IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecolec/v181y2021ics0921800920321947.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does information matter? Transparency and demand for accountability in Ghana's natural resource revenue management

Author

Listed:
  • Brunnschweiler, Christa
  • Edjekumhene, Ishmael
  • Lujala, Päivi

Abstract

Transparency in resource revenue management is seen as an important strategy to avoid misuse and misappropriation. Theory predicts that transparency will allow citizens to gain information on revenue management; better informed citizens in turn will enter the debate on resource governance issues, voice concerns, and demand improved accountability if necessary. However, there is little micro-level evidence on how transparency policies relate to better citizen knowledge, or to differences in attitudes towards revenue management and in demand for accountability. We analyze data from a unique survey of over 3500 Ghanaian citizens to understand how Ghana's extractive sector transparency measures are linked to citizens' knowledge, rights perception, satisfaction levels, and behavior regarding resource revenue management. Our results suggest that information levels among citizens are quite poor; however, there is a strong sense of citizens' right to benefit from resource revenues. Satisfaction with the status quo is very low; yet, few respondents have sought more information, or even discussed resource revenue management with friends or family. The results also hold for elected representatives, who should be best placed to influence resource governance. The findings imply that the transparency discourse hinges on false assumptions of the effects of information in resource revenue management.

Suggested Citation

  • Brunnschweiler, Christa & Edjekumhene, Ishmael & Lujala, Päivi, 2021. "Does information matter? Transparency and demand for accountability in Ghana's natural resource revenue management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:181:y:2021:i:c:s0921800920321947
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106903
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800920321947
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106903?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Van Alstine, 2014. "Transparency in Resource Governance: The Pitfalls and Potential of “New Oil” in Sub-Saharan Africa," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 14(1), pages 20-39, February.
    2. Jennifer M. Brinkerhoff & Derick W. Brinkerhoff & Susan Ariel Aaronson, 2011. "Limited partnership: Business, government, civil society, and the public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 31(1), pages 50-63, February.
    3. Frederick van der Ploeg, 2011. "Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 49(2), pages 366-420, June.
    4. Rustad, Siri Aas & Le Billon, Philippe & Lujala, Päivi, 2017. "Has the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative been a success? Identifying and evaluating EITI goals," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 151-162.
    5. Corrigan, Caitlin C., 2014. "Breaking the resource curse: Transparency in the natural resource sector and the extractive industries transparency initiative," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 17-30.
    6. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Andrews, Nathan, 2015. "Does transparency matter? Evaluating the governance impacts of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) in Azerbaijan and Liberia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 183-192.
    7. Kasekende, Elizabeth & Abuka, Charles & Sarr, Mare, 2016. "Extractive industries and corruption: Investigating the effectiveness of EITI as a scrutiny mechanism," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 117-128.
    8. Kolstad, Ivar & Wiig, Arne, 2009. "Is Transparency the Key to Reducing Corruption in Resource-Rich Countries?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 521-532, March.
    9. Lujala, Päivi, 2018. "An analysis of the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative implementation process," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 358-381.
    10. Anuradha Joshi, 2013. "Do They Work? Assessing the Impact of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives in Service Delivery," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 31, pages 29-48, July.
    11. Päivi Lujala & Christa Brunnschweiler & Ishmael Edjekumhene, 2020. "Transparent for Whom? Dissemination of Information on Ghana’s Petroleum and Mining Revenue Management," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(12), pages 2135-2153, December.
    12. Andrés Mejía Acosta, 2013. "The Impact and Effectiveness of Accountability and Transparency Initiatives: The Governance of Natural Resources," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 31, pages 89-105, July.
    13. Virginia Haufler, 2010. "Disclosure as Governance: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative and Resource Management in the Developing World," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 10(3), pages 53-73, August.
    14. Päivi Lujala & Levon Epremian, 2017. "Transparency and natural resource revenue management: empowering the public with information?," Chapters, in: Aled Williams & Philippe Le Billon (ed.), Corruption, Natural Resources and Development, chapter 4, pages 58-68, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Ayee, Joseph & Soreide, Tina & Shukla, G. P. & Le, Tuan Minh, 2011. "Political economy of the mining sector in Ghana," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5730, The World Bank.
    16. Fox, Jonathan A., 2015. "Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 346-361.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christa Brunnschweiler & Ishmael Edjekumhene & Paivi Lujala & Sabrina Scherzer, 2022. "You need to have this information: Using videos to increase demand for accountability on public revenue management," University of East Anglia School of Economics Working Paper Series 2022-10, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    2. Serhiy Ostapchuk & Nataliya Tsaruk, 2019. "Accounting for Water, Land and Biological Assets in the Context of Sustainable Development Management: The Choice of a Main Meter," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 36-47, June.
