, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Grammatikopoulou, Ioanna & Pouta, Eija & Artell, Janne, 2019. "Heterogeneity and attribute non-attendance in preferences for peatland conservation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 45-55.
    6. Ana Faria Lopes & Gorm Kipperberg, 2020. "Diagnosing Insensitivity to Scope in Contingent Valuation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(1), pages 191-216, September.
    7. Balaine, Lorraine & Gallai, Nicola & Del Corso, Jean-Pierre & Kephaliacos, Charilaos, 2020. "Trading off environmental goods for compensations: Insights from traditional and deliberative valuation methods in the Ecuadorian Amazon," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    8. Wildauer, Rafael & Leitch, Stuart & Kapeller, Jakob, 2020. "How to boost the European Green Deal's scale and ambition," ifso expertise 8, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Socioeconomics (ifso).
    9. Caroline Flammer, 2019. "Green Bonds: Effectiveness and Implications for Public Policy," NBER Chapters, in: Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, volume 1, pages 95-128, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Lüthi, Sonja & Wüstenhagen, Rolf, 2012. "The price of policy risk — Empirical insights from choice experiments with European photovoltaic project developers," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 1001-1011.
    11. Stefano Carattini & Alessandro Tavoni, 2016. "How green are economists?," GRI Working Papers 247, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    12. Baranzini, Andrea & Borzykowski, Nicolas & Carattini, Stefano, 2018. "Carbon offsets out of the woods? Acceptability of domestic vs. international reforestation programmes in the lab," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-12.
    13. Mekdes Dessie & Dawit Moges & Getachew Mekonnen, 2018. "Economic Valuation of Parthenium Weed Control Measures, in Gurage Zone, SNNPR of Ethiopia," Current Investigations in Agriculture and Current Research, Lupine Publishers, LLC, vol. 4(5), pages 600-607, September.
    14. Mathews, John A., 2008. "How carbon credits could drive the emergence of renewable energies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 3633-3639, October.
    15. Johan Warburg & Britta Frommeyer & Julia Koch & Sven‐Olaf Gerdt & Gerhard Schewe, 2021. "Voluntary carbon offsetting and consumer choices for environmentally critical products—An experimental study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3009-3024, November.
    16. Diederich, Johannes & Goeschl, Timo, 2017. "Does Mitigation Begin At Home?," Working Papers 0634, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.
    17. Stefano Carattini & Alessandro Tavoni, 2016. "How green are green economists?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(4), pages 2311-2323.
    18. Bocci, Corinne & Sohngen, Brent & Lupi, Frank & Milian, Bayron, 2020. "Timber or carbon? Evaluating forest conservation strategies through a discrete choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    19. Juan Camilo Cárdenas, 2009. "Experiments in Environment and Development," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 1(1), pages 157-182, September.
    20. Andrea Baranzini & Nicolas Borzykowski & Stefano Carattini, 2016. "Carbon offsets out of the woods? The acceptability of domestic vs. international reforestation programmes," GRI Working Papers 257, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:213:y:2023:i:c:s0921800923002021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.