    3. Ogbe, Michael & Lujala, Päivi, 2021. "Spatial crowdsourcing in natural resource revenue management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    4. Ferreira, João J. & Gomes, Sofia & Lopes, João M. & Zhang, Justin Z., 2023. "Ticking time bombs: The MENA and SSA regions' geopolitical risks," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vijge, Marjanneke J. & Metcalfe, Robin & Wallbott, Linda & Oberlack, Christoph, 2019. "Transforming institutional quality in resource curse contexts: The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Myanmar," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 200-209.
    2. Mawejje, Joseph, 2019. "Natural resources governance and tax revenue mobilization in sub saharan Africa: The role of EITI," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 176-183.
    3. Harouna Kinda, 2021. "Does transparency pay ? The impact of EITI on tax revenues in resource-rich developing countries," Working Papers hal-03208955, HAL.
    4. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Walter, Götz & Van de Graaf, Thijs & Andrews, Nathan, 2016. "Energy Governance, Transnational Rules, and the Resource Curse: Exploring the Effectiveness of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI)," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 179-192.
    5. Lujala, Päivi, 2018. "An analysis of the Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative implementation process," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 358-381.
    6. Ogbe, Michael & Lujala, Päivi, 2021. "Spatial crowdsourcing in natural resource revenue management," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    7. Rustad, Siri Aas & Le Billon, Philippe & Lujala, Päivi, 2017. "Has the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative been a success? Identifying and evaluating EITI goals," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 151-162.
    8. López-Cazar, Ibeth & Papyrakis, Elissaios & Pellegrini, Lorenzo, 2021. "The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and corruption in Latin America: Evidence from Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, Peru, and Trinidad and Tobago," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    9. Hevina S. Dashwood & Uwafiokun Idemudia & Bill Buenar Puplampu & Kernaghan Webb, 2022. "The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) and local institutions in Ghana’s mining communities: Challenges in understanding barriers to accountability," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(5), September.
    10. Furstenberg, Saipira & Moldalieva, Janyl, 2022. "Critical reflection on the extractive industries transparency initiative in Kyrgyzstan," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    11. Adams, Dawda & Ullah, Subhan & Akhtar, Pervaiz & Adams, Kweku & Saidi, Samir, 2019. "The role of country-level institutional factors in escaping the natural resource curse: Insights from Ghana," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 433-440.
    12. Päivi Lujala & Christa Brunnschweiler & Ishmael Edjekumhene, 2020. "Transparent for Whom? Dissemination of Information on Ghana’s Petroleum and Mining Revenue Management," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(12), pages 2135-2153, December.
    13. Christa Brunnschweiler & Ishmael Edjekumhene & Paivi Lujala & Sabrina Scherzer, 2022. "You need to have this information: Using videos to increase demand for accountability on public revenue management," University of East Anglia School of Economics Working Paper Series 2022-10, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    14. Heloïse Berkowitz & Marcelo Bucheli & Hervé Dumez, 2017. "Collectively Designing CSR Through Meta-Organizations: A Case Study of the Oil and Gas Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 753-769, July.
    15. Adams, Dawda & Adams, Kweku & Ullah, Subhan & Ullah, Farid, 2019. "Globalisation, governance, accountability and the natural resource ‘curse’: Implications for socio-economic growth of oil-rich developing countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 128-140.
    16. Ejiogu, Amanze & Ejiogu, Chibuzo & Ambituuni, Ambisisi, 2019. "The dark side of transparency: Does the Nigeria extractive industries transparency initiative help or hinder accountability and corruption control?," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(5).
    17. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Andrews, Nathan, 2015. "Does transparency matter? Evaluating the governance impacts of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) in Azerbaijan and Liberia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 183-192.
    18. Kinda, Harouna & Thiombiano, Noël, 2024. "Does transparency matter? Evaluating the Impacts of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) on Deforestation in Resource-rich Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    19. Wilson, Christopher & Claussen, Christoffer & Valverde, Pablo, 2021. "Does civil society matter for natural resource governance? A comparative analysis of multi-stakeholder participation and EITI validation outcomes," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    20. Muhamad, Goran M. & Heshmati, Almas & Khayyat, Nabaz T., 2021. "How to reduce the degree of dependency on natural resources?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Transparency; Accountability; Survey data; Ghana; Natural resources; Petroleum;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • Q38 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy (includes OPEC Policy)

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:181:y:2021:i:c:s0921800920321947. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.